rwillett

Never use one word when you can use 57 and the client is paying.

Rather than "cheated" I would argue that you used "Directed research utilising previous knowledge work through guided, specialist and dedicated tools to optimise the search path, there by reducing false positives, ensuring audited and critical analysis, to deliver the goal oriented conclusion that met the stated target objectives". Who would have guessed I used to work in management consulting?

I loved the Culture novels. I like the idea if naming this using that style a lot.

Close....

I'll just leave this here...

T'other half saw Blondie at The Piece Hall last week. She said it was a great gig and the venue was fantastic. I have to confess I thought The Piece Hall was a trendy liberal left wing name "The Peace Hall" with, no doubt the Nelson Mandela bar, and had to forcibly reeducated by t'other half. In my defence I am normally the (not quite) trendy liberal lefty in our house.

Like the idea of a video and audio review, go for it

The Dog and Duck will know what's hit it ... pitchforks, tar and torches will be pulled out of their storage cupboards, strategically placed just for this type of problem.

There's two for sale still, fill your boots 😊

Not sure if this is the right place to ask but here goes.... My daughter turns 18 this year and we're looking to hire a band for her birthday which is Fri 20/9/24. It would be in a friends large tent somewhere near Sedbergh in Cumbria, I'm being a little vague as I actually have no idea myself where our friend lives, buts it's on a farm in that general area. She's heavily into Oasis and Blue and all that sort of stuff, but we're not looking for an Oasis or Blur tribute band, but a band that can play some of the of their numbers but can also play anything to get a group of kids (and parents) on their feet having fun. Personally speaking I'd prefer 25-30 years older, but it's not my 18th so I get no say. A band with energy and fun is more important to us than note perfect. This is a fun evening for everyone including, hopefully, the band as well. There will be a DJ for afterwards and people will be camping. The date is pretty fixed as she's 18 on 20/9/24 and she's playing rugby 22/9/24 and it's a big game. She's her fathers daughter. The last time I booked a band was U2 and they cost me £999 at Leciester Poly. Yep it was that U2 We also booked Gary Glitter but don;t talk about that now. I have no idea on stage size, power availability (but there will be some, I'd assume 13A/240V rather than three phase) or anything else at the moment. I would assume you'd need to bring everything you need, there certainly won't be a PA to jack into, I'd expect a small intimate arena rather than Wembley. The one thing that will be certain is that I won't be joining you on the stage playing bass so thats one less thing to worry about. If all this hasn't put you off yet, then PM me please with what you can do and costs. We know that people need to be paid and we're not going down the "play for exposure crap" route, sensible costs would be good. Thanks Rob

After a fair few hours with the Prusa Mk4, I can confidently say that the firmware integration with Octoprint is a f***ing joke. There are so many gotcha's about how Prusa have made it difficult to integrate that it is utterly pointless even trying to make it work if you want to do pauses or change filament. Just to be clear this is 100% the fault of Prusa who are being utter d1ckh3ads about integration. Prusa are claiming that they are working on the integration but being a cynical git, my money is that they are trying to push the childlike PrusaLink into the Octoprint area and will try and moneterise it. At the momnent PrusaLink is a broken childs toy and Octoprint is a professional system that works exceptionally well. PrusaLink looks neat but has almost no functionality and is so slow on uploads. I've abandoned Octoprint for a the moment on the MK4, it's still on the MK3, and am seeing if PrusaLink can even do simple stuff. There are also lots of issues with the MK4 filament sensor. It does not play well (or at all) with Octoprint and is a very big step back from the MK3 filament sensor which just worked. Somebody at Prusa cocked up big time with the new Hall Effect sensor which half the time just doesn't work. I've an open ticket with Prusa over this and if the MK4 keeps playing up, its going back. I suspect my lawyers, "Sue, Grabbit and Run" may get involved at some time. Rob

And I thought I had bad luck with kit. Can you let me know where you live and when you travel so I can be as far away as possible please? Theres a song in here somewhere...

The Pi 4is fine for non GUI use, so make it a proxy server or an Octoprint server (TBH it's over powered for an Octoprint) or anything where it doesn't need to run a large GUI. A retro games server, it's also a pretty good file server if you can get a decent NVME or SSD on it. The Pi 4 is a lot more powerful than the Marvel chip I had in my Synology server, I reckon my washing machine had a faster CPU. No issues as a webserver or to learn python or whatever you fancy. Rob

Didn't know that. That could be an expensive mistake to make

Spot on....

If you can, get an Octoprint server setup. A cheap PI 3 is more than adequate. Saves a lot of time and makes a massive difference. @SamIAm is spot in with her description. First thing I did after unpacking the printer and before I even plugged it in was to setup a Raspberry Pi as an Octoprint server.

I have a 3d scanner but not set it up yet. It was Kickstarter from last year. It's on the list but making a bass took priority

It is very quick. Just printed at 0.1mm layer, best it can do and the quality is very, very good indeed. This Input Shaping is quick and good. Still need to play and explore the limits.

