Jump to content
Why become a member? ร—

Beedster

โญSupporting Memberโญ
  • Posts

    14,570
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Everything posted by Beedster

  1. Might also be an idea to let us know what bass you have/what neck you need ๐Ÿ‘
  2. This is probably quite helpful ๐Ÿ‘
  3. The reasons why people might buy stuff are many, complex, and odd. Many sellers rely on the fact that there is a person out there who will buy the most worthless of tat, the sellerโ€™s just gotta have a lot of tat and a lot of patience ๐Ÿ‘
  4. Many thanks @Muppet, I'll have to investigate further ๐Ÿ‘
  5. Re the decision process, I think weโ€™ve all learned from this that itโ€™s not the album, itโ€™s how you play it ๐Ÿ‘
  6. Thanks Dave, it's a funny thing, I initially chose Blonde On Blonde because because we had to start somewhere, we wanted to do something that was classic but a little off the beaten track. Despite early reservations, including my own, we came to love it. It's a funny thing, when you have to play the whole album, in recorded order, the potential for disagreement is significantly reduced. And we were a bit worried, the final song is Sad Eyed Lady of the Lowlands is very slow and in textbook terms is the worst song you could ever finish a set with (no encores if you're playing the album and only the album) but the vibe in the room was awesome as one by one, bass, then drums, them Hammond, dropped out leaving that beautiful guitar part soloed and then..... silence. Couldn't have ended better. Next album is, to say the least, a contrast Re video, we chose not to record, the whole thing for us is that it's a moment, we'll never do it again, so we don't want or need to analyse. We've done it, we move on. Lovely to see that around 50% of the room were recording so if we get anything nice - and in which the bass part is even vaguely competent - I'll post here. Thanks for your comments mate ๐Ÿ‘
  7. In truth my fave gig for many years, not the most competent or accomplished but extremely satisfying. First outing for BandKamp, a bunch of friends getting together to rehearse an iconic album for 2-3 months, and then gig it live once and once only before moving on to the next iconic album. First was yesterday when we did Dylan's Blonde on Blonde (tying it in with the Chalomet movie) at The Ballroom in Canterbury, which is a lovely venue. We were expecting an audience of about 10 but to our amazement had around 120. We played the set our way and had a ball doing so, and had people dancing; to Dylan! A few folks said the same thing afterwards; I don't really like Dylan but really like your set. Job done ๐Ÿ‘ Hard to let the album go as over 3-months we've come to love it, but as we've all agreed, we're not in a relationship with it, we've simply had a brief flirtation. Time to move on
  8. The possible it can do Jack ๐Ÿ‘
  9. Poorly done defret, poorly maintained neck overall, and not even a nut installed. Very little real vintage value, ยฃ500 would be optimistic. If it stays there long enough some f***ing idiot will have a beer or teo and buy it however ๐Ÿค”
  10. That's some seriously low action you've got going there ๐Ÿ‘
  11. ....but apart form that I'd say go for it ๐Ÿ˜†
  12. To add my extra (small) thoughts to what I think are several pretty conclusive opinions above, here's some more reasons why you shouldn't defret 1. Fretted necks are forgiving on the wood. Wood moves over time and wood wears over time. Poor alignment or uneven surface of a board is generally masked by frets but brutally exposed on a fretless. After the defret you may find that you have to have the board smoothed, which is expensive anyway but more so with a maple neck as you will also have to have it refinished 2. Maple fretless necks are lush - I have three - but they wear very quickly and need to be looked after, for example they do not like heavy handed players. They have low resale value/desirability by comparison with rosewood/ebanol/ebony in part for that reason, which is probably why I've been able to pick up three quite cheaply 3. You may have to have your neck refinished anyway depending on how much damage is done to the existing finish during the defret. That is expensive 4. You will almost certainly need to cut a new nut for your neck once its fretless (I have never found an odd the shelf nut that I was able to install unmodified on a fretless neck). This is not a big job of course but the costs are all adding up 5. If as you say you're keeping the bass for sentimental reasons, turning into an instrument that might be crap or that you might not like very much or might not be able to play - after all you say you fancy giving fretless a go - seems a bit counterintuitive ๐Ÿ‘
  13. Mate, apart from the fact that weโ€™d all miss you and your contributions, you do realise that BC is like Hotel California; you can check out any time you want but you can never leave ๐Ÿ‘
  14. Yep, the problem with web discussions is that it's all two easy for people who - were they in a bar or at a gig with a beer in their hand would get on famously and have a good chinwag - to get quite worked up about stuff (I've been there too many times). Here's a round for y'all ๐Ÿ‘
  15. My 18th birthday What a stunning bass ๐Ÿ‘
  16. It was really good to see you back, shame it's going to be an 'albeit briefly'
  17. So, I just installed a set of Thumpers I've had hanging around for a few years and they're, well, very very thumpy. Now that seems fair enough given their title, but I'm a little surprised by an almost complete absence of top end to the point that the tone control makes a difference but it's pretty subtle. Is that normal for these - which I can't believe is the case but I'm prepared to be put right - or do I have a gremlin in the works?
  18. Very well put mate ๐Ÿ‘ Personally when I see equipment demo'd in the usual fashion, slap or technical funk in one or other form - I find it a turn off, and over and above it all too ofetn being an ego trip for the person doing the demo (understanadle biut not necessary), it's not letting me know how the gear is going to sound when I play the rock/blues/soul stuff I tend to play.
  19. Agree, but the debate does show what a bloody minefield vintage Fenders are, hope no-one's fallen out over it ๐Ÿ‘
  20. I think itโ€™s part of the appeal
  21. Such an entertaining video (as are their others). I've had a couple of disagreements with Alex over the years, largely - well entirely - my fault, but we should all be bloody grateful that Alex and BF are out there doing what they're doing, and that they're doing with such class and without compromise. I've often wondered why they didn't get into combos given how highly rated their cabs are, but I'm guessing they've identified the direction of travel with this unit. Well done guys ๐Ÿ‘
  22. In my experience when equipment does fail it's rarely in the comfort of a home practice
  23. This was my other semi-Enfield (Fender neck)
  24. Very few people play Rics, even fewer play FL Rics, this is a niche instrument by all standards. But yes, I'm surprised it's still here also. BTW I read somewhere that you should never have an odd number of FLs
  25. It was a very useful experience owning it, being able to - to all intents - swap between basses mid song at the flip of a switch gave me a real appreciation for how the different tones sit and reinforced my thinking around the tone I love, essentially Precision. The fact that on the Fusion (the bass in the post above), the neck pocket is Fender fit was very useful as I was also able to try a lot of different necks, which further cemented my preference for all things Precision (the wider the nut the better). The basses themselves have Simms Custom Shop written all over them, that is, pure class at every level - design, engineering, finish, functionality, and tone.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...