Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

Wireless IEMs: Xvive U4 & alternatives


Al Krow

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, EBS_freak said:

I wouldn't be going near it... I'd wager it's got a woeful compander on board for that kinda money. But... you know, for the money, it may be worth a punt...? It may be a hidden gem.

 

But... if you want to use on a free to use frequency range... or the shared mic license range, you'll need the 830.000 to 866.000 MHz range that they seem to manufacture for - and operate in 863-865 to remain legal (channel 70). You'll also be able to use 830-832 (as part of the 823-832 shared mic license range).

823-832 is technically classed as Ch38 although of course it is not CH38. Sane prices and tests toons apply but for £75 per year you are almost guaranteed  no interference from the free CH70 (863-865MHz) bands WiFi or XVive etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Chienmortbb said:

823-832 is technically classed as Ch38 although of course it is not CH38. Sane prices and tests toons apply but for £75 per year you are almost guaranteed  no interference from the free CH70 (863-865MHz) bands WiFi or XVive etc.

It isn't technically classed as Ch38 at all. It's 65/66. It's covered under the "shared mic license", which covers both ranges of the spectrum covered by Ch38 and CH65/6.

Ch 65/6 is actually pretty noisy.

 

Only reason that I am being pedantic, is that this stuff is hard enough for people new to radio to understand without putting statements in saying 823-832 is channel 38. It's just that its licensing is covered by the same license as that of Ch38.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Chienmortbb said:

Except that the man/woman that control’s the FOH sound is not an Engineer. Yes I know I am a pedant but if there was a degree in sound mixing it would be a BA not a BSc. 

The art of understanding wave theory is defo more in the science space than the arts space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just putting this out there as a possibility, given I'm a bit of a fan of the Boss WL-20 wireless for bass these days (having previously been a Smooth-hound wireless fanboi).

 

The Boss WL-30 and/or Xvive U3 - could these simply be used in reverse to provide the transmitter / receiver base for a wireless IEM set up? Would they be any good? Is that effectively all the Xvive U4 is doing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Al Krow said:

The Boss WL-30 and/or Xvive U3 - could these simply be used in reverse to provide the transmitter / receiver base for a wireless IEM set up? Would they be any good? Is that effectively all the Xvive U4 is doing?

 

The XVive U3 is just the XVive u4 transmitter with a different form factor receiver.

 

I got a replacement U4 now, turns out my transmitter failed so I have one transmitter and 2 receivers!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Woodinblack said:

 

The XVive U3 is just the XVive u4 transmitter with a different form factor receiver.

 

I got a replacement U4 now, turns out my transmitter failed so I have one transmitter and 2 receivers!

 

So you've not lost faith in the U4s then? Good to hear! 

 

U4 transmitter plus 2 receivers is actually one of the purchase options. Makes good sense if two band members are happy to have the same mix eg a full band mix. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Al Krow said:

So you've not lost faith in the U4s then? Good to hear! 

 

No, stuff can happen and it took a while before it went wrong. Obviously if it went wrong again I would. 

 

1 hour ago, Al Krow said:

U4 transmitter plus 2 receivers is actually one of the purchase options. Makes good sense if two band members are happy to have the same mix eg a full band mix. 

 

Yes, it does work with 2 if you want to share, but I don't really in my current group. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 08/11/2022 at 10:54, Adee said:

Guess it depends what works for you, I can sing and pitch my backing vocals much much better with my IEM's

we have a totally silent stage with everyone using Helix, Pod Go or similar, drums are Roland electric, we do have a

sub and top at the rear so I get enough back from that, the FoH as well as my in ears to keep me happy

 

and still happy with my U4 also no clashes with my bass wireless

 

On 30/11/2022 at 21:31, Woodinblack said:

No, stuff can happen and it took a while before it went wrong. Obviously if it went wrong again I would. 

 

Yes, it does work with 2 if you want to share, but I don't really in my current group. 

 

Do you both plug your Xvive transmitters directly into your desks or are you using a short cable to keep the transmitter away from the desk to minimise any noise interference?

 

I've seen a YT clip suggesting that might be a good idea and was wondering whether it was something either or both of you do? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I do but not to keep it a distance away from the desk, just because I have a X18 (not an XR18), and the output aux sockets are TRS plugs, so I have a number of short orange TRS plug to XLR sockets so that me and the drummer can plug into the socket (save looking round the back. My lead is a bit shorter so we know which is which, but the U4 sits on top of the mixer anyway.

 

As you can see on the bottom right of this:

IMG_4336.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

@Woodinblack - grateful if I can pick your brains as I suspect you'll know the answer to this one!

 

Singer has just picked up a Xvive U4 but has been getting a high pitch background buzz. I've just checked with some of my kit and I'm getting exactly the same, whatever setting or channel its on. It substantially disappears if I grip the connector at the 1/4 end (as per the pic), so it seems to be some sort of earthing issue?

Is this something you've encountered and / or is there an obvious fix?

If it's not something you've experienced with either of your two units, I'm guessing it could just be a faulty unit?

 

DSC_1790.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have never had a high pitched buzz on the XVive, but I have had a high pitched buzz on a wireless to the Zoom B1 (when it was plugged in) and on a different wireless. In all cases I found that putting a longer lead between the the wireless and mains powered device on a longer lead got rid of it. My XVive hangs out the back of my X18, but it is on the end of a 9" cable.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My money is on faulty. Send it back. If you cant use it under normal conditions it’s either not worth it, or broken. 

Id have said maybe the Boss is interfering with it, being so close, but if your singer has already tried everything it has nothing to do with your set up IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Woodinblack said:

I have never had a high pitched buzz on the XVive, but I have had a high pitched buzz on a wireless to the Zoom B1 (when it was plugged in) and on a different wireless. In all cases I found that putting a longer lead between the the wireless and mains powered device on a longer lead got rid of it. My XVive hangs out the back of my X18, but it is on the end of a 9" cable.

That seems to have done the trick, thanks Woody. Our singer will be pleased and I'm obviously relieved as she bought it off the back my recommendation based on our discussions on this thread, haha!

So I presume that's actually an interference hum rather than an earthing issue?

 

Edited by Al Krow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Al Krow said:

That seems to have done the trick, thanks Woody. Our singer will be pleased and I'm obviously relieved as she bought it off the back my recommendation based on our discussions on this thread, haha!

So I presume that's actually an interference hum rather than an earthing issue?

 

Its actually can be sort of like both, but a short length of cable works as a bit of a high frequency filter.

Anyway, good that it is no longer causing an issue. I am a great fan of those.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Woodinblack said:

 

Its actually can be sort of like both, but a short length of cable works as a bit of a high frequency filter.

Anyway, good that it is no longer causing an issue. I am a great fan of those.

 

Just to clarify when you say "great fan" that's of short cables acting as a high frequency filter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Al Krow said:

 

Well that's even better to know! Does seem that users of the Xvive U4 on this thread are generally a pretty happy bunch! 

We have two members of the band using them now. No interference issues with either. 

I noticed the other day there are Xvive IEM’s as well. Not heard much talk about them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dave_bass5 said:

We have two members of the band using them now. No interference issues with either. 

I noticed the other day there are Xvive IEM’s as well. Not heard much talk about them. 

 

You mean the XVive U4 IEMs that we are talking about here or something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, EBS_freak said:

@dave_bass5- I think your thoughts ran away with you. Are you talking about the standard wireless (for instruments?)

No, I mean the actual in earbud’s, not the wireless system.  Not sure where I saw them, but I was surprised that I did as I haven’t seen them on the Xvive website. 

Edited by dave_bass5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...