Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

dr1

Member
  • Posts

    266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dr1

  1. dr1

    gone

    [quote name='Brams77' post='1092722' date='Jan 17 2011, 05:46 PM'].... I actually informed myself pretty good on this subject, so dont say "please"... Late 70s stock Fenders (not custom instruments) or atleast almost all of what I have experienced (had in my hands) or heard from 3rd parties are heavy to really heavy basses/guitars indeed, that being said late 70s fenders have ash bodies and early 70 ones have mostly alder bodies (appart from the natural finished ones), not that there is only heavy ash ofcourse... but still most ash pieces are heavier then most alder ones (appart from specific swamp ash which is very popular by a lot of beautique bass builders nowadays). Light bodies are made of trees that grow fast/ had lots of light so trees that where standing at/or near the edge of woods. Trees that grow slow are heavier cos they have more compact grain thus the more mass and more weight, so a conclusion could be Fender "selected" differently over the years perhaps different tone goal I'm not sure. More mass is more sustain and less resonace, less mass is more resonance and less sustain, hence the newer US sadowsky basses use chambered bodies cos Roger couldn't get real light bodies as easily as before, but in this way he found a manner to gain some resonance and loose some weight...[/quote] sorry for saying "please" but you got to inform your self some more. like i said, they produced heavy ash bodies in early '70s aswell - and light ash or alder in late 70s too. in example, my friend '72 jazz bass is heaviest bass I ever touched, while my '77 jazz were one of lightest. and so on and so on....I had several and tried a few from others. cheers!
  2. dr1

    gone

    [quote name='Brams77' post='1072160' date='Dec 29 2010, 10:15 PM']Well it's true [b]early 70s Fenders are very light ones[/b], (don't know about paint tho:D) and this one is not only light is thas the slim/jazz type nut aswell. You don't see that often! And please guys buy this before I get some serious attack of GAS here!!![/quote] and late 70s fenders are heavy? please. there's heavy and light ones from any era depending on wood they have used
  3. [quote name='bubinga5' post='1070366' date='Dec 27 2010, 07:56 PM']i like to think im opened minded most of the time when it comes to music...me and my sister were not a fan of the Smiths when we were growing up.. as ive got older i love them...just wonderful music..in my naivity i could never see groove in there music..but as ive gotten older, i totally love there music.. i could listen to it all day.. also is Morrissey not the coolest dude! two of there more popular tunes [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjkMhwNWcbY"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjkMhwNWcbY[/url] [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRa3jIzZ1EY"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRa3jIzZ1EY[/url][/quote] well,as oposite to you,my sister and my self we were massive fans of the smiths in our teenages (mid 80es) and just recently after all these years and all kind of music i've been into, i got back to smiths and what a great band they were! try meat is murder album (that was first one i came across back then) and queen is dead. beautiful songs! i also liked morrisey solo work too.
  4. [quote name='Mr. Foxen' post='1043226' date='Dec 1 2010, 02:25 AM']Amp and cab, what is it. [b]You might need a tweeter[/b].[/quote] can't help it - i need to quote answer for "how to make my bass sound funkier"
  5. dr1

