Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt

Finished Pics! Dreadnought acoustic (guitar) for me?


Andyjr1515

Recommended Posts

Onto the installation of the rosette and purfling circle.

This is a bit scary because it's got to be spot on.  And it involves routing a couple of mm out of a top that is only 2.7ish mm to start with!

First was to use the asymmetric holes in the centre of the cut out rosette as the template for a couple of similar holes in the top:

G8UWzl8l.jpg

Then remember not to cut out the centre until I've routed all of the other bits!

First I routed the edges of the rosette - the inner using one of the pivot holes and the outer rout using the other one  :

acnDZoLl.jpg

So - what's going on on the right hand side?

Well - it's a good illustration of a little tip for acoustic guitar rosettes: leave the join lines / gaps and test the rout position always at the neck end of the circle. 

Why?

Because that will be covered by the fretboard

And so if you pink torpedo up your measurement, measuring from the wrong side of the router bit:

6YuWIrQl.jpg 

...then you can correct it for the full circle and the pink torpedo up won't show because the fretboard will be over it ;)

Anyway - trying to remember which pivot hole to use far which area, I indexed the router a couple of mm each time each way to clear out the wood in the centre so I could fit the rosette

Then a 1mm slot on the outside for some purfling:

sFt2Rn4l.jpg

 

Then installed the purfling - it bends easily round this kind of radius dry and cold - and then some very careful scraping to bring the whole rosette down to top level and finally a deeper rout to cut out the sound hole.  And here we have it:

kk4aEbjl.jpg

 

It's lucky that the c**k up slot is going to be covered, otherwise I'd have had to have added another piece of laminate as a 'feature' 9_9

But luckily, on an acoustic, the fingerboard (or in my case it will be a stick on end magnetic pickup from a Shadow dual system) goes right up to the sound hole:

VaLRHLVl.jpg

 

I've said it before.  Many regular builders will agree that we still make as many c**k ups as when we were beginners - it's just that we get more skilled at sorting out the consequences and hiding them! :lol:

 

 

 

 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Si600 said:

It's quite interesting how non-bookmatched it looks once it's been cut out.  Especially missing the dark butterfly in the middle.

Yes - in a way a bit of a shame to lose so much of the figuring.  It will be enhanced, however, when the finish is applied.  Also it was too small a piece to use for the normal positions such as headstock plate, etc.. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit of explanation in this post of some of the design and build features of a 'typical' steel string guitar for those who haven't ever built one but might.  I stress that, after building only two acoustics before, I'm no expert but it's OK because experienced acoustic builders will have 'unfollow''d this thread long ago :lol: .    In my defence, this is still firmly in the basics territory, but it is info I would have appreciated understanding prior to embarking on my own first acoustic build.

First of all - what plan am I following?

Got one of the Elite Guitar Plans because it was easier than printing off the numerous versions on the internet and stitching together so many A4 sheets.  The design is the pretty ubiquitous one based on the Martin X brace design of yesteryear.  The plan is pretty good too, other than the spelling.

Zt27PX5l.jpg

So the basics:

  • The top is spheroidal, like a slice of a 25 foot radius football
  • The braces not only transfer the string vibrations, via the bridge and underlying bridgeplate, to various regions of the top, they also form and hold the top in the 25' radius spheroidal shape.
  • So the bottoms of the braces need to have a radius appropriate to were they will sit on the sphere
  • And for that, we use the 25' radius dish again

In pictures:

First the braces are cut to profile.  These are flat bottomed at this stage so allowances need to be made in terms of the thickness.  I also leave them long so I can trim to my planned final length based on my actual sides assembly.

1WsPwHCl.jpg

The plan shows where each of the braces will be positioned:

rxDXp0vl.jpg

 

But, at the moment, they are flat bottomed - and they need to sit unstressed in their final positions in the radius dish so that, when they are glued down into the top - done also in the radius dish - they will force and hold the top in that spheroidal shape.  And at the moment they don't...yet:

lvpKWqxl.jpg

ujVk7GJl.jpg

 

It always surprises me just how curved 25' is!  

So - the next step is to curve the bottoms of each of the braces so that they sit in the dish with no gaps.

Then we can reveal the black magic of the go-bar deck :D

Hope that makes sense to those who are interested... 

 

 

Edited by Andyjr1515
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now then, I know what some of you are thinking.

You're thinking - 'Yes - 25 feet is a tighter curve than you imagine.  And surely he's going to run out of wood to get that X-brace to fit?'

ujVk7GJl.jpg

 

Which is why I'm splicing extensions to the four ends of the X-brace struts... 9_9

zcNVTFTl.jpg

Another one for the Andyjr1515 bloopers DVD, @LukeFRC:lol:

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Andyjr1515 said:

Now then, I know what some of you are thinking.

