MichaelDean Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago Looks like they're properly announcing headless Dingwalls at Guitar Summit this year. Doesn't appear to be any other details yet. The little wings for the headstock so it fits on a hangar seem odd, but it's nice they've thought about it. 5 Quote
Bass Direct Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 14 minutes ago, BassApprentice said: Image nicked from @Bass Direct We cannot wait for these! Already on order! 3 Quote
velvetkevorkian Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago ...how do you tune it? Is that the thumbscrews at the bridge? Quote
MichaelDean Posted 9 hours ago Author Posted 9 hours ago Looks like it. And a lever to clamp the string at the "headstock". Quote
BassApprentice Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, MichaelDean said: Looks like it. And a lever to clamp the string at the "headstock". Yup - and little extenders so you can use a wall hanger? @Bass Direct estimate of price? Edited 9 hours ago by BassApprentice Quote
SumOne Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Nice one. I've been hoping for a headless Dingwall for ages. I think they dropped the ball on this and are now playing catch up on multiscale headless with Ibanez (and Strandberg, Hils, Sire). If you're making basses for people that like innovation (which is generally the Dingwall selling point) then it seems crazy to have old fashioned impractical headstock (heavy exactly where you don't want weight) when headless technology is what it is now. Quote
Woodinblack Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Not a dingwall fan but the extender is a good idea for hanging, if that is what it is for! Quote
jeffjohnson Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I didn't think they could make them any uglier 1 1 Quote
Machines Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, SumOne said: Nice one. I've been hoping for a headless Dingwall for ages. I think they dropped the ball on this and are now playing catch up on multiscale headless with Ibanez (and Strandberg, Hils, Sire) I know they've been in development at least 3 years, I think Sheldon really wanted to get the design right - but agree they are a bit late to the party. I also expected a much more different body design to the Afterburner, but it is unmistakably a Dingwall. Not for me (i've just got an ABZ), but would definitely have a crack on one. Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, jeffjohnson said: I didn't think they could make them any uglier The finish looks cheap. 1 Quote
crazycloud Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago A headless 5 might be in my future then, depending on what they cost. Quote
Musicman20 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, crazycloud said: A headless 5 might be in my future then, depending on what they cost. Are these a Canadian bass or an import MIC bass? Quote
crazycloud Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago No idea. Doesn't really matter to me either way. Quote
Musicman20 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 41 minutes ago, crazycloud said: No idea. Doesn't really matter to me either way. I just mean the price will be dramatically different whichever it is. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.