NancyJohnson

[quote name='SpcMnk' timestamp='1481978780' post='3196715'] With a bigger scale the distance between the frets increases so you would need really big hands to become friends with that one.. [/quote] Arm length would be more of a factor I suspect, however as I said earlier, I could feasibly rob two or three inches by moving the bridge further back on my JAXT4m so the additional length would only be c.3" beyond the nut. There's a scale length calculator over on the Stewmac site to support measurements. [url="https://www.stewmac.com/FretCalculator.html"]https://www.stewmac.com/FretCalculator.html[/url] Just type in the scale length and number of frets. Interestingly (and if you have a Fender Precision close to hand), the nut (open tuning) would be at a position equivalent to dead centre that of the D-string machine head capstan. The fifth fret on the 40" scale (so an E) would be roughly at the equivalent position of the 2nd fret (F#) on the Precision.

I did a search and all there were were a few hokey live photos of him playing a Jazz Bass shaped bass with a MM pickup on it. It could have been silver or pink. That's how good those pics were.

I think for me the issue is purely down to the visual aesthetics. Longer scale, bigger body. I've got a JAXT4 which has a Thunderbird shaped body, albeit 20% bigger...you could easily(!) steal two or three inches at the bridge end, just by setting the bridge further back, which would only mean adding four to six inches to neck length. It's an interesting concept...sadly it would probably cost an arm and a leg.

Paul Schuster at Lull posted up the image below on the Lull Facebook page yesterday. The bass on the right is a one off build for a customer; a 40" scale monster tuned BEAD. Aside from this (and a little plea for more information), I have nothing more for you. (If you're interested, left to right the models are a 30" scale, a 34", a 34" with an oversized JAX layout and finally the 40" brute.) I mean, credit for Lull for actually building this. I just get a little tired of standard basses being 34" or 35", just because, cough, 'Leo got it right.'

I've uploaded a track we recorded on 11th December 2016 called Stay Out Late. Band is Who Killed Nancy Johnson? Vocals: Stefan James Guitar: Peter Moulton Bass: Paul Anthony (yours truly!) Drums: Marky Wren. We all did backing vocals. Music: Paul Anthony (me!) Lyrics: Stefan James https://www.dropbox.com/s/x6t04blibq9sju5/4%20Stay%20Out%20Late.mp3?dl=0 (Hopefully this'll work. If not, PM me.)

I use Sennheiser HD202. I didn't pay much for them and just checked Amazon and they're £20.00!! I think that's actually less than what I paid about five years ago. They've been brilliant really.

Isn't the 'most' thing just a disclaimer? The transmitter side of the product utilises a (standard) 1/4" input and in 'most' cases your instrument will have a (standard) 1/4" output jack socket, so a short patch cable will suffice. All they're alluding to is that some instruments might have a different output types, requiring a different cable or adapter.

[quote name='wateroftyne' timestamp='1480504627' post='3184852'] It's disappointing that the BBC are using a racial angle in their headlines. [/quote] I thought this as well.

Evening all No affiliation here. There's a Hamer Blitz bass up on eBay for the bargain price of £450 (I found it while searching for a Cruisebass), however, the seller is also selling it for £395 on their storefront website. Looks very clean for a guitar 30+ years old. The serial number shows it to be a 1983 model. Link/photo below. Good hunting Paul [url="http://shop.musical-money.co.uk/guitars/6081-1983-hamer-blitz-bass-guitar-metallic-red.html"]http://shop.musical-money.co.uk/guitars/6081-1983-hamer-blitz-bass-guitar-metallic-red.html[/url]

I hadn't given the gloss element much thought...all my stuff is either solid colour or varnished/poly and it takes a few minutes for them to gets a bit sweaty to speed things up.

I did a little guffaw at 3.5mm. Yikes. Granted I like my action low and a bit rattly, but a decent twelfth fret action here is 2mm or less.

I played the Fighting Cocks in Kingston last night. Lots of fun, although apparently the sound guy walked out for five minutes because he was offended at the content of one of our songs. Sheesh. I mean, we've all gone out on a blind date with a girl called Zoe, only to find out it's a guy, haven't we?

[quote name='TimR' timestamp='1480097347' post='3181696'] I wouldn't start opening them up. Alex is pretty particular on the construction, especially the cross bracing to keep them rigid while using lightweight plywood. I followed a thread on another site a few years ago when he was making the prototype. It's very clever. [/quote] Have you got a link...I believe that prototype is about three meters from where I'm typing this...

Dependent on budget, but my wife got me a Line6 G30 wireless a couple of years ago. It only comes out for gigs, but I love being cable free.

My Lull has got a reverse headstock. It's a bugger to tune now and again and at one stage I was considering seeing whether they'd do me a neck with the headstock the other way around.

Matrix Amplification GT1000FX. I have a this racked (a shallow Gator 4U) and run a Sansamp RBI into it. Very happy. As it's dual channel, I'm able to pair it with a pair of cabinets and feed it two independent inputs. It's loud, light, looks good and reliable. What's not to like?

[quote name='blue' timestamp='1479213214' post='3174749'] Being in a band is fun. Starting a band is not, it's hard work which most are I'll equipped to do. Blue [/quote] Sorry Blue, starting a new project is a blast and not really that hard at all. Unless you have a ready pool of musicians, you advertise, make a few calls, set a date, book a room and play. The hardest part is trying to get shot of someone who doesn't work out.

I can't actually understand why Fender don't/didn't clearcoat over the headstock after the transfer has been applied.