-
Posts
15,250 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
25
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by Happy Jack
-
Absolutely this ^. It is inevitable. But I don't believe it's helpful to greet every new virus as potentially The End Of Civilisation As We Know It.
-
1 in 340 out of a population of 60m means about 176,000 people ... assuming of course that the very small sample, already targeted at those considered to be most at risk, can actually be extrapolated out to include the entire population. OK, 176,000 is a big number, let's take it seriously. The first thing to note is that the vast majority of Covid-19 cases produce symptoms similar to a cold. Of those that are more serious than a cold, the vast majority produce symptoms similar to flu. Of those that are more serious than flu, most sufferers develop very nasty symptoms that can be life-threatening to a minority of the population. And finally you reach the cases that the media are drooling over ... people dying. You can do your own research as to the predicted death rate from Covid-19 for Western Europe and choose which number you prefer. For the moment, I'm sticking with 1% but that may not survive contact with reality ... it might be 0.1% and it might be 5%, nobody knows. Yet. We'll find out quite soon. 1% too cautious for you? Fine, let's run with 5%. That means that the 176,000 cases we (allegedly, based on a dodgy survey) already have might generate 176,000 x 5% = 8800 deaths. Hmmmmmm. Does anyone actually believe that? If at least a month of pandemonium in the most heavily-populated country on Earth (China) has produced fewer deaths than that, why would Brits be dropping like flies? Sounds like b0ll0cks to me. Back to 1% then. Even that would produce 1760 deaths. Unacceptable. Intolerable. Something should be done! We need to change everything so that this can never happen again ... eh? What's that you say, Sooty? There are 363,000 new cases of cancer in the UK every year? And 165,000 of them die every year? Maybe we're focusing on the wrong pandemic here? https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics-for-the-uk And don't forget, children, the proportion infected in China after over a month of this is still nowhere near 1 in 340. Just saying ...
-
I get that Phil, really I do, but that's a bloody big 'if' based on, putting it bluntly, nothing at all. Come to that, if it pans out as badly as the Great Plague of 1665, or (God help us) if it pans out as badly as the Black Death of 1347, or ... but y'know, actually it probably won't. Any sensible practitioner knows that you hope for the best but prepare for the worst. Any news source proprietor knows that you bang on endlessly about the worst case scenario (cos it's so much more exciting than saying "another virus has emerged - we'll be fine") until it fizzles out, then you claim the credit for solving the problem with your 'campaign against viruses'. Any politician, no matter how tiny-minded, corrupt and devoid of principles, knows that you make a big song & dance about how much you're doing to protect the public while looking for a scapegoat against the moment it all goes wrong. Very little of that helps those of us trying to live our daily lives and refusing to believe that the sky is falling, the sky is falling. Yes, we're all going to die, but not tomorrow. I'm not planning to, anyway.
-
Oh I like that, I like that a lot!
-
I remember posting on this subject about ten years ago, and the gist of my post was that you shouldn't use a scale that runs from 0 (no weight at all) to 12lbs (absolute monster) because it's so misleading. Below a certain weight, a bass (or any other instrument) is so light that it might as well weigh nothing. Above a certain weight, a bass is so heavy that it's virtually crippling you as soon you sling the strap over your neck. This will vary for each of us, but for me the two parameters are 5lbs and 10lbs. My 1963 Hofner Violin weighs 5.5lbs and feels light as a feather - I could play it all night and barely notice that I was wearing it. My 2019 Rickenbacker 4003s5 weighs 9.5lbs and I'm doing Pilates the entire time I'm on stage to prevent back trouble. My point? In arithmetic terms, the Rick is nowhere near twice the weight of the Hofner. But in the real world, the Rick feels easily four times as heavy. Anything that weighs over 10lbs gets picked up and just put straight back down again.
