Darkglass Anagram

[attackbass]

It's not necessarily to do with the anagram, I've been feeling this was about the QC for a while but decided to stick it out for a while with the QC. It's great but underused features why. Its almost like I just want less stuff haha

 

The QC is amazing but probably overly complicated for my needs and with some effects I struggle to get the sounds I want or find how some of them interact with my basses I just can't get the sounds I expect from them. Most notably from the filters.

 

It would be to free up some cash and either at some point go with an anagram or actually just buy a few nice pedals and a tuner.. the Anagram would probably make sense due to the range of drives and also the extra effects that I would use sporadically.

 

I've got a whammy, a phaser and an aftershock already sitting in boxes that all do the job. Would maybe opt for a Dunlop Chancellor Wah, MXR vintage bass octave, possibly a comp to add to that but then I love the clean set up of the QC and dislike my OCD with builinf pedalboards.

 

Let's face it I can do pretty much all my gigs with my bass, tuner and sansamp.

[Greg Edwards69]

14 hours ago, tayste_2000 said:

 

Anagram doesn’t have a phaser currently, just an FYI

IIRC, marco said one is coming in that interview with IMA

[joeabass]

I’ve gigged it for a couple of weeks now on its own. It’s excellent. Even in its current form, although I do wish midi functionality had been sorted at launch. I much prefer the interface and sounds (for bass) compared to QC and stomp…. Like I’ve said before I’m absolutely aware you can dial in great sounds for both as I’ve had both but I just don’t want to sit and tinker. I’m going to dive into the NAM side of things next and see how that goes as the ones that are in the anagram as standard sound very good  

[MrDinsdale]

Anyone tried creating a NAM profile?

 

I’ve done AIDA-X captures in the past and it was a real pain with reamp boxes and trying to sync audio signals to offset latency etc.

 

I dont need on-device capturing but an easy workflow is a deal breaker for me. Will have to have a go if I get a mo. 

[tayste_2000]

2 hours ago, Greg Edwards69 said:

IIRC, marco said one is coming in that interview with IMA

Oh I know, but currently it doesn’t and we have no timeline for when it will.

 

Bluetooth he said I hope I’m not too optimistic but it should be a couple of months.

 

Audio over USB was pulled last minute before release, but it’s had 3? firmware updates so far and it’s not there.

 

I’m sure it will all be there, just we don’t know when and if you NEED one of these features you should hold off getting it for now imho

[MichaelDean]

6 hours ago, MrDinsdale said:

Anyone tried creating a NAM profile?

 

I’ve done AIDA-X captures in the past and it was a real pain with reamp boxes and trying to sync audio signals to offset latency etc.

 

I dont need on-device capturing but an easy workflow is a deal breaker for me. Will have to have a go if I get a mo. 

There's an easy(ish) method on the Tone3000 website. Download an audio file, send that through the gear, upload the recording and they work it out. I guess you'd need to do a bit of matching, but it shouldn't be too bad. 

 

https://www.tone3000.com/capture

[MrDinsdale]

15 minutes ago, MichaelDean said:

There's an easy(ish) method on the Tone3000 website. Download an audio file, send that through the gear, upload the recording and they work it out. I guess you'd need to do a bit of matching, but it shouldn't be too bad. 

 

https://www.tone3000.com/capture

Cool will have to give it a go. I'm sure I can get a little template set up in logic with all the correct routing etc and see how it compares.