Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Jakester

⭐Supporting Member⭐
  • Posts

    1,441
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jakester

  1. Ah, interesting! Good job I said happy to be corrected!
  2. They're both class D. Looked identical with the covers off and side to side. I *think* all the LMIIIs (and therefore the Combo Head II's which is basically a LMIII) were class D (though happy to be corrected), the only differences between early and later ones being they started off being built in Italy but production then went to Indonesia. LMII's were class A/B and if I see one going cheap I may pick it up.
  3. If you have a reasonably decent speaker like a Yamaha DBR12, give it a go, it may surprise you, and it ain't going to cost you anything. As mentioned upthread, the DXRs are great - we use 12's as our FOH and 10's for monitoring and they sound great.
  4. Right, I've said feck it and just bought a replacement (very) used MB LMIII head. Immediately it seems louder and cleaner for the given input so hopefully that will cure the issues. It was at the cheaper end of cheap so if that goes too, it won't be devastating but I think it will signal the end of my involvement with MB amps! I'll probably keep the combo cab though, just rip the head out and use something else.
  5. I have an NY121 to pair with my CMD121P. It hasn't been used much simply because with the combo it pushes so much air that it will cover most things up to a full on rock band. When I have used the extension cab it's like there's a bottomless well of limitless oomph. I mean, clearly it isn't bottomless or limitless, but it's certainly able to cope with loud rock gigs without overtaxing the amp. I tend to find MB cabs to be 'clean' ish - I've not played the BF110 but gather they are 'voiced' when compared to the Compact etc, so bear that in mind. I suspect the BF110 would be lighter than the NY121 if weight is an issue.
  6. I have one and I've thought about it after playing a friend's actual proper full fat DB and realising the neck on that was much easier to play than the EDB! I reckon it would probably be money chucked away though - the cost of getting it done is never going to be recouped on sale.
  7. Is it not better to ask for forgiveness rather than permission, though? I mean, why go looking for trouble...
  8. I wonder if that’s because you’re their best customer though?! 😛
  9. Yep, I've found ordering off their website to be very hit and miss. I ordered something that was in stock, only to be told after the transaction went through, I'd have to pay additional postage. I asked why, and they said it was a bundle deal. When I pointed out that wasn't clear when ordering, they said tough, and I'd have to pay the additional if I wanted the item. No apology for the unclear entry on the website. Their website is shambolic at best. Having a functioning website for online sales seems a minimum these days. Coupled to quite an arsey attitude from staff on the occasions I've been in in person - for example, ridiculing the brand I came to look at/try out, and suggesting I have a warranty returned/repaired amp instead (as clearly they wanted to get rid) didn't sit that well, or getting all huffy on another occasion when I asked to try a bass I was considering buying (having travelled 2 hours to get there!), almost like they were doing me a favour rather than a customer looking to buy something from them. They're certainly no longer my first port of call for stuff.
  10. Yeah, can't see them agreeing to deal with it over a year after I've had it..
  11. Thanks, I’ll take a look. Hopefully it’s something so simple but I doubt it!
  12. Well, they said they power soaked it through a number of cycles and it didn’t show any problems. I had said the power stage seemed fine as I’d played via the effects loop in with no problems so I don’t know exactly what tests they carried out. I presume they don’t have someone playing constantly in the workshop! In fairness to them, I have dug the invoice out and I had actually overstated the cost of repair - it was £124, rather than £180 (I think in my irritation I overinflated the cost!) but I did have to pay for tracked insured courier to them so that was another £20. They did contact me and discuss what they proposed to do might s well have been speaking Swahili so I just said “carry on!” TBH had they suggested a full replacement I probably would have said yes. Frustrating as when it works, it’s a great amp which does everything I need. However, if it can’t be relied upon, then it’s going to have to go.
  13. They didn’t, but I’d be very surprised if they didn’t actually change them out! I’ll see if I can find that company. TBH just feel like chucking the head and using the cab with another amp…