-
Refin specialist for a vintage bass
Happy Jack replied to Happy Jack's topic in Repairs and Technical
Erm ... dunno ... what do think it says? I've owned this bass for over 10 years and always seen an abstract pattern. -
And here's exactly the sort of codswallop that we need to be ignoring. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-51699056 Coronavirus: Hospitality industry losses 'in hundreds of thousands' What was actually said? The head of the completely impartial and balanced Hospitality Ulster (who?) claims that cancelling the Six Nations would have "an economic impact ... that we would estimate in the hundreds of thousands". Evidence might have been nice. Some sort of explanation as to the basis for his estimates could have helped. But no, just print quotes from someone we've never heard of that suggest that economic catastrophe is now inevitable. I imagine that his next news release will be to ask the Government for a hand-out to offset the disastrous impact of two people (so far) getting ill in Ireland. Apropos of nothing, and just for context: The UK hospitality sector has reached more than 100 Billion Euros in 2018 with expectations of more to reach in 2019 despite the Brexit consequences and staff shortages. The number of hosting and food services facilities has grown nearly 20% in the last five years providing more than 330,000 working opportunities.
-
And the fretless equivalent is still £400! I guess that removing all those unnecessary frets probably does cost about £112 ...
-
Refin specialist for a vintage bass
Happy Jack replied to Happy Jack's topic in Repairs and Technical
Bwahahahahahahahaha!!! Can't argue with that one ... -
Refin specialist for a vintage bass
Happy Jack replied to Happy Jack's topic in Repairs and Technical
OK, now I'm intrigued ... which bass were you thinking about? -
Refin specialist for a vintage bass
Happy Jack replied to Happy Jack's topic in Repairs and Technical
I'm well aware of the potential downside, but thanks anyway. Si, did you think this was a refin, or am I thinking of another bass? -
Refin specialist for a vintage bass
Happy Jack replied to Happy Jack's topic in Repairs and Technical
-
I have a classic vintage bass with a dodgy finish, and I'm tempted to throw caution to the winds and go for a complete refin ... not something I've ever contemplated before. I'm in Harrow (NW London) so I have easy-ish access to the West End, to the whole swathe of London from Barnet to Richmond, and to the bits of Bucks/Herts that are a bit further out. Is anyone in BC-Land happy to recommend a refin specialist in that zone who I could go and have a chat with?
-
List price of a Serek Mid-Western is currently US$2100 at the factory gate. Get it to the UK and that has probably turned into US$2800. Or, of course, you could buy this: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/serek-Midwestern2-Black-MW2-057-Electric-bass-Serek/153599959774?hash=item23c34562de:g:QFgAAOSwLztdUEwv Bwahahahahahahahahaha!!!
-
I had no idea that Top Pop existed ...
-
I think it's safe to assume that this is intended to be a joke.
-
Perhaps, Phil, perhaps. However, there's a very good reason why offical advice is so often met with cynicism and complacency. It's called History. And most of the comments that I suspect you perceive as negative, on this thread anyway, have nothing to do with official advice and everything to do with attempts to whip up a panic-stricken froth about this. The comment about malaria was a good example of some much needed context for this, as was my referencing the number of road deaths each week in the UK - something that we are not merely complacent about but genuinely proud of: Have you seen the equivalent figures for France or Italy or Spain or ... Coronavirus is merely the panic subject of 2020, much as previously we've had World War 3, the oil running out, everyone dying of AIDS and Herpes, a teen generation succumbing to alcopops (remember them?), the next Ice Age (long overdue), being eaten alive by Ebola, and many many more including previous Coronavirus outbreaks. Without an existential threat to prattle on about, most people don't seem to know how to live, so existential threats are discovered, or dredged up, or exaggerated out of all recognition. Meanwhile, people generally are appallingly bad at understanding statistics or at gauging risk through use of probabilities. Ask any of the 32,000,000 Brits who choose to buy a Lottery ticket regularly. Yes, you read that right. 32m Brits buy a ticket pretty much every week despite this: The chance of winning the National Lottery jackpot is 1 in 45,057,474, according to the Lotto website, while there is a 1 in 7,509,579 chance of getting five numbers plus the bonus ball. To win the Euromillions jackpot there is a one in 1 in 139,838,160 of all your numbers being drawn. People understand what a £22m Jackpot is and how it could change their lives. People don't understand what 1 in 45m really means and how ludicrously unlikely it is that they will be that one lucky person. Similarly, people understand what dying is and they're scared of it. People don't understand how massively the odds are tilted against them dying of Coronavirus, or how urgent it is that a Government as useless and mendacious as the current one must be seen as 'caring' or 'making a difference', so if you tell them that their very lives are at risk they tend to believe you uncritically, without using whatever brain cells or education they may have available. Is Coronavirus real? Yes. Is it bad? Yes. Are people dying? Yes. Do I wish it wasn't happening? Yes. Is it an existential threat? No. Is it a 'game changer'? No. Will it change the way we all live in future? No. Will it get a mention in the history books that will be written in 50 years time? No, apart from a brief reference in the chapter on Panics & Scares Of The Early 21st Century. Sadly, I won't be there to read those books, and anyway I seem to have developed a nasty little cough ...
