neepheid

Not played huge places but so far I've not needed more than 350W into a 4 ohm 4x10. Like, turned up to 4. I hope that by the time I have an ego that requires an 8x10 then I'll have a roadie or two to put it in place

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1331826717' post='1579563'] There's a lot of people like yourself who list the gear they use in the signatures so a browse through a selection of threads in this forum and the general Bass Guitars forum should reveal plenty. However I have something which IMO is far important in my sig - a link to my music. [/quote] Ugh, this sounds a bit "holier than thou" I have both, for what it's worth. I guess that just means I take up an annoying amount of space. With that in mind, have a font size reduction and losing one line

In a pinch, an appropriately sized Torx driver (if it exists) can maybe push into whatever corners are left if it's not too far gone. I've used a T27 to move a 5mm stripped hex before - point to point it's 4.99mm.

Stick to facts and it can't be libellous. Keeping it updated will be the challenge. I don't think including fees is a good idea, I'm sure it changes from band to band and from promoter to promoter, and is a private matter in any case.

If I was the seller then I would be ok with the request, but I'd be the one doing the dismantling and testing. It's still mine until the money changes hands after all.

Do you mean this one? [url="http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/130663266551"]http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/130663266551[/url]

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1331723298' post='1577622'] Too right. It's a shame that it's becoming Unobtainium. [/quote] Yup, I'm getting an "in before the lock" feeling about Neodymium also

I can confirm that the DI is post EQ. Now that I've got it hooked up to the USB interface I suppose I should record something...

[quote name='Cosmo Valdemar' timestamp='1331642461' post='1576337'] Surely making such erroneous accusations against an instruments design and function in a major magazine is bordering on libel? [/quote] Perhaps, but one thing's for sure - it's giving us a right good laugh at their expense

Well, I have obtained one of these RedSub 5110 combos. I was waiting for the Thomann one to come back into stock but they kept pushing the date back repeatedly, then they delisted it (although they did say it would be back when quizzed). Certainly it has no problem with practising - got aux in and headphones and sounds dandy at moderate volume levels. I tried it in my wife's studio - it's separate from the house so I could crank it up a bit. I was rattling some pictures on the walls So I took it to a band rehearsal last week, not convinced that it would be able to keep up with drums, guitar and keys. Well, it did. With gain set pretty high but without clipping and the master at about 1 o' clock it was easily audible and the band said they really liked how it sounded. Result! I've got a jam round someone's house tomorrow night and I'm bringing it there. If it handled last week then I'm sure it'll be fine in this setting. I did take the head out of the combo and hook it up to my Zoot 4x10 but it wasn't a very good test - too many rattly things in the room distracting me. Maybe I'll try it outside So, the story will develop, but at this time you can put me down as surprised and impressed so far. Obviously with it being something of the order of half the price of a Promethean something has to give - it's not the prettiest of boxes, the "stand" is a threaded post with a rubber foot that you screw into a hole in the bottom of the combo, the aux in and headphone sockets are 1/4" jacks which means looking for converters when the majority of things that you would plug in there (MP3 players, mobile phones) are 3.5mm jack. Removing the head is not tool free in my experience - the screws do have large slot heads with ridges for grip but they're just way too tight to turn by hand when fully screwed in. Maybe in time they'll free up a bit. Mine also smells a little funky after it's been on for a while - perhaps there's a daub of glue somewhere there shouldn't be. Again in time hopefully this will calm down. The DI is very basic, only a ground lift switch is provided (no pre/post EQ). But it's all little niggles which can be worked around/overlooked. So basically, it sounds good, it's very portable, very flexible and while I'm sure the combo has its limitations in terms of bass projection (also don't put it up against a wall, it's rear ported), it has more than enough oomph to fill a rehearsal room with bass and given the choice between using this at a gig and not playing at all, I know what I'd do.

I'll allow myself a smug "I'm probably going to get a shottie of it before all of you" Seriously though Rich, looks fantastic, can't wait to see it for real (and confirm that it isn't white )

My basses are 1978, 1979, 1981 (2) and 1987 with a couple of young 'uns from this millennium. That makes the oldest one 33 years old. I gig them all on a whim based rotation without question or issue. There aren't really that many moving parts on a bass, you can't really compare it to a car in respect of letting you down mechanically. Look after them and they'll probably outlast you.

