-
Posts
8,782 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
94
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by Stub Mandrel
-
The basic problem is a 'bolt' was originally a cylindrical object that secures something by fitting into a hole. Fixings with a thread on the end and a head at the other with a shank that fits a hole become known as bolts. A screw thread, is, well, a thread. By extension, the term 'screw' applies to any threaded fixing. So all screws are screws. Most screws can serve as bolts but usage is a poor definition as something can be classified differently depending on how it's used. Only self-cutting screws are definitely not bolts, and even then it is possible to get 'wood bolts' with a self-cutting thread and a plain shank for fixing metal to wood. One thing that is interesting is that it is fairly easy to make machine screws and bolts. Making self tapping or taper screw threads is much more tricky.
-
Yes? And...
-
Has no effect on me...
-
What are you listening to right now?
Stub Mandrel replied to Sarah5string's topic in General Discussion
Greta to see real music being appreciated with an explanation of why it's real. -
But there are so many ways to split it... this one deprecates my definition. https://www.accu.co.uk/en/p/131-difference-between-screws-and-bolts
-
I have some no more than 20 feet away... but you can just go to boltworld... https://boltworld.co.uk/collections/m8-bolts Most of these are screws. The 'roofing bolts' are like coach bolts, they have a square shank to fit a matching hole. The cap screws have a section of plain shank, which allows them to be used as bolts, but they are not primarily used as such.
-
The definition is vague and contested. I stand by mine as the most usual British usage 🙂 I use a fixing with an unthreaded section of shank to locate and fix an unthreaded part to a threaded one. It's both a bolt and a screw by your definition, a bolt by mine. 😈
-
I know, I said as much. Acorns are nuts. Conkers and almonds aren't. Whether something is a nut is not a good guide to what's in a bag of mixed nuts. Same with screws. What most people call bolts are screws; bolts have a plain shank, usually fitted to a hole.
-
A peanut is a nut. I said I'd seen 'may contain peanuts' on a bag of peanuts. But I didn't say peanut allergy is the same as a tree nut allergy. A walnut isn't a nut, by the way. It is the seed of a large fleshy green fruit - if you haven't ever seen one, rather like a conker (which isn't a nut either).
-
Playing songs in a covers band you dont always like.?
Stub Mandrel replied to bubinga5's topic in General Discussion
Who the flip is Alice? -
Yes, yes. It's that old straw man again, I'm not saying they are the same, you decided I was. That said the confusion among the laity is useful in terms of public safety as many people who have one allergy have the other, and they are processed in similar ways and often the same places. Those who actually have an allergy usually have the capacity to make the discrimination themselves, it's best that non-experts err on the side of caution (which was my original point about all this labelling taking non-technical broad brush approaches which are most straightforward to implement at the expense of generating amusement rather than ambiguity).
-
Not my point. I don't want to confuse people with allergies, but most of the allergies to 'nuts' are tree-nut allergies. Yes peanuts are completely different (actually the Fabaceaae these days, Leguminosae has gone the way of Paipillionaceae). Even this isn't very helpful, for example many close relatives of the panut are trees, and peanuts are more closely related to oak trees they oak trees are to ash trees. Vast numbers of plants have nuts, including peanuts, but unless you are a botanist (like me) you wouldn't consider them nuts. Similarly, Almonds and Walnuts aren't nuts, to a botanist they are seeds - they come from inside a fleshy outer fruit. It's just like a tomato is really a fruit, a pineapple is a vegetable and a strawberry is neither.
-
I just got a lovely backplate from TLC in the Netherlands for my 'Deathburger' that allows me to have my own logo on it in a subtle way. What finishing touches do you use to make your builds your own?
-
The best thing you can do is learn, and practice, whole songs. Don't be afraid to go well outside your usual musical tastes, variety builds your skills. The song I've just learned (see above) has given me some new ideas .
-
I must have been imagining it 🙄, although the less tentative 'contains peanuts' is more common. Strictly a nut is any fruit capsule that doesn't split open to release the contained seeds, so a peanut is a nut and a conker isn't.
-
If you want really portable for hotels etc, consider:
-
The premise behind the California legislation is that if a substance is particularly harmful, then its presence should be highlighted to the purchaser. How do you do this and have manageable exceptions. Some electrical goods have accessible solder a child could chew, others don't. Do you have complex, expensive rules and tests like those for insulating live components, or just stick a cheap label on everything? It's like 'may contain peanuts' on a bag of peanuts. Do you have a law that says everything that may contain peanuts must be labelled unless it's obvious it contains peanuts? How do you define which products 'obviously' contain peanuts? Yes it generates mirth when warnings seem tautological or over-exaggerated, but in truth this is simply a pragmatic approach that avoids excess expense and litigation.
-
Caustic soda? Paint stripper? Personally I's rather sand it down. I have a cheap neck heading for me and that's what I will do.
-
I hate the dunlops on one of my basses - so much overhang! Schallers - why not buy cheap clones. If you are unhappy with the locks, just use the strap buttons to replace 'official' schaller ones. They are all interchangeable.
-
Signature basses....turn on or turn off?
Stub Mandrel replied to martthebass's topic in Bass Guitars
It's about £110 cheaper than the 60th Anniversary Roadworn Jazz which is £1,199, which is virtually the same spec except it doesn't have '62 pickups -as far as I can tell. I'm happy with mine over an American Performer Jazz. I tried MIA and MIM jazz basses before choosing. The 'Flea' signature doesn't offend me but was far from a reason to buy. I can't see why the original bass appeals to Flea for his music, but it does demonstrate that the musician matters more than the instrument when it comes to the sound. I agree, signature basses are usually unusual or even unique specs. My brother bought an Epiphone 'Gold Glory' which is a signature (Jared Kushmer or some other guy...) because it was outstanding for the price and pretty unique (a Les Paul with a single P90 and that's his favourite configuration). -
Fender Performer, but with a transparent blue flame maple top, slightly meatier neck and '62 Jazz pickups.
-
-
I love my Orange Crush 25. Totally converted me to Orange, I now have a Bass Terror for gigging.
-
With of Without You @TimR was right...