[quote name='Alemboid' post='6049' date='May 24 2007, 09:15 PM']CK, I thought the machine did put the neck under tension? Can't see that it'd be any use at all otherwise.[/quote]
I've just gone back to my original Bassworld post which offers a little more clarity.
[url="http://basstalk.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=18752&b=1&st=0&p=&#entry"]http://basstalk.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=...p;p=&#entry[/url]
[i]
Nov 4 2006, 01:30 PM
CK:
just came back from Chandler Guitars after taking my Smith 6 down there. They're only a few stops away from me on the District line and I planned to get the bass plekked and put a review on the site.
When I got there, I had a nice chat to their tech, (I think his name was Leon), who told me basically that the machine had a flaw in it and would probably not give me the results I was expecting.
I have to say it was a bit of a surprise. The plek machine takes a measurement of the neck with strings and then again without strings and works out what the neck relief should be given the bending characteristics. However apparently what it doesn't do is allow for the bending characteristics of the truss rod which only affect the neck relief from the 15th fret down. Above that, its up to shimming/microtilt to make sure the fingerboard is parallel to the strings.
If the guy I spoke to registers on BW, I'll let him explain it in a little more detail.
________________________________________________________________________________
Dood: I look forward to hearing more about it! Cheers Steve.
________________________________________________________________________________
CK:
Yeah, he said they've had numerous arguments with the inventor over this flaw. Apparently he invented the machine because he had an Ibanez guitar which noone could set up properly in Germany... :shock: ...this was before he thought that it might be cheaper to just fit a better neck.
Chandlers seem pretty confident they can do a hand crowning that is better than the Plek.
________________________________________________________________________________
Mikey:
Sounds a bit odd :?
I wonder if something 'political' happened when Charlie Chandler left them to set up his guitar experience shop in Hampton Wick - he's still offering plek setups and was apparently 'closely involved with the development of the Plek system, having helped introduce the system to the U.S.A'.
[url="http://www.guitarexperience.co.uk/html/ind...=showpage&pid=2"]http://www.guitarexperience.co.uk/html/ind...wpage&pid=2[/url]
Not that I'd ever take a bass anywhere but the gallery to get the frets done by hand.
________________________________________________________________________________
CK:
Yes the guy I spoke to mentioned that Charlie is a champion of the Plek system still. They had their plek machine sitting in the back of the shop which costs £60,000 to purchase now so I'd imagine if they'd probably still be pretty keen to make money off it if it didn't result in a negative backlash.
I told the guy straight up what I wanted to do by way of review and it might be that he was just being sensible considering that this site gets about 30,000 hits a day. He said that when they started using it, every celeb guitar that came in to be done ended up being refretted pretty shortly after because of the buzz in the upper registers of the neck. Imagine if I got the bass done and then started slagging it off, it would make Chandlers look bad as well as Plek.
All credit to Chandlers for being upfront with me about it.
________________________________________________________________________________
bassbloke:
Funnily enough, even after being plekked, I still had issues with the action of my Jazz. Finally this afternoon I twigged that removing the neck might reveal something interesting and sure enough, there was a piece of plastic being used as a shim.
I duly removed it and I've been able to drop the action right down with next to no buzz.
I'd gotten the impression that there was a period of severeal years between Chrlie Chandler leaving Chandler's music in KEw and setting up his own store in Hampton Wik, where I took mine. Wasn't he working in the states for a while?
________________________________________________________________________________
CK:
Yes, I think he was involved with promoting Plek heavily in the US.
________________________________________________________________________________
Merton:
Chandlers is the only place I'll go for a set up, their other luthier dude is Paul Herman who has done a lot of work for Fender here in the Uk, a bit for Wal (or so i'm told!) plus he builds his own instruments. Never ever had an isue with any of the numerous weird and wonderful set up and repair jobs he's done for me. The man is a genius. And no Plek in sight!
Interesting comments though, especially after other threads on this subject a few months back...
________________________________________________________________________________
JPJ:
As both a failed engineer and someone who sets up his own bass, I have often wondered about the Plek system.
I have tried using all the engineering know-how I have to add 'precision' (no not a fender precision, engineering precision!) to setting up my bass from a repeatability point of view with little or no success.
I have concluded that there are too many variables/factors to consider when setting up a bass, and ultimately, its a feel thing rather than precise science.
The issue I have always had with the Plek idea, is that neck bow under string tension releases in a non-linear way when the string tension is removed (rather the reverse of how a neck settles after new strings are put on your bass). The tension releases significantly at first, but the release continues, albeit at a much slower rate, over a protracted period which can be days or even weeks. The age of the neck wood has a lot to do with this as newer necks release the tension much quicker than older necks. Therefore, the idea of precisely meassuring neck relief before and immediately after tension removal appears to be flawed in my thinking.
________________________________________________________________________________
[/i]
Yep, I own a couple of them which are the newer, more powerful version and they lack for nothing (IMO). What I like most is that I have to decide what to take away from what I hear, not worry about what's missing like I had with the Eden, Trace and SWR heads I used to own. I've used them in gigs up to the Clapham Grand in size with no issues with volume at all. I can also use ALL my basses from the Alembic to the Smith 6 and get very consistent results. Pair one of these with the 210RBH (or even just a normal 2x10") and I get all the warmth plus LOADS of punch and growl at ear bleeding volumes. Have a bump mate
Damn, if I didn't live in a flat with narrow staircases, I'd have snapped this one up. Have a free admin bump.