Kev

Because if they did, this thread probably wouldn't exist and the basses would enter into an extremely congested price point with nothing to make it stand out from the crowd. I like the champagne finish and don't have a huge issue with the headstock, they're not going to use the old paddle design with a small lightwood body.

Understandably, the marketing of the pedal does nothing to invite people in who want normal! Some may be swayed if they get a video in front of them, but generally I think anyone looking for "standard" stuff wouldn't give it a 2nd glance. Even the filter, using the phrase/terminology "Ladder" doesn't immediately make your average player think its a cool envelope filter pedal, especially when surrounded by things like crush. vinyl and glitch. Its an interesting choice to go so niche in that sense, be interested to know how its doing sale wise compared to other releases.

What problems have you had with Reverb? EBay is grotesquely unfair to a seller and I thought Reverb was just more balanced. This sounds like a simple NAD case that the seller has refused to compromise on, so how did Reverb handle this? Sorry to hear of the trouble. If it was me, the bass would be going back as I'd never get over the issues unless it could be restored fully to original spec.

Someone on facebook has just stuck one up for sale at £800 and its getting the response you'd hope it would 😅

£18.50 on the door, £0.95 saving and not funding AXS greed. Works for me.

Is there a way of actually buying a ticket for £16? It links to AXS on the site and comes to £19.45 with fees, which I absolutely resent paying. Can you pay on the door?

Loving the new content, along with the website it really marks a big jump forward in online presence for sure. Nice one!

Ah okay fair enough, QC it is then! Its a different world, but once you learn how to use it i'm sure you'll find itll do everything you want, and tons of stuff you didn't think you'd need. I've owned since launch, replaced quite a hefty pedalboard, and no regrets at all.

I guess I'd open with, what is leading you towards to Quad Cortex, given your preference for what sounds like a very straightforward setup? Gut response is to go Nano, as it doesn't sound like you'll use anything but captures and IRs, but just curious.

The new updated has an OC-2 and Meatbox model, nice for bass to get some attention. No experience with a Meatbox, but the OC-2 model is bloody good , compares very, very well with the original '82 I have on the board!

Its the position of the bridge that gives me the most anxiety...

What is wrong with people! 😅 As above, this bass was a good deal for US players, anywhere else the cost of shipping etc takes it way above its worth compared to others in the range.

Anything well built and. crucially, well set up will work, preferably with hum buckers. Getting a "good" B is 99% about making sure the neck and bridge are set up optimally. String gauge is preference, scale length is a huge 2nd to setup. I currently use a StingRay and Alpher bass in B. I left 5's behind back in 2019 in favour of drop tuned 4's, never looked back. Realised I never liked using a G string and felt much more comfortable on a narrower neck, so made total sense.

Whilst still not being the sound you're looking for, it was still a big difference right? As those pickups and preamp should have transformed the sound, like taking a blanket off your amp. The far east Barts are not good IMO but swapping them out usually makes a good budget bass great.

Why hide?

He needs to actually become a better drummer and learn to be able to play to the gig. Finding solutions to bring his volume down is nonsense, he just needs to accept his performances are bringing the band down.

DM me the thread links @patrikmarky and I'll sort it 👍

Just to check the obvious, are you getting this with multiple "E" strings you've tried?

Note how they don't claim innovation though! 😅

Phew. After all that, I'd let Innovation at least have the rest of the afternoon off.

There once was a bassist named Hugh, Whose excitement was truly untrue. He waited all day, For Fender to say, "We've got nothing new, just for you." I suppose the 15th actually means sometime this evening?

"Innovation never rests" Its bold if its just colours and a new name for the same pickup. Difference with Ernie Ball and Rickenbacker is they don't do the same thing. The Stingray Special was the first time they reinvented the wheel since the 3EQ model came out. Sure they have the Classic Series and the replacement Retro series and a couple of artist models, but they don't seem to drag their fanbase to anywhere near the same degree. Same with Ric. Nothing like the same marketing philosophies.

Because I imagine Spector was the only artist deal on the table good enough! But I agree, what on earth is the point. I'd like to think if I "made it" I wouldn't just go with a brand for the money.