Al Krow

Our very own @Ba55me15ter playing a relatively rare BB1500A!

Great playing and nice Yamaha bass - which model?

Well this could prove fun then...😂

I think it will be shipping in Feb and has a launch price of around $180, so I guess something similar in £ over here. Update: GuitarGuitar have them for pre-order at £165. I'm just wondering whether this will double up as an analogue octave pedal.

fixed

For Audient lovers, these guys aren't resting on their laurels with the release of their Mk2 models of the iD4 and iD14 and they've kept prices pegged at the old Mk1 pricing.

Pigtronix Space Rip - Analog Synth Check this out! Analog synth offering sawtooth and square wave in multiple voices: with both a sub and octave down. Shares the tiny form factor of the Bananana Matryoshka (remember that - seems to have all but disappeared from view?) although without quite such tiny knobs! If it provides a few more usable sounds on bass than the BM did and has the excellent tracking promised by Pigtronix it could be worth investigating further. Colour me interested!

Red Panda Bitmap 2 NAMM 2021 - this looks like it's just stolen a march on the bitcrush competition! Bitcrusher, sample rate reduction AND modulation with triangle, square and random waveforms. Even allows you to save presets.

@LukeFRC are you a "grandmama" or "granny" person down the pub?

Fair enough. I just recall someone mentioning him before on this thread (might have been me 😁) Due to the terms of my NDA, I'm not at liberty to discuss this further. Absolutely, probably more so.

You're giving me FAR too many open goals JB! Do I resist saying would that be first 34 or the second 34, or just any old 34 sir? 😁

Did Bunny Brunel have zero input into the design of the Yamaha Broad Bass range? Partly asking because I find myself strangely drawn to both the Carvin BBs (Bunny Brunel) in the FS. Probably 'cos they are neck through, look great, and have the same initials as the Yamaha BBs (Broad Bass) which you all know I'm a huge fan of. And they do have a passing body shape resemblance to the Yammy BBs too, agreed? Any of you good folk perchance come across Carvin BBs in your travels?

So I guess the starting point is for you to spill the beans on what you felt your 343434343...434 was missing? Apart from a low B string 😁

Well a BB 343 would certainly, absolutely, no question, totally, all night long give us something to talk about...but we know what you meant 😁

V good analogy of TC and SA pedals! Potentially / actually great pedals with shocking on-pedal UI IMO, YMMV etc. Spectracomp would be a good case in point: apparently awesome potential under the hood but one knob "spawn of the devil" (quoting our fav @51m0n) with no metering on the pedal itself. Ugh!! But tbf both TC and SA have a large fan base.

Yes indeedy, I've had my share of SA pedals over the years including a current "one series" pedal which shares exactly the same UI as the C4. So feel free to substitute "AS" for "C4" in my earlier post - I guess I was mentioning the C4 because that is the one I would buy next in a heartbeat if it had a better UI, which is the point being discussed. I totally agree your point that you would need a separate midi pedal to have any idea which patch you are using on it. When you have to fork out £250 (new) for a pedal like the C4, the fact that you even need to do that is just plain rude! IMO the UI on a £65 Zoom B1-4 leaves the SA UI in the dust. You don't need separate midi or a phone or a PC to edit and store up to 50 effects patches and you know exactly which patch you're using and it's a doddle to scroll through them. Be interesting to see whether SA agree with my PoV on this and end up bringing out an updated set of pedals with numeric displays later this year 😉 Until then I'll be avoiding SA pedals, just my PoV...

Hah - that was also my earlier question! Great minds / fools / take your pick 😁

There is so much value in getting the UI right! I think we've all agreed about how shocking the Alesis SR models were in that regard. It's something that Zoom have got very right with their budget multis like the B1-4 and which put significantly more expensive pedals to shame e.g. something like the SA C4 where the tech looks just great but where you have no decent ability to edit without recourse to a PC. Anyway I'm avoiding SA pedals until they can be ars*ed to provide some form numeric display, at a minimum, to at least let me know which of the 128 patches I'm on!

Ah that makes much better sense now! Actually that's a really interesting point. I think you mentioned that your 424 sounded much more "alive" than your TRBX, hmmm...seems there may be a bit pattern then if the 735A is using the same preamp?

I've kinda wondered whether I should have kept my 735A and just swapped the preamp with a John East 3 band. But I guess I already have several really good active basses and suspect I may still have picked up my 1025 at every opportunity!

Hah! I'm now confused, if you have had the 1025X and have a 735A you should have a pretty good idea how they compare already?

I personally preferred my purely passive 1025 over the two active/passive 735As I've had. I think I boiled that down to not being blown away by the preamp in the 735A, whereas I love the 1025 passive tone. Just my two cents worth.

Maybe putting it a little strongly given the sum total of my Boss kit is just one pedal, bought 18 months ago...on that basis pretty much every BCer is on some form of gear discovery 😂

Well we definitely need a pic of your board and bag in action! 😎