  14. So I have a Markbass CMD121P that I had to send away to Real Electronics just over a year ago. It’d starting dropping in volume, then coming back, and some farty popping and banging every now and then. Sent it off to Real, they said there was nothing wrong with it but they replaced all the pots anyway and charged me £180 for the privilege. But miffed but assumed they knew what they were talking about. Anyway, the gremlins are back. Some problems as before - sudden drops in volume, farts and pops and stuttering. I will drop RE a line but not expecting much as they have a 30-day warranty on repairs. Before I take an axe to the head, can anyone suggest a) a potential cause of the problems and b) any alternative repairer?
  15. Dunno what finish yours, is, but there's one cheapish here: https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/900353304003033
  16. I did have one that came with the kit - it was okay. Die-cast hoops so decently meaty. I put a wooden batter hoop on it too. I tend to mix and match snares though so rarely use a 'matching' snare.
  17. The Renowns are great kits. I had one of the first into the UK - it was my first kit I'd bought myself (thanks student loan!) and sounded amazing. Only downside then was a lack of 'add-on' toms - I ended up getting some made for me to match out of Keller shells. A couple of pics of my old kit, and one of it being used in the studio:
  18. Soundcraft arrived today - sounds great, much quieter preamps. Interesting,y the sound ‘out of the box’ wasn’t as pre-eq’d as the Behringer, which suggests there is an element of tailoring to the cheaper mixer. It does weigh a bleeding ton though - feels heavier than my old Yamaha MG/16 and similar sized Mackie I had for a while. Seems the ‘compact’ part of my brief has rather gone by the wayside but it should cover everything but the largest gigs. One really weird feature though which I can’t really fathom is the lack of on/off switch - plug it in, and it’s on straight away. No idea why they’d do that…
  19. Thanks - yep, that was the one I was going to go for!
  20. Just to come back to this, I think part of it was I hadn’t done a deep enough dive! It depends how many channels and what spec you go for - the smaller channelled mixers from SC didn’t have more than one, the Mackie all the way up to a 12 channel don’t. As you and others have said the A&H does but it’s v expensive.
  21. Well, for anyone that’s interested the Behringer is going back. Had the opportunity to set it up and have a play over Christmas and it’s so noisy as to be unusable. There’s a continuous high pitched (around 1.7khz) hiss which is unaffected by any EQ or the gain pots, and then random clicking and popping artefacts which just ‘happen’ with no input. Really not good enough. It’s a shame, as the effects were actually really good. I know Behringer suffered from a bad reputation for live sound gear but I thought they’d gone past that - certainly my XR18 had been great. So, back in the market for something else - the A&H looks good but is really £££. Current fave possible is a Soundcraft Signature 10 which seems around the same size as the ill-fated Behringer but has more auxes…
  22. Nope, I disagree. If you have bought decent gear and there’s nothing in that particular piece of gear’s manual saying you need to get it serviced or tested regularly then, absent some known fault to which you turned a blind eye, you would probably be fine. For example I’m pretty sure there is nothing in my Markbass amp manual saying it needs to be serviced or tested [edit: or, rather, needing regular servicing - it actually says “Refer all servicing to qualified service personnel. Servicing is required when the apparatus has been damaged in any way, such as power-supply cord or plug is damaged, liquid has been spilled or objects have fallen into the apparatus, the apparatus has been exposed to rain or moisture, does not operate normally, or has been dropped” ] likewise my Yamaha powered PA speakers. Indeed, it would probably be worse if you had it tested once and then didn’t do it again, since you might be deemed to be aware of the need for testing but didn’t bother. If there WAS something saying you need to have it serviced, but you don’t, and that item then causes loss or damage, you *might* be in trouble, but only if it was unreasonable for you not to have had it serviced, and that lack of servicing was a causative factor in any damage. Basically you owe a duty of care to take reasonable precautions against loss and damage. If the operating manuals for your gear don’t say have it serviced, then you’re probably fine as it would be a reasonable step to comply with the manufacturer‘s recommendations. Insurance almost certainly won’t say you need proof of testing - it will say comply with manufacturer’s recommendations if it says anything like that at all. For info I’m a lawyer of 15 years’ post qualification experience and spent 10 years of my career dealing with claims for insurers and advising insurers on coverage, of which many were PI claims.
  23. The worst thing was they did look absolutely hilarious - it was like something from the Bugsy Malone, only with knives. No one dared crack a smile though!
×
×
  • Create New...