Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

tegs07

Member
  • Posts

    3,136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by tegs07

  1. Mine was definitely basswood. I did read reports of an odd composite wood though when researching buying it.
  2. Misery is the river of the world - Tom Waits
  3. I’ve owned one. It’s in the Squire CV bracket in terms of quality IMO. Nice bass and £300 would be reasonable. Worth bearing in mind that a new G&L Tribute can be bagged for the same cash.
  4. You’ll never die in this town again - The kill devil hills
  5. Bands that share royalties seem to have far more longevity and remain friends with less acrimonious breakups and expensive court cases. The Cure, U2, The Strangers are a few I can think of. I think it’s important to recognise the individuals input in terms of what they contribute musically as well as off stage. Morrisey for example maybe a gifted lyricist but I can imagine him being an insufferable tw@t in real life. In the early life of a band I can’t imagine him going out of the way to build an audience by being approachable to fans or venue staff and promoters. Before any success comes these things really matter. In the case of The Doors Jim Morrison must have been a nightmare to work with towards the end but the band always seemed to work with him and remain supportive.
  6. I post here and think wood selection has an influence on how a bass sounds. How much of an influence and whether it even matters is another issue. When people mentioned tonewood the first things that I generally think of are grain and weight.
  7. The Grudge - Tool sorry that’s all that came to mind with Morrissey
  8. I’m fairly sure Chuck Garric’s main bass is a 70’s Fender P. There would be nothing wrong with a well set up Epiphone Vintage Pro though. I keep getting an urge to buy one but really have no need for one.
  9. Why? I’m interested in the range of opinions on here. Personally I think every incremental improvement on an instrument from wood choice to a great finish makes a fine instrument and is worth the additional cost even if that extra cost doesn’t really make a difference to how good the instrument plays or sounds after a certain price point. I don’t really mind if brands use marketing or signature models to make fairly pointless variations of the same thing. I don’t mind if a luthier incorporates a bit of wood from a Pirate ship and says it invokes a sense of adventure and a mystical nautical tone. Whatever works for you. However it clearly annoys some people.
  10. Nothing of the sort. I’m trying to work out what opinions there are on here regarding inexpensive vs top end instruments. I’m particularly interested in views from people that that really dislike big brands and get all het up by the claims of top luthiers.
  11. Edit: Is the pendulum now swinging in favour of better materials and attention to detail makes a better bass?
  12. The US ones go to town on the necks too. They are really very good.
×
×
  • Create New...