Musicman20

These things are sent to try us! The big al in particular sounds better than I remember but after inspecting both I think I'm in for a replacement wait

[quote name='niceguyhomer' post='1159928' date='Mar 12 2011, 10:15 PM']Tried a Jazz 5 and really liked it but couldn't buy one at the show. There was a guy on the OW stand who just came over while I was playing it through the TC combo - he muttered something and then turned the amp off..so I thought oh well keep your bass then. £600 sale lost.[/quote] Not good

See, now thats how pole pieces should line up to strings! That is a stunner.

Its probably the most annoying way to 'test' a bass. There is more to the bass than slap sound! I dont mind it, but its more important to hear the different finger/pick tones!

Ive gigged both, and the RH450 totally hammers volume wise. I can understand people liking the Pro-3, but for me, the RH450 really does sit it another higher league.

Is there no end to things going wrong?! I've had a rubbish 3 months and now my Sterling 5 and Big Al 5 have turned up with what looks like partly shipping damage (one case is seriously cracked) and other very annoying things. The both sound great but my gut tells me I'm in for yet another wait...

I think the 250W rating might have something to do with it, and pushing it at higher volumes. Sorry to hear this, I hope it gets sorted!

Thanks, im letting it rest. I think at most its had half a turn. The EBMM setup guide says dont slacken the strings, but most other guides say DO slacken the strings! Very odd! I will try that re: slackening the string a little tonight and let it rest at room temp, and Ill also then lower the saddles a little. Im quite happy with intonating and saddle height, but Truss Rods are always a big 'arghhh' to me!

I just want to make sure im not doing anything wrong. The changes I made havent really done that much as far as I can see, BUT, the relief when using the test with a business card shows it has gone down a little, but still not 'business card' low. More of a thick plastic credit card.

My Ray 5 HS has been in very cold weather due to the temperatures in Newcastle. I have kept it mainly in its case due to moving so thats a good thing. All is fine with the bass, but as happened with my Jazz, the strings appear to be a little high off the board. I have a bass tool kit now, so I looked at the EBMM site and hunted for advice. Firstly, I turned the TR Wheel towards the G, eg that should flatten the neck out and let me have a lower action. I did very small turns, one at a time, then adjusted tuning and left it for 20 mins or so. I did this 3 times, and I was very cautious, so im guessing at most its had half a turn, with gaps in between. I THINK this has sorted it a little, as doing the EBMM test of holding the second fret, then the twelth, and checking the string height, it seems it is about the height of a credit card....eg another tiny turn might help?! The strings do seem to have less pressure and tension, which is what I was seeking....Id just like the strings lower and the action faster. I have left it overnight, but as EBMM have said, their necks react quite fast so often the changes will occur within minutes. Ill check it tomorrow, but what can I do next? I dont want to lower the saddles too much as I dont want loads of fret buzz...they are at factory height still. Am I safe to turn the wheel more? PS - The TR Wheel is truely a fantastic invention. It makes TR adjustments SO easy...and less stressful.

Keep it!

I think just a tiny bit more headroom. The pull mute is too fiddly...but I'm glad they at least put it on!

[quote name='JTUK' post='1156103' date='Mar 10 2011, 12:15 AM']And bin the yellow bumble bee look..!![/quote] Lol! At least it's become a little more subtle over the years...seems to be more black on the LM3 etc now I think. But yeah, weird colour scheme! I think MB make extremely good amps, but the amps that are over 500W seem to sound nothing like the popular models they make eg LM3 or F500. I will look back into their products when they have a new line of amps out, but Id really like then to beef the basic features up a little and go ahead with that improved limiter that never saw light. 700W F500 in a slightly larger box, better laid out EQ with semi para mids, a proper mute (what is their problem with mutes?!) and the features I mentioned above would be great. Even a few pounds heavier would be fine. They dont seem to have nailed a tube amp 'crunch' as yet like TC and now Genz, but I bet they are developing something.

[quote name='MythSte' post='1155999' date='Mar 9 2011, 10:33 PM']What makes you say that? I think the MoMark was a bit of an iffy call but I'd say the rest all have some advantages.[/quote] I think their catalogue of products is great and varied, but what I'd want next is the F500 but more power, better control layout if possible, maybe a little larger, and a proper mute! Oh, and headphone in/aux!

I notice the mids are nice and barky if necessary on the Jazz bass in the vid WoT. Still smooth though

They need to concentrate on F500 and LM3 type amps, and ditch the rest!

Im shocked the thread is still going! Ive barely used mine but its a nice bass to have around for rough gigs.

I would check out the Big Al. More money, but very nice pre-amp/passive option, and tons of flexibility. Plus, it has its own voice.

I really think its a little unfair to brand someone as 'paranoid' because they dont want their personal possessions and any other details on a website. I think that is just being cautious. I like the trust on this site, but it would not be hard for someone to become part of Basschat and cause havoc. I stopped listing my gear because it changes so much (although Im happy to stop now), because the signature was too large, and because there was a lot of information about expensive instruments. I dont think Ive deleted for sale posts, but if someone wants to that is their choice. I can see the advantage of a back catalogue of prices, but CONDITION makes a massive difference.

Im sorted! [url="http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f126/fs-only-vintage-1981-stingray-2010-rare-pink-classic-stingray-695627/"]http://www.talkbass.com/forum/f126/fs-only...tingray-695627/[/url] The 1981 Ray. Good job, because the 80s Fenders never really appealed to me.

Anything decent from 81?!

[quote name='Prime_BASS' post='1155075' date='Mar 9 2011, 11:16 AM']I'm sure I ordered around the same time as you, which is even more confusing. I guess waiting all this time, then being told I may have to wait a further few months is a bit demoralising. I hope you enjoy it once you get it. The only worry I have is living with the thinner neck, since I'm so used to my chunky ray neck.[/quote] Hi dude I ordered mine early October, and according to my PMs, I think we discussed the one you were going to order late November. Id imagine 4-5 months is the minimum wait at the moment, but sometimes like with the more usual models, it can be less than 3 months. All depends on what is on order etc. Ive enjoyed the wait, as it made me realise how much I want it and let me (finally) sort out my finances for everything. Dont worry about the thinner neck. The Sterling neck is between a P bass and a J bass if you ask me. Its VERY fast, but you wont get cramps from how small it is. Itll be worth it

Agreed on the Sadowsky Metro basses....I just could not see how they were worth £1600+!

I get the distinct impression they are VERY busy over there. Mine were 5 months ish...which is longer than normal, but a good sign that they are selling well.

Sorry man it doesn't look like a Ric to me, but I wouldn't expect that for £250. Let us all know the outcome.