lownote Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 If I daisy chain two cabs of different specs in terms of numbers of drivers and power but the same ohm-age, how does the head distribute the power between to the two cabs? For example, say I couple a Phil Jones C8 (8x5") 800w 8 ohms with a Cab 47 (4x7") 300w 8 ohms. Does one cab get more power than t'other? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_c2 Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 Same ohms ------> same power delivered to both. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 The head doesn't distribute power. The relative impedances of the cabs does. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 6 hours ago, lownote12 said: ohm-age Impedance It's called Impedance instead of Resistance, because it changes due to frequency changes. Two 8-Ohm cabinets will receive a roughly equal amount of Power from the amp, but how they each respond to that Power will be different. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_c2 Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 40 minutes ago, Killed_by_Death said: Two 8-Ohm cabinets will receive a roughly equal amount of Power from the amp, but how they each respond to that Power will be different. Good point - if the sensitivity is wildly different between them, the apparent sound volume out of them will also be different. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Dare Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 A C8 is less efficient than a CAB47, so the perceived volume from each will not be the same. Also, I'm pretty sure the C8 is 4 ohms. It's effectively two C4s, which are 8 ohms each, in one box. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 2 hours ago, Killed_by_Death said: It's called Impedance instead of Resistance, because it changes due to frequency changes. It's called impedance because ohmage is what you pay to Clapton. 😊 Besides which, impedance and resistance aren't the only things measured in ohms. There's also capacitive and inductive reactance. You'll never see a proper engineering document that doesn't say which of those four is being referred to with respect to a value in ohms. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 1 minute ago, Bill Fitzmaurice said: You'll never see a proper engineering document You're probably correct. Although, I did see many Engineering documents when I was heading up a Document Control center on a refinery construction project, but those were mostly about Piping & Tanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 Usually you'll see R and Z listed in ohms, with R referring to DC resistance and Z impedance. C for capacitance is measured in microfarads, uF, Le for inductance is measured in millihenries, mH. You seldom see capacitive reactance, Xc, or inductive reactance, Xl, both measured in ohms, other than in a spec sheet for a given capacitor or inductor. You do see the result of Xc and Xl in Z, as impedance is the sum of R, Xc and Xl. R is a constant value irrespective of frequency, but both Xc and Xl vary with frequency, and along with them Z. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 People should use nF more, 47 nF or 22 nF, not 0.047 µF 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merton Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 34 minutes ago, Killed_by_Death said: Although, I did see many Engineering documents when I was heading up a Document Control center on a refinery construction project, but those were mostly about Piping & Tanks. Oooh now you’re getting into fun stuff. Material grades and specs, pipe schedules, NDT specs and standards, welding requirements etc etc 🤓 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 Molybdenum alloys were the biggest PITA, special welding circumstances & preparation. I was flummoxed to know that Steve Harris uses Monel string! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merton Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 Haha! I had a similar experience when I had the same revelation 🙃 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lfalex v1.1 Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 3 hours ago, Killed_by_Death said: Impedance It's called Impedance instead of Resistance, because it changes due to frequency changes. Which can, in turn, be illustrated by a graph, which shows the Modulus of Impedance; the way in which Impedance varies by frequency. *Please note I have no affiliation with Modulus, nor am I on their payroll etc. etc. ** Other manufacturers of graphite necks are available. 😉 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 Young's Modulus is the one I'm accustomed to, for stiffness, I like to experiment with necks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Killed_by_Death said: People should use nF more, 47 nF or 22 nF, not 0.047 µF It depends on the application. 22nF or 47nF would be common in electronics, but never in a crossover. The value range there mainly runs between 2uF and 100uF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 I just find it irrationally annoying to me when folks add a decimal point & then use a smaller unit of measure. It's like commenting that you had 3,000 milligrams of Sodium. NO, you had 3 Grams! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Count Bassy Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Killed_by_Death said: I just find it irrationally annoying to me when folks add a decimal point & then use a smaller unit of measure. It's like commenting that you had 3,000 milligrams of Sodium. NO, you had 3 Grams! What about the otherway round though. 0.005 Metres instead of 5mm? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 I know a guy who likes to inform people he can only have 3,000 milligrams for Sodium/day, but I doubt he described driving distances in Feet, LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Killed_by_Death said: I just find it irrationally annoying to me when folks add a decimal point & then use a smaller unit of measure. It's like commenting that you had 3,000 milligrams of Sodium. NO, you had 3 Grams! That goes to marketing. Selling a bottle of 1000 mg pills makes it sound like you're getting something much better than a bottle of 1g pills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 Feeling fancy yesterday, so we bought Evian in 1 Liter bottles, & labeled as such. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Fitzmaurice Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 Shame, you could have got 1000 milliliters for the same price. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lfalex v1.1 Posted May 19, 2021 Share Posted May 19, 2021 (edited) Surely 61.024 ci? 😉 That said, I use Metric for "small" measurements, and go back to Imperial for longer distances; Kilometres are meaningless relative to miles... Edited May 19, 2021 by Lfalex v1.1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killed_by_Death Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 When I returned to the U.S. from Asia I was still speaking CID displacement for engines & got strange looks. It's all Liters now, I recall it starting with the 5.0 Liter Mustang GT: This wasn't mine, but I have one VERY similar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BassmanPaul Posted May 22, 2021 Share Posted May 22, 2021 If you add an 8Ω load in parallel with a 4Ω load (2.67Ω total) the 4Ω load will get two thirds of the available power. In series (12Ω total) the 4Ω load will get one third of that power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.