I even checked this with my accountant and she was happy about it. The Pi 5 is the first Pi that is actually fast enough for day to day usage and not a toy desktop. The Pi 3 is a great Octoprint server and the Pi 4 even better. I use the 4 for Astrophotography and its fine for controlling loads of things like cameras and mounts. I have tried each of them for desktop use, and you could use the Pi 4 for ssh work and it was fine. The moment a GUI was put on, down it went in performance. The 5 works well, still nowhere near as fast as a good Windows or Mac machine, but it's about £80 from memory. I'd still like a 16GB version though. I'd always go more memory over more CPU power. If anybody wants an Arduino R3, lightly used, let me know and I'll pop it in the post. Rob

This is my R&D budget agreed with the business. I will admit that I own and run the business, so I approved the R&D request. I did ask some pretty difficult questions of myself to justify the time and money though. It wasn't an easy decision and I had to weigh the pro's and con's up. Business is tough these days.

IMG_2667 V2.mov here's how quick it is. No idea how to reformat it in the thread so it's smaller. I downsized it to 480pts on my Mac but not sure how to make it tiny here. Rob

I have finally managed to get some progress on the winder, its basically a number of sideways steps but at least they are not backwards I got an Arduino R4 (with Wifi no less) to see if the increase in speed would help driving the stepper motors at a faster speed. I decided that simply moving to the R4 from the R3 was too easy, so decided to move my dev environment from an old Macbook (2013) to a Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB) but running a CF card and not an NVE so speeds a bit slow. However it's a proper UNIX box and is dedicated to this. I also decided not to use the Arduino IDE and move to the command line and Emacs. I feel a lot happier with a decent editor and TBH prefer the command line. Its just a quicker way of working with Emacs as you rarely take the hands off the keyboard. Pretty simple as well, I've only taken 30 years to learn it properly. The issue then was that nothing worked on the R4, no LCD display, no keyboard input, no stepper motors. It turns out that the R4 breaks a lot of Arduino libraries. So I started with a blank sketch and simply got the LCD to work. That took a little bit of fiddling about but that worked. The next step was to get the keypad to work. No matter what I did, it looked like random key presses coming down the line. Turns out the R4 has a different set of resistors on their circuits and a simple fix (that took a long time to find) was all that was needed and then I had keypad AND a display. Motors were a pain and nothing worked. It turns out that the AccelStepper library which is pretty much a standard doesn't work at all.It also appears that not many people are using an R4 with stepper motors, but a couple of people responded to my plea for help and a pointers to a working library and I ended up with MobaTools, a library aimed at model railways Their sample sketch also included a wifi server to control the R4 from a website, after a few attempts to get the stepper motor pins right on the CNC Shield and in the code, I got motors to turn, not only did they turn, they turned fast. I managed to go from 6 revs / sec to approx 20 revs / second. Thats 1200RPM. There is no load and nothing else happening so unlikely to keep that speed but thats 3x the max I got from the R3, so I'm a very happy bunny. I need to merge all of the different bits of code together and see if it still works, thats the forward step Rob

The auto leveling works very well. The setup consists of tapping the cold nozzle with your finger tip and that was it. It only checks the bed level for the area being printed as well. So that's nice. There already is a replacement firmware that might address the display issue and lack of code. I thought I'd wait at least 24 hours after getting before I hacked the firmware around 😊 It looks like the filament sensor is a big issue for a lot of people. It's been reported on the Prusa Original XL. They start at twice the price of a MK4 and go up a lot more depending on number of print heads. They are enormous though. I'm struggling to understand why it's such a problem but clearly Prusa haven't solved it. Rob

I've just taken delivery of a Prusa MK4 to replace one of my MK3S+ 3D printers. A quick heads up in case anybody is thinking of buying one. I've done a load of test printing and there's good and bad. The good is the speed and the quality. It's so much faster than a MK3S+, nearly twice as fast on some pieces. The quality also looks very good indeed. There are new things such as Input Shaping that I haven't got my head around yet, but I'll learn. The bad is that Prusa appear to have deliberately crippled Octoprint to work with it. Octoprint acts as a print server, normally runs on something a Raspberry Pi and provides a fabulous wealth of plugins for users such as emails when the print is finished or when filament needs changing. Octoprint can also drive the front panel of a MK3S+ so you can see how long is left and other usefyk stuff. Prusa doesn't support the specific gcode for that, so the front panel on Mk4 looks very simplistic (see above). It was supported so I think Prusa is pushing towards Prusalink, they can forget that as I'll simply reuse an old tablet for the display and ignore the front panel. There also appears to be a long running issue over the filament sensor not working properly. It detects the filament is out but sometimes doesn't recognise the replacement filament and keeps saying put it in. I had it twice when I tested it but not actually reoccurred for the last 8-10 tests I then did. I'll keep an eye on that. Very, very dissapointing from Prusa. The ticket on it started 6/7/2023 and its still not resolved. Just had anotehr look at a test print and it is very, very good with Input Shaping. .