Quatschmacher Posted Wednesday at 21:31 Author Posted Wednesday at 21:31 16 minutes ago, LawrenceH said: Hmm I had no idea about that! A strange and annoying quirk that seems like it would cause all sorts of problems. Can't remember if it has been open or not tbh. Will have another go, thanks for flagging that! It’s a really annoying Windows limitation - it only allows a single USB-MIDI device to be active at a time. Quote
LawrenceH Posted Wednesday at 21:58 Posted Wednesday at 21:58 Boring midi problems aside, I'm interested to know the current progress on implementing portamento/glide on audio trigger. For me that is still the number one feature limitation (as opposed to quality of life issue) of the FI4. Quote
Quatschmacher Posted Wednesday at 22:04 Author Posted Wednesday at 22:04 6 minutes ago, LawrenceH said: Boring midi problems aside, I'm interested to know the current progress on implementing portamento/glide on audio trigger. For me that is still the number one feature limitation (as opposed to quality of life issue) of the FI4. Already done and working. 1 Quote
MacDaddy Posted Wednesday at 22:14 Posted Wednesday at 22:14 5 hours ago, LukeFRC said: On a pedal that can do a billion different things - What’s “that” sound? The first preset. There are demos of it in the MXR synth pedal thread. Quote
LawrenceH Posted Wednesday at 22:48 Posted Wednesday at 22:48 32 minutes ago, Quatschmacher said: Already done and working. Brilliant! Can't wait to give it a go. Amidst all the focus on preset management, I hope the idea of changing a subset of the default presets (ideally the first bank) to some of your more 'classic' bass sounds hasn't fallen by the wayside for any upcoming release. For obvious reasons I'd think it a particular selling point if one of these was a sound with e.g. square/pulse and saw layered. Quote
LawrenceH Posted Wednesday at 22:54 Posted Wednesday at 22:54 I also have a more general question about tracking and strings/instrument EQ. Are spanking new roundwounds likely to track better than older? How about flats? What about the effect of tone controls on the instrument itself? Or pickup position? Any safe generalisations? It's possible I've asked something similar before, in which case forgive me. Quote
Quatschmacher Posted yesterday at 05:53 Author Posted yesterday at 05:53 7 hours ago, LawrenceH said: Brilliant! Can't wait to give it a go. Amidst all the focus on preset management, I hope the idea of changing a subset of the default presets (ideally the first bank) to some of your more 'classic' bass sounds hasn't fallen by the wayside for any upcoming release. For obvious reasons I'd think it a particular selling point if one of these was a sound with e.g. square/pulse and saw layered. Yep, that suggestion was taken on board. Since parameters can’t be edited from the panel, I’ve also suggested creating some basic presets which use common combinations of waves which would be suited to get the maximum variation from the onboard parameters. 1 Quote
Quatschmacher Posted yesterday at 06:01 Author Posted yesterday at 06:01 6 hours ago, LawrenceH said: I also have a more general question about tracking and strings/instrument EQ. Are spanking new roundwounds likely to track better than older? How about flats? What about the effect of tone controls on the instrument itself? Or pickup position? Any safe generalisations? It's possible I've asked something similar before, in which case forgive me. Strings with a strong fundamental are preferable, so flats and broken-in strings. New roundwounds have a lot of high end which, depending on how you play, could cause strong overtones that might confuse the tracking. As for pickups, I use only P basses now, but have used it with PJ and JJ configurations. Neck pickups give better fundamental but bridge pickups seem good for ever so slightly faster note-on triggering. I used to play dual pickups and favour the neck for the fundamental but dial in a bit of the bridge to help the note-on triggering. Mostly using flatwounds. 1 Quote
LawrenceH Posted yesterday at 10:02 Posted yesterday at 10:02 3 hours ago, Quatschmacher said: Strings with a strong fundamental are preferable, so flats and broken-in strings. New roundwounds have a lot of high end which, depending on how you play, could cause strong overtones that might confuse the tracking. As for pickups, I use only P basses now, but have used it with PJ and JJ configurations. Neck pickups give better fundamental but bridge pickups seem good for ever so slightly faster note-on triggering. I used to play dual pickups and favour the neck for the fundamental but dial in a bit of the bridge to help the note-on triggering. Mostly using flatwounds. Excellent, that suits me as though I use rounds I'm a very reluctant string changer! I was concerned that fast mode might use more of the overtones to make a guess at the note and old strings can be a bit dicey there. Thanks as always for the sage advice and keeping us in the loop. Looking forward to the new update! 1 Quote
