Silvia Bluejay

Thanks Karl, will check them out. Do they sell single strings as well as sets?

I agree with all that has been said about the D'Addarios. Only, I've got the brand new set of flatwound Thomastiks which I wouldn't mind using, if I could find a light-gauge B that fits, without having to buy another complete set.

I forgot to put it in the title.. apologies. Thank you anyway!

If it's flatwound, that'd be lovely, Wayne, thank you , and you can have my Thomastik.

My brand new set of 5 Thomastik-Infeld flatwounds has a .136 B string that I can't use because it doesn't fit the hole in the bridge on my Fortress. I would love to replace it with a (preferably new) flatwound La Bella .128 B string - or anything similar - if anybody has one lying around doing nothing and would like to exchange it with my Thomastik B. Thank you! - Edited for clarity -

Quite apart from requiring removal of the bridge from the body and too much hassle, I'm not sure what such a procedure would do to the chrome or black finish of the bridge(s). I guess I can try again with a Daddario .132, a small file (to be used on the string, not the bore) and some more patience. I'll need to find a single flatwound Daddario B to start with.

Resurrecting this thread because I need more help! I have bought two sets of flatwound strings for my two 5-stringers - the Thomastik and the D'Addario, those identified by the codes helpfully provided by you guys. I installed the D'Addario on the fretless and hit a problem at the very beginning: the B string (.132) only just fitted in the corresponding hole in the bridge on my Corvette, and had to be stripped of the silk covering and filed a little at the bottom end, where it was a little bulkier. The E string was OK but still needed to be rid of most of the silk, while the other strings were all right. Once the work on the fretless was finished, I thought I would double-check the gauge of the Thomastik B string before even touching the second bass, let alone cutting off the old roundwounds - good idea. The gauge of the B is .136, which I now know will not even begin to fit into the hole in the bridge. (I haven't tried, but I assume that all pre-2010 all-in-one Warwick bridges are identical, so if that on the fretless only just managed the .132...) So... anybody know how I could get hold of a flatwound single B string that's no heavier than .130? Thank you all again and sorry for being hopeless!

On Sunday, according to this: [url="http://www.londonbassguitarshow.com/masterclasses.html"]http://www.londonbassguitarshow.com/masterclasses.html[/url]

I have received the label for sending the bass back to them via UPS for free. Plus i've got all the emails we've exchanged. I don't think they could decide that it was my fault, really, but if they do, the CEO will get a massive complaint. I have found Thomann's customer service to be dreadfully slow and inefficient and plan to let the CEO know when the saga is over. I have asked for a full refund in all the documents I'm enclosing. I guess there might be differences between what I paid originally and what I will get back due to the exchange rate with the euro, as they'll refund euros not Sterling.

But they're not coming to the London Bass Guitar Show this March. They're not in the list of exhibitors. Bah humbug.

I was actually planning to tell them! I'm not doing anything wrong or dishonest, just making sure I don't depend on their silly schedules for replacement.

A bit risky too. Fingers crossed.

New twist to this seemingly endless saga - I've had a lightbulb moment and emailed Thomann's Customer Service declaring that I want a full refund. Then I logged on to My Thomann and bought the same bass all over again. In theory, that should ensure a 'replacement' - a new one - arrives more or less at the same time I dispatch the old one back to Thomann. Hopefully. (It even cost me a few pounds less than last time, as the euro appears to have gone down a little against Sterling.) If something goes wrong, I'll find myself with two identical basses...

I'm hoping that's what they will tell me in their answer! They seem to operate a one-email-a-day-per-client policy so conversations are almost unbearably slow, at least for a Londoner used to dealing with scores of emails a day

I made a point of asking them first thing in my email above, as they mentioned at least four weeks' wait in their previous messages - that is, they collect the bass from me, they send it back to Warwick, they wrangle a bit about getting a refund themselves etc. and THEN and only then do they send me a new one. That wouldn't be good enough. I hope they'll clarify.

Another round of emails, and we're stuck at the same point as before. From Thomann: Hi there, Thank you for the email. You can return the guitar for a refund or for a replacement. We need to send the bass back to the manufacturer and claim the damage with them. We can't send you a new bass before you return the faulty one. We can arrange for somebody to collect it , if you can't bring it to the post office. Please let us know what you decide. We are sorry for the inconvenience. --- My reply: If I allow you to collect the bass, how long before you send a new one back to me? Please note that, if you insist on "four weeks", you will be falling foul of European legislation on distance selling. The law requires exchange or refund within a reasonable time, in the case of the manufacturer's fault, so that the customer, who is not at fault at all, is not unduly inconvenienced. Since I need the bass for practising - that's the reason why I bought it in the first place - I CANNOT legally be required to wait more than the two or three days that it took to reach me whan I bought it in the first place. So you either replace it immediately, as I mentioned before, or refund me part of its price and I'll accept to keep the bass as it is, or face a massive legal complaint from me. Please reply promptly. Thank you, Silvia ---------------- I may have been bluffing a bit in my reply, but they're asking for it. Not sure whether to laugh or cry.

[quote name='philparker' timestamp='1326794785' post='1501927'] I know the question has already been answered, numerous times, but I thought I would chip in with my first post after lurking for some time... ...I started off playing with a lined fretless and found myself concentrating on positioning my fingers be line of sight, but since moving to a non-lined ebony fretless playing be ear and moving by muscle-memory and ear is definitely the way to go - and practising pieces to get the right sound. Of course the set up and intonation is much more important on a fretless so it is worth checking it out. [/quote] I totally agree - I wouldn't have wanted a lined fretless, and I've been using the ear+muscle memory on the upright since I took it up. On the upright I had to create an appropriate muscle memory from scratch, while the fretless is (predictably) proving easier to tackle. Thank you all again - you've been fantastic with your help and advice.

[quote name='janmaat' timestamp='1326788652' post='1501818'] Why wait? I mean, it's up to you, but changing bridge height and position on an electric guitar is a simple operation that takes seconds... just make sure you've got the correct tool, and do like 1/4 turn at a time, so you can go back any moment. I would think its's better to just correct that imperfect setup rather than getting used to a wrongly tuned instrument. I find it astonishing how many people are spooked by bridge adjustment - anyone with a tuner and a good ear can do that, it's not harder than tuning the strings from the other end, in my finding. [/quote] Two reasons for waiting - 1. the need for acclimatisation, as it's brand new, and 2. the possibility that Thomann will ask me to exchange the bass as opposed to offer a part refund for a scratch (see this thread: [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/164869-scratch-in-brand-new-warwick-rockbass/"]http://basschat.co.uk/topic/164869-scratch-in-brand-new-warwick-rockbass/[/url]).

LOL Thank you, Geoff, for managing to refrain from pointing out how many double and triple entendres could be found in ras's post

Aw, thank you!

In my case, ends of fingers - tiny but I do hear you, Rob. I'm slowly getting there - it's less daunting than the upright, after all.

Thank you Mark and discreet. No reply yet. I did offer them the option to part reimburse me though, which is by far the cheapest thing they could do without getting into any trouble whatsoever. We'll see.

I don't remember having had to click on their T&C when I purchased. Anyway, I hope they'll be reasonable and avoid a huge storm of bad publicity...

I sent them a further note telling them that I have no own transport and cannot take the big box with the bass to the post office. I'm going to be tough on this.