Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

RICKENBACKER PORN


matski

Recommended Posts

I’ve just bought back my June 1976 4001. 

I bought it in 1989 for £325 from DGC in Durham. I stupidly sold it in the summer of 2017 and regretted it ever since. Thankfully the guy I sold it to offered me first refusal when he was considering shifting it again. Needless to say I didn’t think twice. It’s now back where it belongs with my 1985 4003s 

826FA6FC-5D1A-412B-B6D2-8B9A16EEE70C.jpeg

7E0C7A85-71D9-4382-9AED-8759FB0B6BB1.jpeg

050AA277-8F40-40DB-B90C-247D22D113AA.jpeg

9BD3C230-B1C1-4EE8-8290-3DCF27E185BB.jpeg

7CED6C02-98B6-46C7-8400-989B910A74BA.jpeg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
On 11/03/2019 at 10:07, cd_david said:

I’ve just bought back my June 1976 4001. 

I bought it in 1989 for £325 from DGC in Durham. I stupidly sold it in the summer of 2017 and regretted it ever since. Thankfully the guy I sold it to offered me first refusal when he was considering shifting it again. Needless to say I didn’t think twice. It’s now back where it belongs with my 1985 4003s 

826FA6FC-5D1A-412B-B6D2-8B9A16EEE70C.jpeg

7E0C7A85-71D9-4382-9AED-8759FB0B6BB1.jpeg

050AA277-8F40-40DB-B90C-247D22D113AA.jpeg

9BD3C230-B1C1-4EE8-8290-3DCF27E185BB.jpeg

7CED6C02-98B6-46C7-8400-989B910A74BA.jpeg

Nice pair!

0ATfDnz.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found some old pics which arent very good but may as well post anyway.

1976 Band pic with 4000 Ric Azureglo (early non metallic Blue)

1551354966_01GiffandRic1976.jpg.157ffe8e9e7b6aa9303335da1bd7c4c5.jpg

1985 Band pic with 4003 Ric Fireglo

1737821600_03GiffandRic1985.JPG.5152d73a5c5c4333e992cdafc1e09230.JPG

Red stage lights spoiling pic of '80's Ric Fireglo next to Maton Fretless Pro

659737256_RicMatonPeavey.thumb.JPG.f5d3c370c599e73774700846ce48aa22.JPG

Current 2017 Model 4003 Fireglo In Various Poses

973015539_Ric4003andRumble500C115Cab.thumb.JPG.669978869c1c6ffb064a13661873ed21.JPG401788524_SterlingS.U.B.andRickenbacker40031.thumb.JPG.871b32078af1c290233b58fab2a234ce.JPG

422482873_RICKENBACKER4003PAULSBOOKS.thumb.jpg.8f919a13842f490b504a9e0d68164967.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I0nYRGt.jpg

Received this '78 yesterday. I've owned a 2006 4003 once, but this one plays way better with it's thinner neck. Sounds great too with enough meat on the bridge pickup, so probably the feared .47 cap has been removed earlier. 

The bass has a cream colored truss rod cover. It looks original to me, but haven't seen this before. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SurroundedByManatees said:

I0nYRGt.jpg

Received this '78 yesterday. I've owned a 2006 4003 once, but this one plays way better with it's thinner neck. Sounds great too with enough meat on the bridge pickup, so probably the feared .47 cap has been removed earlier. 

The bass has a cream colored truss rod cover. It looks original to me, but haven't seen this before. 

Mmm, very nice! What are those odd little bolts between the pickup and the bridge for?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SurroundedByManatees said:

Nothing. My guess is that the pickup cover had been mounted there. I'm planning to fill them up and make them visually dissappear (as far as possible). 

Reason i ask is I have something similar on my '82 4001, two bolts either side of the bridge where presumably the previous owner decided to put a Fender-style bridge cover over it (???!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a coincidence(?) .. If it's something that rickenbacker did, it's unknown to me. But maybe someone recognizes this and has an explanation. 

