steve-bbb

[quote name='SlackAlice' post='1321300' date='Jul 30 2011, 01:52 PM']Currently having a few beers in Soho & will pop down to Denmark St. later.......will have a browse & see how there 'customer service' fairs......:; Angie[/quote] Angie are you going to go for the quiet and subtle and 'knowledgable' approach? or maybe instead try the over-keen inexperienced amateur approach with something like 'im thinking doing my hair purple and spiky for my new band and wondered if you had a bass that would go nicely with it .... AND keep a straight face oh and let us know the response

[quote name='BottomEndian' post='1319797' date='Jul 28 2011, 09:51 PM'][/quote] are they black leather strings?

this is making me feel extremley old - owing to the fact that i saw them at Hull Uni in 1980 and jolly good they were too [url="http://youtu.be/EOQOa37iGLE"]SECTOR 27 - (Jo Burt on fretless)[/url]

dirtyloops is good but just a couple of odd occasions where it seems like theyre throwing in just that little bit too much syncopation and trying to be too clever - and nobody likes a smarty pants do they but on the whole very slick and good technical playing all round - jolly well done 8/10 but anybody who can play bass like that with a straight face in their underpants takes the prize im afraid cardiacs win - no contest!

i like both types of music ... country AND western

[quote name='silddx' post='1317579' date='Jul 26 2011, 08:14 PM']Ahh, I never said they were [/quote] i know you didnt i did!

[quote name='silddx' post='1316622' date='Jul 26 2011, 09:06 AM']Serious question.[/quote] for some there issues wonderful music with complete indfference to technique for some technique never ends and music never really begins the two are rarely interdependent - there has been some great music by bands with very questionable musical technique and conversely there has been some highly technically proficient widdlers producing ..... well.... just plain widdle

i have mine at 'simon cowell' height and it really irritates me all you naughty people out there who think it's big and clever to have it swinging somewhere around your knees ! GRRR

[quote name='Kevin Glasgow' post='1310296' date='Jul 20 2011, 01:55 PM']Thanks a lot for the kind comments guys![/quote] love the tone on the group piece too </biased trb owner>

[quote name='WHUFC BASS' post='610750' date='Sep 28 2009, 12:34 PM']You'll all hate it I promise... [/quote] "dont you boys know any nice songs?" [font="Franklin Gothic Medium"][i]FZ[/i][/font]

[quote name='chewrocket' post='1307716' date='Jul 18 2011, 12:41 PM']and its very ugly![/quote] i think youll find the correct technical term is [size=7][font="Arial Black"]FUGLY[/font][/size]

presuming it did have a provenance of being previously owned by a famous celeb basser to warrant such a price tag surely you would sell it through the american equivalent of bonhams specialist music auction or the like?

[quote name='Doddy' post='1306952' date='Jul 17 2011, 07:13 PM']Arthur Barrow did some cool pick stuff too. Although...I'd plump for Scott Thunes.[/quote] scott thunes was/is good but i prefer [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Gr6Re7LKY0"]patrick[/url] [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQTezHnMtQQ&"]o'hearn[/url]

[quote name='Norm' post='1306572' date='Jul 17 2011, 12:22 PM']Q for the forum? Who was the awesome pick player who played with Zappa for a while? Simply stunning technique! Churrs, Norm.[/quote] scott thunes or tom fowler? [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dd_gU03mcZ4&"]tom fowler[/url] [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kx8tRwErVvg&"]scott thunes[/url]

[font="Arial Black"]I'm JOHN and so is my wife [/font]

[quote name='Dandelion' post='1305916' date='Jul 16 2011, 03:59 PM']And whilst were on the subject how do you change the little comment that sits underneath it? [/quote] [font="Arial Black"][b]edit your signature [/b][/font]on your profile editing page dohhh sorry another senior moment there - im guessing that the member status thingy is defined by the sit eby length of time of membership and number of posts etc

[quote]So, we'll be seeing a photo soon of you looking like George Clooney?[/quote] here you go

after all i couldnt possibly show my face to the world for the shame of owning a bass with stone cladding!

Hi Len sorry i no pic of me - it might frighten the bass newbies into running away and starting up something a bit more gentle like a nice woodwind instrument or a glockenspiel or something thanks for the explanation - thats what i thought it was - ive had a pic in there since day one but it never shows up in the posts here is a screenshot

i had a 4+6 standard double , no modulators or fancy stuff - both necks felt quite good and id bother to get a good setup doen would have been very nice indeed - downside apart form the obvious weight issues and sheer size of the flight case was mainly the sound - really rather thin and unintersting on both but probably would have been more acceptable with a good setup and replacement tone circuitry would def buy another shergold six string or bass if the opportunity arose be prepared to spend a bit of time and effort to get the best out of it!

thakfully im no longer a newbie ... just as well the stigma of it all was starting to get to me ...anyway as im old and forgetful and not very good with all this new interweb technology can anybody tell me how i get a nice little pic to come up in the margin in the left alongside my rambling posting thank you muchly

[quote name='neepheid' post='1305698' date='Jul 16 2011, 12:49 PM']Tell your missus. Plan it out together.[/quote] does she play bass too?

find a shop that will do a 'wife receipt' there used to be a hi-fi shop in chatham that would do you a genuine receipt at the retail price and also a 'wife receipt' at a fraction of the retail price the latter for you to show 'she who must be obeyed' and trot out the predictable line of ..... but darling it only cost £xxx.00 look ive got the receipt here

[quote name='BottomEndian' post='1304624' date='Jul 15 2011, 12:14 PM']Vader favours headless: [/quote] looks more like KISS without the make up