Bilbo

Wherever I Lay My Hat - Paul Young Peaches - The Stranglers N.I.B. - Black Sabbath The Rite of Spring - Stravinsky

The notes on the bass clef are actually an octave higher than the notes on the bass itself (i.e. the note you play is an octave lower than the note written on the stave as it would be heard on a piano). The first ledger line above the stave is an octave below middle C (5th fret on your G string). The open E string is one ledger line below the stave. It had to be complicated., didn't it?

I have an old John Patitucci transcriptions book somewhere that uses tenor clef. Didn't get it at the time so that's why I don't play like John Patitucci.... What?

No - then it would Cmajor sharp 5 flat 9 to C altered dominant with a G in the bass.

I assme 'both' means bass and treble clefs not tenor/alto clefs?

Just a thought that came to me yesterday when I was looking at an Orchestration book..... What is the 'industry standard' way for writing/reading staff notation for ERBs? If you just used a bass clef you would, by my reckoning, have about 8 ledger lines at the top and four at the bottom rendering the whole thing unusable. So, what do you do? Do ERB players use bass and treble clef or bass and tenor/alto clefs or is the area so new that there is no standard. Just curious.

When I play it, its C then G - OK?

C then G, actually.

As has already been implied, I think the answer is that both books are right but neither is perfect. As for which is better? I don't know either book but I suspect the answer is neither. Your role as a student is not to passively consume what is thrown at you but to look at it, consider it, process it, try stuff out and, when it feels right, discard some of it, even if it is only temporarily. I mentioned it elsewhere but you need to develop a critical sense that allows you to establish what is useful to you in serving your musical ambitions and what is a dead end. Quick wins are few and the most useful learning is incremental. Most people I know have several books that often include similar information presented in different ways - your own learning style will determine which ones work for you but, for me, the strategy is to look at as much of this stuff as you can and absorb what you can when you can. There is no yellow brick road to musical knowledge, just a big haystack you need to sort through.

Speed is for athletics not music. Anyone who aspires to this type of achievement is labelling themselves a complete idiot.

[quote name='OldGit' post='294345' date='Sep 29 2008, 09:48 AM']Ok some research needed .. What might be the best Jeff Berlin tracks to listen to?[/quote] 'Palewell Park' off Bruford's 'Gradually Going Tornado' 'Tokyo Dream' off Allan Holdsworth's 'Road Games'

I reckon its the colour of the strings that you are reacting to. The harmonies during the opening are diatonic and the voicings are in unison. The fact is that the tone/timbre of something can have a massive effect on its emotional content. If it sounds beautiful, it is beautiful.

THere is some conceptual promise here, Shergold. Its raw as f*** but, if its your first go at something like this, you haev sone remarkably well. Have you seen Samuel Adler's 'Orchestration' book, or Walter Piston's, or Schoenberg's? You should start exploring this stuff.

Just got a listen in. Its a great transcription but you still sound uncomfortable with the piece and your phrasing is a little awkward. Some of that will be because you are playing as a written piece something that someone else has improvised. But, nevertheless, you need to work on some of your core techniques and tighten things up a bit. But, otherwise, a great exercise and all credit to you for trying something that ambitious! Well done that man!

I actually have more guitars than basses (4:2 ratio) and also have a piano I am messing about with (as much as a midi controller as an instrument in its own right). The study of music is what matters here not the study of technique. The greatest composer/instrumentalists in jazz are nearly all multi-instrumentalists. Mingus played piano (inc recording LPs) as does drummer Jack DeJohnette, who has recorded on the instrument many times. Pat Metheny writes on piano. Guitarist Birelli Lagrene plays great Jaco influenced bass whilst bassists Dave Holland and Jack Bruce both play cello. Trumpter Wynton Marsalis plays piano whilst drummer Omar Hakim has played guitar on Weather Report cds. The list goes on and on. I would recommend all bass players play either guitar or piano as an undersatnding of chords is central to your ability to play great bass lines. No need to achieve virtuoso level, just enough to be able to hear stuff!

Benavent rocks! First heard him on a Gil Goldstein 'Zebracoast' cd several years ago. Will check out the link later.

I think it depends on the gig. A great drummer on a great sounding acoustic kit would probably out do an electric kit in most situations but a great drummer on an electric kit is likely to do the job perfectly satisifactorily in many situations and, more importantly, will probably out perform a weak player n a great kit If your drummer friend can play, move past the prejudice and go for it. I lose jazz gigs to weak acoutsic bass players all of the time. When its aesthetics vs musiciality, the musicality should win everytime. Try it, You might like it.

Never liked Abe, I'm afraid, but I think its because I never really liked anything that he played on (its mostly fuzak).

Robert Palmer plays in mine. Regularly.

[quote name='Happy Jack' post='290804' date='Sep 24 2008, 01:01 PM']Bilbo, you just don't know when to stop stirring, do you? [/quote] Moi?

Just a small point on Jon Anderson's lyrics. As a Yes fan through the 80s, (I came to it around the time of the 'Tormato' LP), I am familiar with everything they did up to '90125' and could probably recite acres of Anderson lyrics without any effort. There has always been this thing about how s*** his lyrics were and how they didn't make sense. The thing is, they weren't supposed to. Anderson long ago made it know that his concept was to string together words that sounded pretty/poetic etc i.e. the sound of the word was as important as, if not more important than, its meaning. The meaning of his lyrics is, therefore, impressionistic rather than a narrative. If you bear that in mind, it all makes a bit more sense (or not, depending on what you mean). As I understand it, Jon Anderson's lyrical concept is not a million miles away from James Joyce's 'Ulysses'. Yes played some really great music and although some of it got a bit bloated sometimes, much of it was highly original and innovative. 'Going For The One' was always a favourite for me.

Whatever your thoughts about Prog Rock and Yes lyrics (!), Squire was (and remains) an original voice on his instrument. He influenced a generation of bass players including Geddy Lee of Rush and has produced some pretty incredible stuff in the Yes discography. And all with a pick! Being compared to him should very much be considered a compliment.

[quote name='noelk27' post='290852' date='Sep 24 2008, 02:02 PM']The ambition of any songwriter has to be the creation of a homogeneous entity and not a collection of individualist parts.[/quote] Absolutely - a great bass line on a bad piece of music is like polish on a turd. Its nice and shiny now but, when it comes down to it, its still a turd!

[quote name='Bass_In_Yer_Face' post='290782' date='Sep 24 2008, 12:37 PM']I don't get The Beatles either....I think The Stones & The Who were better[/quote] Now the Stones - bad bass lines AND bad songs. Hell of an achievement.