MartinB Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Covers on a Precision look cool, and I never found that they got in the way - I just don't currently have a suitable bass to put them on. I can imagine the Jazz ones could be annoying due to the much larger footprint of the bridge cover though. 1 Quote
chris_b Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago I took the covers off my Precision because I played right over the pickup, I didn't like the sound of the foam, it was a hassle to change the strings, and most importantly because John McVie took his off. I was easily influenced in those days!! 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, HeadlessBassist said: They're basically metallic talent inhibitors. We can't get to the sweet spot or move around the pickups for different sounds with them on. Marcus Miller uses the neck pickup cover as a wrist rest, but I'm sure it still gets in the way. I'm sure it was a great idea in the 1950s/60s to add them and have mute pads attached inside the bridge cover, but techniques have moved on in the ensuing 75 years - unless you're looking for the Laura Lee style consistency... I'm sorry, I fell asleep there for a moment. Bridge mutes can sound awesome for the right song. Quote
HeadlessBassist Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said: Bridge mutes can sound awesome for the right song. Palm muting can sound even better and more expressive. Quote
TimR Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, Wombat said: And literally no one has said why we take them off! Are we just sheep? I saw someone recently rest their palm on the pup cover while they slapped. Seemed a neat way to avoid damping the strings accidentally? 2 hours ago, HeadlessBassist said: They're basically metallic talent inhibitors. We can't get to the sweet spot or move around the pickups for different sounds with them on. Marcus Miller uses the neck pickup cover as a wrist rest, but I'm sure it still gets in the way. I'm sure it was a great idea in the 1950s/60s to add them and have mute pads attached inside the bridge cover, but techniques have moved on in the ensuing 75 years - unless you're looking for the Laura Lee style consistency... I'm sorry, I fell asleep there for a moment. Aren't they foam backed and so damp the strings automatically. Hence - take them off if you don't like the sound. Quote
Wombat Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago The foam has long since rotted and I can’t remember what it sounded like before. This bass has been in my brothers wardrobe for the last 20 odd years 😂. And Headlessbassist made me realise that it WAS Marcus Miller that I saw resting on the pup cover! Saw him at Koko in London last month! 😂 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, HeadlessBassist said: Palm muting can sound even better and more expressive. No, it isn't the same. Fixed mutes don't kill the harmonics in the same way. You can aldo combine finger/palm muting with fixed mutes and get a really wide range of sounds. 2 Quote
HeadlessBassist Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Stub Mandrel said: No, it isn't the same. Fixed mutes don't kill the harmonics in the same way. You can aldo combine finger/palm muting with fixed mutes and get a really wide range of sounds. I'll have to try that with my '95 Stingray's mutes. 1 Quote
Reggaebass Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I don’t use the covers on my P and jazz basses, but my AVRI 62P came with the bridge cover fitted so I left it on, all my the screws go in a small sealable bag and stored in the hard cases, same with the thumb/finger rests and screws 1 Quote
tauzero Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 10 hours ago, Geek99 said: Things from a bygone era Jack Hargreaves probably mentions them in “out of town” at some point Is this one of these basses being played? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.