SumOne

RIP Trugoy

I think at least on Basschat almost every mention of Zoom pedals is positive, at least for value for money. Perhaps I'm missing something but I haven't seen people sneering about the plastic. Then again, plastic isn't seen as premium as metal. I'd rather drop a MXR pedal than a Zoom pedal, the Zoom will probably be fine but the plastic feels more likely to crack. That's fine though, it helps keep the price down and one of the best things about them is their value for money.

Perhaps double check the usb cable type, that's caught me out on a couple of devices not connecting. Not all usb cables are data cables.

I found if needing low C then a 5 string with standard tuning was best as it is designed for that tuning (scale length, pickups etc), goes a bit lower to B (or lower), playing shapes stay the same, and you still have the G. My doom pedals in chain order were: For big sustain the Pigtronix Philosopher Bass compressor worked well. Octaver like the OC-5 with +1 and -1 is good to feed into fuzz. MXR Brown Acid has been my favourite doomy fuzz. EHX Green Russian muff is good too, a bit more synthy sounding. Rats always sound a bit more thrash than doom to me, the Blowerbox Landphil is great though. Adding modulation like flanger, Phaser, Chorus can make some interesting effects. What sounds good through headphones doesn't necessarily sound good through a Cab. Personally, I liked my 2x12 speaker with adjust tweeter - to do the lows and the higher frequency fizzy fuzz.

^^^ Nice one. I might get one of those cases. I've sold off all my pedals so am going to try and just use the GX on its own ....although a C4 in the fx loop would be a good addition for synths and extra filters and I expect it could be controlled by the GX-100 via the forthcoming Source Audio midi adaptor (although those types of things often end up being much more hassle than they should be!). I like that the power has a figure 8 cable - cheap and easy to get in different lengths. Ideally for me, the power block part would've been built into the unit but I guess some people wouldn't like that if they wanted to power it from a power brick - can't please everyone!

Another seamless transaction with Chris, thanks!

I've just got a Boss GX 100 and am impressed. It is comparable to the Stomp XL for sounds and features, seems a bit like Apple vs Microsoft in that the Line 6 things are a bit more 'Apple' and immediately intuitive with slicker software interface while the GX seems to allow deeper editing but isn't always as intuitive so can't wing it quite as much - so tips from other users would be helpful. The first tips I have are: - When first plugging in, don't be disheartened if the tuner doesn't recognise your B string: Go to 'in/out settings' and select Bass (guitar is default) and adjust to the correct input sensitivity. Then, when using the tuner, turn the 'select' dial to chose your preferred view and then set for tuning type (e.g. 5 string B regular). The tuner then works very well. - There are no blank presets. Create a template on the 'user' presets by deleting effects and saving (write), that can then be used to overwrite other presets (write/insert). 'Initialize' will delete your preset and revert to original. My questions (so far!) - Line 6 footswitch lights can be lit up dull when switched off to help indicate what it'll be when switched on (e.g. Blue for chorus). Is there a way of doing similar with the Boss footswitch lights? I expect not, there is 'control view' where the screen shows what the footswitches will activate but those thin coloured outlines of small text boxes when 6 foot away aren't obvious to my poor eyesight so any way of making it more obvious would be good.

A Paul Simon quote: “Simply wanting to make the best music can make you competitive,” he said. “You have no idea how competitive John Lennon was around Paul McCartney. When I first met them, I felt like someone had taken all the oxygen out of the room. I almost couldn’t breathe, they were so competitive, and that’s what made them so great. They wouldn’t settle for just good. That was me, too.”

I reckon the GT 100 was a good call. Probably about once a year I decide to sell my individual pedals and get a multi-fx, which I'll then usually sell within 6 months to get individual pedals then the cycle continues! This year is no different, I've just bought a GT 100. For me, it seems to be the right amount of footswitches and onboard controls and easy editing access along with a decent amount of processing power and quality effects. £488 isn't exactly cheap but it isn't overly expensive compared to some multi-fx or the cost of a pedalboard full of individual pedals. I'm expecting a couple of downsides, but it seems they can be overcome easily enough: No synths, but I expect that using 15x effect blocks including Octaver, Fuzz, Modulation & delays it'll be able to produce some good synthy sounds. And there is an FX loop if needed. More outputs including XLR would be good but not essential, my amp has an XLR out (and after all, the cables from Bass to pedals, through a load of pedals and patch cables and then to Amps aren't balanced and it doesn't seem an issue). If I'm lucky enough to play big venues with long cable runs to mixing desks and I'm not using the amp XLR for some reason then small DI boxes are cheap. Drum loops/metronome and an aux in would be nice but streaming can be done with a Bluetooth connector as an optional extra. Or I guess the fx loop return can possibly be used. Edit: I got a good deal on a GX 1000 Core so returned the GT 100 to fund it (thanks to GAK with a quick and easy returns policy with no fuss). The Core is more powerful (more effect blocks, more parallel paths, an extra fx loop, higher sample rate) and smaller and has a couple of extra effects, the GT has a better user interface on the screen and more footswitches + expression pedal. I've added an expression pedal to the Core (but it misses the GT expression 'hard toe press' button which is useful to do things like change it from a volume control to wah while in the same preset) and I'll get a dual footswitch, it still won't have as much footswitch control as the GX though. The Core is better if you want it as part of a pedalboard, the GT as stand-alone.

Can the expression pedal can be mapped to alter 2x different effects and parameters at the same time? What I'm after is the expression pedal to simultaneously increase reverb while cutting bass/increasing high mids and then to switch to be able to use the expression pedal to simultaneously adjust delay feedback and time. That is quite complicated and expensive with individual pedals so multi fx seems best. The nearest priced multi fx I've had that can do it is the Pod Go by using different presets but I found its effect block quite limiting and I didn't love the sound of some effects so am keen to give Boss a go.

Liberation Group, Namibia:

That is cheeky of them if that's actually their policy, especially because if you give your bass for them to sell on commission they wait for 2 weeks after the sale to pay you, apparently this was incase it got returned for a refund.

That's a great review, thanks.

Yes, hopefully it wouldn't matter. I had the Q-strip pedal which had a 45Hz HPF and it was usually difficult to hear if it was on or not unless doing very low sub/synth type stuff and listening on headphones or studio monitors.

The 9 series 15" woofer range has big price difference: 945 (650Hz crossover) 135dB £1,229 935 (800Hz crossover) 133dB £930 915 (1800Hz crossover) 131dB £655 As far as I understand, they basically have the same housing, same amp, same 15" woofers, the same frequency response. So the almost £600 extra between the 915 and the 945 is down to the 1.75" horn vs the 4" horn, and that is important for higher range stuff like vocals and as it also affects the bass output because it means the crossover is a higher frequency so the woofer can concentrate more on the bass. So I'll rule out the 915 with that quite high crossover point, and I'll need to rule out the 945 on cost, which leaves the 935. ......But considering that the 932 with 12" Woofer & 3" horn is cheaper, has a lower crossover frequency, is smaller, 5.4kg lighter (18.8kg vs 24.2kg for the 935), the same 133dB, I'm thinking that's probably the one for me*. 932 (700Hz crossover) 133dB, £825 My question is: Is the 15" woofer significantly better for use as a bass cab than the 12"? It goes down to 45Hz vs 50Hz, that is the only advantage I can see on paper (and I do play dub/reggae on a 5 string so perhaps those low Hz are important), other than that is it going to be worth the extra size, weight, and cost? *(not that I'm in the market to buy right now, I'm actually trying to sell bulky bass gear ahead of a house move...doesn't stop me internet window shopping to plan for the day I can buy stuff back again though!)