Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Beedster

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    14,707
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

Everything posted by Beedster

  1. But yes, if you know what you want in a Precision, then a bitsa self-build is the way to go, and often cheaper than buying a whole bass. The below is my keeper instrument, OK I've come close to selling a couple of times due to COVID cash flow issues, but having survived it remains my go to bass. It's like a Fender Custom Shop Tony Franklin Relic, although slightly more resonant than was my original TF (courtesy largely of a VERY good Warmoth neck with perfect ebony board and shallow depth 44mm nut which has made every bass on which it has been installed resonate for longer), Lollar PJ set, Kiogon harness, vintage Gotoh lollipop tuners (the aesthetics of which for some reason I really like), all for around the cost of a used MIM Precision. As per some of the comments above, basses are a lottery, with bitsas you just keep playing the lottery, albeit with components as opposed to instruments, which is a lot cheaper. It's also far more diagnostic/scientific, because with each switch you're in effect conducting a controlled experiment along the lines "what difference does switching this for this actually make?'. You get there eventually, it's fun but you also, I believe, end up with a bass that you feel closer to as the result.
  2. There'll be another along soon I'm sure folks
  3. Sold to The Real Walshy
  4. Always a good sign.........
  5. Good stuff Nik, I'm lining up the necessary tools as I write .............
  6. The unlined FL neck is going nowhere Brian, trust me
  7. There is wisdom there Nik. Problem is I'll no doubt join the '78 neck to the '78 body and find it's the holy grail I've been searching for all these years Hope all's well mate Chris
  8. That would fail a primary school design project
  9. How to get sued by three bass manufacturers?
  10. Funny how we all go on about Mesa, Ampeg, and even Marshall, as well as so many others, yet WEM rarely get a mention on this forum, despite the tone being lovely and as you say Jack, their tube amps being rather good at being heard despite their conservative power ratings
  11. Good shout mate
  12. I've had a few PM's about the neck which has made me think. Below is the original body for the above neck, this is the bass I pick up and play pretty much every day purely for the pleasure, and it's a cracker. But I'm thinking of perhaps putting the '78 neck back on this body and selling it as a close to original '78 as possible (it's got a Jason Lollar P/J set and Kiogon circuit in there at present). Feels like the right thing to do to be honest. So, this evening I'm going to switch necks and see how each bass fares
  13. The old Walshy yes, not this new imposter
  14. The old Walshy yes, not this new imposter
  15. Post of the year so far
  16. flip that mate, be weak
  17. An understatement if ever there was one
  18. Thanks guys, I'm gutted to be selling this to be honest, it's an outstanding bass on every level, but for whatever reason I like a Precision to not just sound like a Precision but feel like one, a big part of which for me is the neck width and profile. This neck is gorgeous, but feels more like a Jazz in my clumsy hands (although I think it's actually between 40-41mm so not quite as narrow as a Jazz). It's ironic really because for many players the narrower 70's Precision necks are highly sought after. If I could find a neck with this much mojo as this one, but with a 44mm nut (same profile as the one I sold Walshy recently), I would be a very happy man indeed. Having said that, I'm pretty much a one bass guy these days, my 70's P/J FL - with a wide and deep neck - is the only bass that gets picked up with any regularity, and I'm getting to the point that, especially with heavy flats, I don't really need frets for the stuff I play anyway. Might change when/if we start gigging again of course
  19. Yep, I totally get that as well On reflection the mistake I made, despite doing a whole lot of research into the best kit for my money, was believing that e-drums were going to be a low noise solution for rehearsing and recording traditional drum sounds (jazz, rock and blues). This was in part because none of the genres in question require either an especially 'big' or non-traditional sound, but also many drummers I'd like to have used them to rehearse/record simply did not like playing them.
  20. That is true, one of the reasons I sacked my e-kit was that to get the best out of it for anything other than headphone use it ended up being as loud as a normal kit; too little amplification (or poor quality amplification) meant you heard the noise of the kit above the noise of the drums if you get my drift. I always felt that whilst with a real kit noise of kit and noise of drums are synonymous (possibly wrong word there), with an e-kit the two were often at odds. I didn’t explain that very well
  21. Any offers before i put this on eBay?
  22. Any offers before I put this on eBay?
  23. Re monitor I used the Roland PM3-V which despite being VERY heavy is small, does a great job with kick even at low volumes, and has two HF monitors. I never giggled with it, but it would be up to the job for small events. I also use it is a bass amp occasionally. Russ, I’d sell you mine but it would cost a fortune to courier
  24. I emailed PJB direct a few years back, got a reply within a few hours from a tech guy and when that didn’t resolve the issue Phil himself joined the conversation. Very impressive, so I’d suggest that route perhaps?
  25. True on both counts, I sold my TD30 because there is nothing better than real drums. And yes, the box count is ridiculous
×
×
  • Create New...