The bolts are parallel to the pickup bolts, so I assume that the pickup cover had been mounted there. Just a theory though :)

Edited by SurroundedByManatees
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SurroundedByManatees said:

I0nYRGt.jpg

Received this '78 yesterday. I've owned a 2006 4003 once, but this one plays way better with it's thinner neck. Sounds great too with enough meat on the bridge pickup, so probably the feared .47 cap has been removed earlier. 

The bass has a cream colored truss rod cover. It looks original to me, but haven't seen this before. 

This is so beautiful!! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SurroundedByManatees said:

I0nYRGt.jpg

Received this '78 yesterday. I've owned a 2006 4003 once, but this one plays way better with it's thinner neck. Sounds great too with enough meat on the bridge pickup, so probably the feared .47 cap has been removed earlier. 

The bass has a cream colored truss rod cover. It looks original to me, but haven't seen this before. 

Montezuma Brown.

i guess it has the elongated heel at the headstock end too.

I've got a push-pull pot on mine so I can bypass the .0047 series cap, like they do on the 4003.

I've no idea what those screws are for - it certainly wasn't the stock Ric pickup surround and it doesn't look like where they'd be for a 50s style pickguard.

Edited by prowla
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SurroundedByManatees said:

I think it has the elongated heel indeed. Don't have the bass in my hands right new, but there is a thickened area from the headstock towards the fretboard. 

The colour should be autumnglo :)

Ah yes - Autumnglo!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jus Lukin said:

Let us know how you get on with it!

I've only played it at home but it's so far absolutely wonderful. Got the Rickenbacker sound but it can also do 'normal' bass sounds too. I normally only play lightweight basses (I've got two Maruszczyk Jakes - both around the 7lbs/3.15kg weight - one if for sale at the moment to pay for this if anyone is interested) so would normally avoid anything even remotely heavier (this is 9lbs/4kg) but it feels as light as the Jakes (this is the walnut version. I understand the standard ones are a little heavier). 

When I first saw pictures of this I was disappointed that both the iconic bridge shape had gone as well as the chrome pickup surrounds etc (and the triangular shaped new pickups), but in the flesh it's still a Rickenbacker (but very well made :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 6feet7 said:

I've only played it at home but it's so far absolutely wonderful. Got the Rickenbacker sound but it can also do 'normal' bass sounds too. I normally only play lightweight basses (I've got two Maruszczyk Jakes - both around the 7lbs/3.15kg weight - one if for sale at the moment to pay for this if anyone is interested) so would normally avoid anything even remotely heavier (this is 9lbs/4kg) but it feels as light as the Jakes (this is the walnut version. I understand the standard ones are a little heavier). 

When I first saw pictures of this I was disappointed that both the iconic bridge shape had gone as well as the chrome pickup surrounds etc (and the triangular shaped new pickups), but in the flesh it's still a Rickenbacker (but very well made :)

Yes, I have to say that I think they look a bit "sterile" with a generic bridge.

But some folks will be calling hallelujah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 03/03/2020 at 20:57, prowla said:

Yes, I have to say that I think they look a bit "sterile" with a generic bridge.

But some folks will be calling hallelujah!

It is sterile looking (which isn't the idea of a Rick bass in my opinion) but it's such a good bass I can live with it :) and now it's got black instead of white plastic parts it looks (in my opinion) a whole lot better.

3E560748-EE64-4305-9820-0C8BAB7C1469_1_201_a.jpeg

BEA3B36A-8761-4C3E-9E15-FEA9D333FCF1_1_201_a.jpeg

Edited by 6feet7
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 03/03/2020 at 21:10, 6feet7 said:

It is sterile looking (which isn't the idea of a Rick bass in my opinion) but it's such a good bass I can live with it :)

I've never played one (a Ric 5-string), or even seen one; I'm sure it'll happen some time.

I do quite like added flexibility of a 5-string though, so it may just be a matter of time.

stWdo6X.jpg

Edited by prowla
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...