Kiwi Posted yesterday at 11:26 Posted yesterday at 11:26 19 hours ago, Quatschmacher said: As for pickups, I use only P basses now, but have used it with PJ and JJ configurations. Neck pickups give better fundamental but bridge pickups seem good for ever so slightly faster note-on triggering. I used to play dual pickups and favour the neck for the fundamental but dial in a bit of the bridge to help the note-on triggering. Mostly using flatwounds. I agree with everything, have also found single pickup basses generally track better and Stingrays too but with the bass dialled back a little. 2 Quote
Quatschmacher Posted yesterday at 11:42 Author Posted yesterday at 11:42 1 hour ago, LawrenceH said: I was concerned that fast mode might use more of the overtones to make a guess at the note No guesswork involved; fast mode simply spits out the previously-detected note until it fully reads the new one. It’s the same underlying detection routine in both modes though. 1 Quote
Quatschmacher Posted 22 hours ago Author Posted 22 hours ago Panda were scheduled to exhibit at Guitar Summit last week but had to cancel at the last minute due to two of the team being ill. Here’s one of the demos they’d prepared: 7 1 Quote
Al Krow Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Sounds good! Is that what the new VIP model looks like with a light shone on it? Quote
Quatschmacher Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Al Krow said: Sounds good! Is that what the new VIP model looks like with a light shone on it? Why? Are you looking for another excuse to not buy it?😂 Quote
LawrenceH Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago I do really like the last voice, sounds sexily expensive - can see that being v useful. Is that off the FI or the Moog? I guess robotic Kraftwerk emulation probably has a bigger market segment in Germany/EU, but I'd still like a demo with a more funk-oriented player, focusing on playability and expression. I know I should be the change I want to see, but the learning curve seems steep in terms of learning the pedal itself alongside video production and YouTube publishing. Quote
Al Krow Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Quatschmacher said: Why? Are you looking for another excuse to not buy it?😂 I'll take that as a "yes" then? 😅 I think I'm maybe excused from needing excuses, having bought (and subsequently moved on) 5 of these FIs over several years (starting way back in 2018)? You know, a bit like getting lifelong immunity from having had a course of vaccines? Risk is that HMRC will come after me for trading in FIs... Quote
LukeFRC Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Al Krow said: I'll take that as a "yes" then? 😅 I think I'm maybe excused from needing excuses, having bought (and subsequently moved on) 5 of these FIs over several years (starting way back in 2018)? You know, a bit like getting lifelong immunity from having had a course of vaccines? Risk is that HMRC will come after me for trading in FIs... should I send you a PM to work out how much you would sell a secondhand FI5 vip to me for? I won't tell HMRC. 1 Quote
Al Krow Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago May be a while off, we're still at F1-4 VIP methinks? 😅 Quote
LukeFRC Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Just now, Al Krow said: May be a while off, we're still at F1-4 VIP methinks? 😅 oh yeah.... oops Quote
Quatschmacher Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 56 minutes ago, Al Krow said: I'll take that as a "yes" then? 😅 I think that may be down to poor camera resolution in low artificial lighting; some of the other gear looks a bit washed out too (Mavis). That aside, what’s the issue exactly? The display is perfectly legible and you can see the foot switches to press them; what more do you need? Quote
pantherairsoft Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Quatschmacher said: I think that may be down to poor camera resolution in low artificial lighting; some of the other gear looks a bit washed out too (Mavis). That aside, what’s the issue exactly? The display is perfectly legible and you can see the foot switches to press them; what more do you need? (withdrawn, sorry, bad day) Edited 1 hour ago by pantherairsoft Withdrawn comment Quote
Quatschmacher Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago In fairness, most pedals would look crap/unreadable under strong enough direct lighting. Here’s my high-powered torch pointing at a few. One shown not shining directly. Not sure what I am missing here. Quote
LawrenceH Posted 57 minutes ago Posted 57 minutes ago The brushed metal case of the VIP looks a lot nicer in-person than these photos and videos. It's a high quality tooling and finish. But ultimately who cares, as long as it's sturdy (which it definitely is). No-one in the audience will pay it any attention and even if they do, most pedalboards look like a crappy mishmash unless you happen to have complementary visual designs across the board - or choose your pedals based on fitting a visual aesthetic over sound. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.