-
Simple answer - take the bass to a luthier for a set up. Complicated answer - this could be either a trussrod problem or a bridge problem. Trussrod problem If the neck has too great a curve to it, then the action will be too high. If you have to push the strings down by nearly half an inch at the 12th fret then you're bending the strings which will make them sound sharp. If this is the problem, then you need to tighted the trussrod. Do this a quarter-turn at a time, checking the string height after each and every quarter-turn ... softly softly catchee monkey. Bridge problem Judging by your measurements, looks like you have very nearly a straight line going there. If there isn't a problem with the trussrod, that tells you that the bridge has been correctly intonated, but has since moved or been knocked. Have you recently changed the strings, perhaps? Or has the bass been dropped or kicked by accident? Whatever. What you now need to do is to tap the bridge, gently but firmly, on the G side (because the G side is the furthest out of true). You're trying to get the bridge straighter. I recommend using the spine of a fairly heavy paperback book for this. After a few taps, if the intonation is getting worse, then you're tapping in the wrong direction ... tap from the other side. If tapping won't move the bridge, slacken off the strings slightly and try again. If tapping with slightly slackened strings still won't move the bridge, then someone has fixed the bridge with double-sided tape, and quite possibly in the wrong position. In that case, take the bass to a luthier for a set up.
-
Chances are that China now has 100,000 cases of coronavirus. The population of China is 1.4 billion. For the arithmetically challenged, that's 1,400,000,000 people. So a full month into the outbreak, one Chinese in every 14,000 has the disease. Looked at another way, out of every 14,000 Chinese there are 13,999 who don't have it. "Yet", I grant you, "Yet". Some more will get it as time goes by, but at the moment the odds are firmly in favour of humanity surviving this. Not all of those 100,000 will die, of course. The Chinese death rate (if we can believe anything their Government says) is a surprisingly high 5%-ish. Estimates for Europe are suggesting that we will see less than 2%, probably 1%. All statistics change over time. That's the nature of things. But if you were to assume, just for the sake of the argument, that one in every 14,000 Brits were to develop the disease, and that 2% of those affected were to die, it doesn't take long to work out that the extra 80 deaths - each an individual tragedy for someone - would represent two weeks' road deaths. You can't sell newspapers, or garner cheap clicks, by publishing this sort of thing. Far better to fire up the panic-stricken auto-headline generator, tell everyone that (1) we're all going to die, (2) it's all the fault of those slitty-eyed b@st@rds in Chinky-land, and (3) that this may affect property prices in the Home Counties.
- 101 replies
-
- 23
-
-
-
-
Beautiful tone.
-
So I guessed that the 5734 and the 6034 were based on a '57 P and a '60 J, both with 34" scale. So then I guessed that the 5730 and the 6030 were based on ... erm ... a shortscale 30" '57 P and '60 J that never existed. Then I saw the 1930. Oops.
-
Thanks. I feel better now ... I don't need to ask whether it's for sale.
-
Just love that trussrod cover! What does the bass weigh?
-
They said it was Notlob ...