    '77 reissue

    agathis is OK, dont be pushed off cause of that. i had squier vm fretless - i changed the pups (nordstrand) and the sound were superb! even stock pups sounded good to be fair...
  6. man learn every day! never seen such a pickguard for jazz. bump from me,as that's a great looking bass. i also have p bass from '83, one of the finest i ever touched. good luck! (hint: the price is still bit step for today market)
  7. I had an JV P bass - wasnt impressed at all. heavy maple body, no sound at all, just a "booom" I guess that is not typical with JV instruments. My Fender Japan jazz ('94 I think) were MUCH better.
  8. personally, I don't like black blocks/maple combo - especially with sunburst. But I can't see evil in Squier offering more and more models (as someone pointed) Thumbs up!
  9. looks like ash body (long wide stripes) and badass bridge. logo is early Fender logo so it may be aither orig 50s Fender or 57 re.
  10. i guess you already found what you need, but here's fast tips- 60th models had, like you learned, decal with "electric bass,contour body" etc on the headstock. also they usually have tort pickguard on the reissues, aswell the thumb rest or fingerhook attached. the tuners were also adequate, big ones, with wide plates on the back. standard has smaller tuners (like mexican) as for 70s those have blocks and bigger logo. would be usefull to send the link and photo and i will tell you what is it about. from what you described it's standard japanese jazz bass. here's mine - it was standard but i pimped it to a 60 model (tuners,tort and fingerhook) all in all great basses.
  11. there's a lot of things and details and there are books. but what you really want - to have some kind of illustrated encyclopedia or something particular at this moment?
  12. [quote name='lanark' post='1002468' date='Oct 27 2010, 01:07 PM']One thing I've noticed about Jazz basses though, is that they have a tendancy to fall over because of their assymetrical bottom. Since I picked up my Squier CV Jazz I can't count the number of times I've put it on the stand at rehearsal, gone to make a cup of tea and heard it crash to the floor. One of these days it might actually get damaged.[/quote] Gosh! it must be you,Lanark,from Alistair Grey book,right?
  13. [quote name='yorick' post='1003975' date='Oct 28 2010, 04:13 PM']Get it right lads.... Crafted in Japan is the best [/quote] well, gotta admit - Crafted in Japan are nowadays better than earlier Made in Japan from 80s.
  14. [quote name='chris_b' post='1003602' date='Oct 28 2010, 11:18 AM']MIA foam is better than the MIM foam by all accounts.[/quote] ah! I got MIM foam which is far better than any USA foam by all means!!!
  15. I have two Fender (1964. style) Jazz Bass decals if someone is interested. I bought them several months ago - I wanted to change headstock logo on my HW1 jazz bass (to have it look more like '60 jazz bass,you know) at the end of the day, I changed my mind about all that and sold the bass eventually. so, the decals (genuine!) are at ny home now and I'd sell them for reasonable price.
  16. I used La bella (still got them,as they re best for me) TI, Roto 77 and Daddario. TI also are great sounding abnd feeling,but they were kinda "too light" especially after La bella (Jamerson set) I felt they are being better on my jazz bass. so, it's very personal thing. I didnt like Roto - even helluva lot players plays those, including pretty big cats. D'Addario as well... so,see for your self mate, it's only way. plus,bear in mind that it also has a lot with the action (set up),your attack, amplifier... and finally - La Bella can't be stringed through body...
  17. [quote name='Chris2112' post='994963' date='Oct 20 2010, 02:40 PM']Still, the amount of feverish interest over a 70's jazz is confusing, as I've never really been blown away by these examples and many people complained about them at the time! Still, I don't see what the fuss is over the 60's ones either so YMMV...[/quote] I played lots of '70 jazzes, all of them were brilliant! as for '60 jazzes, they 're super cool in every sense, plus they are worth the money, so it's lots $$$ reasons for the fuss!
  18. [quote name='lazzer' post='994753' date='Oct 20 2010, 01:21 PM']Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Ash mainly used for the clear coated bodies?[/quote] perhaps "mainly" but not exclusively...
  19. to my eyes, those grains is more like ash. alder has thiny short strips, not like these. as for what they used in which era, I got '77 jazz, it's alder/maple. pretty light. also, ash could be light too.
  20. my kind of bass. congrats! what an condition! on the other hand, i had a pleasure to play exact colour and wood scheme P bass from '69 - it looked as brand new! the owner kept it unplayable,as very soon after bought it,something went wrong with vol.pot! and he didnt bothered to repair it. so, today, that pot is repaired and the bass itself looks like shiny new one - from 1969, which is, my year of birth... kinda long story,yes...
  21. i wonder did they sell all ten pieces? probably they did. but, i couldn't but to remember me putting this great bass once here for sale - an "original Marcus Miller prototype", all orig. 76/77 (neck/body and pots) Fender jazz and asking 1800 pounds and everyone were like "too much you asking,matey!"
  22. yup, Precision is my favourite! but i do love my jazz,too...
×
×
  • Create New...