You're thinking - 'Yes - 25 feet is a tighter curve than you imagine.  And surely he's going to run out of wood to get that X-brace to fit?'

ujVk7GJl.jpg

 

Which is why I'm splicing extensions to the four ends of the X-brace struts... 9_9

zcNVTFTl.jpg

Another one for the Andyjr1515 bloopers DVD, @LukeFRC:lol:

I work in marketing - if you ever go into acoustic guitar production I’m sure we trade mark and patent that and spin it as a positive ....:D

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Christine said:

So the braces are actually laminated?

 

🤣

Indeed - I expect the tone will be completely wrecked :lol:

 

OK - laminates (I prefer to call them scarf joints :lol: ) fixed means that the braces, fully shaped, now fit snugly in the radius dish:

PTFf2TZl.jpg

 

So with a final scrape of the top to get the harmonics back now the stiffer rosette is in, I can mark the position of the braces on the top:

0pb18mUl.jpg

 

And then get out the SUPER HI-TECH GO-BAR DECK!

RVnD9Ojl.jpg

Yes...your eyes aren't deceiving you...can this really be just two pieces of chipboard held apart by a quartet of threaded rods with the radius dish vaguely plonked on top.  Yes it can! ;)

What's it for?  Well, how else are you going to clamp down a set of different size braces across a .5mx.5m area, with enough force to press the top into the radius dish while securing all ends and middle of the braces for a strong glue joint....other than with something like a bendy dowel???

Hts2trWl.jpg 

Aided and abetted by a few more bendy dowels and a herd of bendy fibreglass rods:

feJ3OWxl.jpg

 

And to everybody's amazement the first time they try this - it works! :D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Christine said:

So the shape of the dish becomes permanent when all the braces are glued in place, very clever!  Do you not lose the harmonic qualities (is that the right term?) of the top and bottom once they're braced like that?

No - it actually enhances it.  And we get to get into the really black magic world of tap tuning...

If you thought laminating was controversial.... xD

I'll cover this soonish.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Christine said:

The extra tension in the wood does it?

I would be lying if I said I fully understood what exactly does what.

But when I was considering building my first acoustic I did a huge amount of reading and internet trawlingof what the high end makers do.  And then I went to a large guitar store and looked into the soundholes of a large number of steel string makes which bore out many of the things I'd read - that the great, great, great majority of steel strings are built to essentially the same formula

I followed every single one of the common features to the letter.  I was so pleased to have ended up with an instrument that actually held the tension of the strings that I'd have been chuffed if it had sounded like rubber bands over a baked bean can :)

But it sounded brilliant!  Like - better than my mate's Martin D18 brilliant!!!!

So how many builders and manufacturers actually understand why these features work - and understand enough to know what to tweak and where to make them even better - is probably relatively few.  I certainly don't.  But they - and I, now - do know they do work.  So, while most of my solid builds often go away from convention - and sometimes in a big way - for acoustics, I follow the formula slavishly.

And the elements in that formula?:

-  Almost all steel strings use a dished top.  There are only a couple of makers I know of who make a flat top

- The great majority of them use this identical bracing pattern - even down to a tiny sliver you will see me put on top of the x brace joint

- Even the position and height of the nodes on the braces are likely to be within a few mm of the same positions

- The back and sides makes very little difference to the tone. It pretty much matters not what they are made from as long as they are structurally rigid enough.  In many people's view, laminated sides and back makes no tonal or volume difference.

- The wood type, grain, stiffness and thickness of the top wood makes a very significant difference to tone

- As does the thickness and shape of the braces...which is where the black magic of tap tuning comes in (of which more anon)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the main structural braces secure, I now am adding the side braces.  Although these also help to maintain the spheroidal shape, their main function is to transfer the vibrations to the various parts of the top.  These are the ones that will be tweaked during the tap tuning process.

0Fo6g1Zl.jpg

First thing after the glue is set, however, will be to slim down the cross sectional profile of the braces into the familiar arch shape.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And tap tuning has begun :D

Rather than me trying to explain how it works and what you do, this is one of the best explanations I've seen.  For those who REALLY want to know why and how - at quite a detailed scientific level - watch the whole thing.  For those who want to see - and hear - exactly what he does and what difference it makes to the sound, start at 30' in.

 

Anyway - he knows what he is doing and he does this for 8 guitars a week.  I don't and this is my 3rd acoustic ;)

But it's started and it's made a difference.  Mine doesn't sound like his, though :lol:

Here's where I started:

acEYwJ5l.jpg

And this is after slimming the struts to rough arch shapes (It's OK - it will be eventually sanded properly):

TjdW6mdl.jpg

 

And since then, I've done a reasonable amount of tap tuning.  It's having the under-bridge plate glued at the moment - when that's set, I'll take a shot so you can see where and how I've tweaked the braces.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...