You're saying the player acts as a big antenna into the bass electronics when he isn't connected to them? But when he is connected to them he stops transmission? No comprendez.
Is that a trick question? Have at it.
I am not an electrician. I don't even know why the strings need to be at ( signal?) ground! All I said was ( grounding everything and everything with ) copper foil fixed the lack of (effective) ground at the bridge ( replacing fingers on strings).
I am well aware of Faraday's cage effect. Fingers on strings are not a Faraday cage.
Bernie is poking a banana in his ear.
Burt : ''Earnie, wtf?''
Earnie : ''I am keeping the crocodiles away from Sesame St''
Burt : ''EARNIE, THERE ARE NO CROCODILES ON SESAME ST!!!"
Earnie : ''See, it's working!''.
I think hardware is pretty well correlated from the barely acceptable to pretty good stuff. Schallers breaking is a glaring departure from their historical price reliability correlation tradition. They will pay in the end.
You haven't made a point. You have only reiterated propositions of the OP without stating a position.
Fancy basses appeal to some players who can afford them. So what?
You got the last bit right. Certainly cheap basses have come a long way since 1969 but you're still looking at polishing something that came out the back end of a cow to get a gem like object.
Cool. You will have incidentally grounded the bridge in the process since there was no buzz when you grounded it yourself. Next time you're playing under a dimmer or fluorescent lights you'll be golden too.
They don't go poof because they are also rated for a heap more voltage and the average bass signal is very much less than its peak voltage so the power is much lower than peak in practice.
You can.
They have very good rates on their worldwide shipping. You won't pay a penny of VAT to the UK.
Andertons in UK undercut BF in UK effectively by doing free shipping! I guess BF don't mind as it saves them shagging around shipping single cabs.