I have a BB614 and the blade on the bridge pickup is curved in an attempt to match the radius of the fingerboard and therefore the strings and the pickup as a whole is height adjustable at either side. I have just checked and both sides move up and down when you turn these screws What did they suppose those single screws at either side of the pickup were for? Sounds like a load of ill-informed rubbish to me.

"So many designs" made me chuckle.

Yup, and he probably enjoyed very much the bottles of beer they came from

[quote name='phatkat' timestamp='1330710214' post='1562080'] Just how many Aberdeen/N/E based bass players are there on here? G... [/quote] A few that I know of. I can think of 6 off the top of my head, myself included.

Reading all this makes me realise that I really don't have anything much to worry about, and certainly nothing to complain about. I can get slightly withdrawn (read: less chatty) before the gig (getting in the zone?) - it's worse if there's an unknown variable in the mix like it's an unfamiliar venue or I'm gigging a new bass for the first time. I loosen up with a single drink which I nurse until show time. Then I play, and if people afterwards are saying nice things to me then I'm learning to accept it and not listen to the little voice inside my head whispering that I've got away with it (that is: pulling the wool over everyone's eyes and pretending that I'm a bassist) for another gig. That wasn't fishing for compliments by the way - I am under no illusion that after only 4 years of light gigging and a few months of lessons I still have a long way to go to even approach the levels of competency that I strive for (and see in the players I admire) - the little voice knows this and plays on it.

I would also question why you deem it necessary to go to all this trouble. If it's just a vanity thing (and you may have other reasons - see below) then seriously, I wouldn't bother devaluing your bass in this way. While this might be the last bass you ever own, as your sig says you own three already then I would guess your GAS won't stop here and there will come a time when you want to sell it. I've only done it once - but it was to remove the whole headstock finish rather than a specific requirement to get rid of the Squier logo. It was a silver headstock on a neck which would have looked great on the matching silver body but the body was ... blue. It really wasn't working for me so I removed all the finish from the front of the headstock. I sanded it down to the bare wood with appropriate grades of sandpaper. When I refinished, I masked off the edges and just re-lacquered the front face. Edges were a little rough feeling where the lacquer may have formed a slight ridge along the edge of the masking tape, but they were easily (but carefully) smoothed off. Being a bitsa bass, the whole devaluing thing had already been done quite some time ago I should point out that I put a highly amusing "Fecker Imprecision Bass" logo on it, not a Fender one. No wool being pulled over anyone's eyes here.

[quote name='apa' timestamp='1330864013' post='1563886'] Now this has been bugging me for quit some time. Being a designer / engineer its something that catches my eye so take a look at these pictures............... ... They all have one thing in common which I consider ugly and old fashioned and while being emensly practical and functional it detracts from all that ergonomic and esthetic blood sweat and tears that goes into the design of these beautiful creatures. Im talking about [b]THIS[/b]........................ Even when great lengths are taken to make something esthetic they plonk a thread and nut into it...... There are some designs out there, mostly for acoustic guitars like the ones that double are strap pins and this one........ But 99% of electric instruments that you buy from the £150 Squier Affinity to Mr Ritters £15,000 jobs they all have a thread and a nut stuck on them!! And yes I understand the manufacturing practicalities of such things but its not rocket science to put a similar design to the Neutriks on them. Mr Ritter has no excuse!! That is all. Have a good Sunday A [/quote] At the risk of sounding like I'm at debate club at school... Jack sockets don't bug me at all. To me, there's something comforting and reassuring about the familiarity of a tried and tested design. I don't find the nut/thread obtrusive in the slightest, it's not as if it's the size of a door knob is it? It's easy to fit, easy to adjust within acceptable tolerances and they're available just about anywhere should you need to source a replacement. I had to go to Dundee Maplin to get a replacement barrel jack for instance, because Aberdeen didn't stock them! The pursuit of aesthetics (which is rarely objective in its nature) isn't a good reason to reinvent the wheel. What efficiency savings are we making here? Are barrel jacks easier to fit when it comes to assembly? No, not in my experience anyway. Are barrel jacks more sturdy? Perhaps physically, but when they fail repairs take longer and are more expensive (barrel jack sockets cost more to manufacture and therefore purchase and take longer to remove and replace). Also they're far too long to top load a guitar/bass with. You say the nut/thread of the jack socket affects the ergonomics of the instrument. What makes it unergonomic? Do you hurt your hand on it? Is it difficult to insert the jack plug? The jack socket is tried, tested, reliable and ubiquitous and as such, I'm a big fan of it.

Are you sure there isn't a truss rod? Try looking in the soundhole at the heel of the neck?