I just feel there is an adverse inference that something is up with the store (hence wanting the info of the boss) without proffering any information as to what. To close the thread leaves that inference in parenthesis and I don't think that is entirely fair.
If the OP has a beef with Andertons, then they're welcome to give us the skinny. Others can then comment and we have a balance.
But, BC is the message, not the messenger.