paul_5 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 (edited) Would have been 77 today. [media]http://youtu.be/KqtELR5GyfI[/media] Massive loss. Edited January 30, 2013 by paul_5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hutton Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I never get tired listening to a Jamerson bassline. Thanks for posting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discreet Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 So fresh and spontaneous. Timeless. Makes you believe that take was the first time he'd ever played it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geek99 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Apparently he had to do about 60 takes of years of a clown, in order to satisfy the producers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pobrien_ie Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 [quote name='Geek99' timestamp='1359546224' post='1956299'] Apparently he had to do about 60 takes of years of a clown, in order to satisfy the producers [/quote] I'm not sure about that. That track had Bob Babbitt on bass.....unless that's the reason why!! Also from what I've read he was pretty untouchable and got little or no grief from anybody in the early days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geek99 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 (edited) Not quite - read "standing in the shadows of Motown" Babbitt himself said that people's work was often replaced after they thought they were finished and had left. Read what he say bout mock contracts and getting paid Babbitt tells a story of listening to a jukebox and arguing with Jamerson about who was playing the bassline Edited January 30, 2013 by Geek99 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pobrien_ie Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Yeah it was pretty lax back then, probably why the Carol Kaye claims can't be 100% discounted. I'm fairly sure that it's been pretty much agreed since that it's Babbitt though. Even the Jamerson tribute site (bassland I think) doesn't credit it to Jamerson. I'm no expert on their styles, but that would be a very restrained and structured bassline for Jamerson. Even the basic lines he played had some interesting parts. That's not disrespecting the bass line of Babbitt though..it's exactly what the song needs. And back to the track, What's Going On, was that the one he played while drunk and lying flat on his back?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paul_5 Posted January 30, 2013 Author Share Posted January 30, 2013 [quote name='pobrien_ie' timestamp='1359549956' post='1956385'] And back to the track, What's Going On, was that the one he played while drunk and lying flat on his back?! [/quote] Not like you can tell, but yes, so the story goes... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yepmop Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Massive loss - he made compex bass lines sound so simple, just love listening to that old Motown stuff, must get me some LaBella's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowender Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 WHen it comes to electric bass, there's James Jamerson, Paul McCartney, and everyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geek99 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 @pobrien_ie Possibly the recorded version [b]is[/b] Babbitt, doesnt mean that the book is wrong about Jamerson doing lots of takes. Smokey and Norman, Whitfield were such control freaks that hey may have put a Babbitt track on after jamerson did those takes because they didnt like what he did.. He did have a free hand but he did also have a serious temper and the drink didnt help it. Babbitt said he went to question the residuals he was getting and found contracts for tracks that he knew he had played on, but made out to other people, so I dont think even the players themselves know for certain. The residuals wer paid on the basis of these contracts, many of which were written out after the fact. They were known as "mock contracts" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pobrien_ie Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 [quote name='Geek99' timestamp='1359558391' post='1956612'] @pobrien_ie Possibly the recorded version [b]is[/b] Babbitt, doesnt mean that the book is wrong about Jamerson doing lots of takes. Smokey and Norman, Whitfield were such control freaks that hey may have put a Babbitt track on after jamerson did those takes because they didnt like what he did.. He did have a free hand but he did also have a serious temper and the drink didnt help it. Babbitt said he went to question the residuals he was getting and found contracts for tracks that he knew he had played on, but made out to other people, so I dont think even the players themselves know for certain. The residuals wer paid on the basis of these contracts, many of which were written out after the fact. They were known as "mock contracts" [/quote] Yeah fair point. I have the book too, but don't remember tears of a clown being mentioned. Good reason to read it again I suppose. I know Ed Friedland's R&B bass book mentions it as a Jamerson track too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geek99 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Yes you're right - ed does say that. I'll look up the clown page and give you a reference - I only read it a couple of nights ago Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pobrien_ie Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 On a slightly related note.... I have a bass playing friend who was born on the day Jamerson died. I always think he might be JJ reincarnate , although he's a singer/songwriter more than anything! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lojo Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 Never knew I shared my birthday with him, that's made me smile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discreet Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 [quote name='lojo' timestamp='1359575684' post='1956976'] Never knew I shared my birthday with him, that's made me smile [/quote] Happy Birthday! 21 again, is it..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lojo Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 [quote name='discreet' timestamp='1359575796' post='1956979'] Happy Birthday! 21 again, is it..? [/quote] Cheers Double that and add 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discreet Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 [quote name='lojo' timestamp='1359575948' post='1956982'] Double that and add 2 [/quote] So you're still just a young strip of a lad! Have a great evening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rw3cja Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 For all who may be interested, here is my Jamerson Analysed blog. Feel free to take a look! http://jamersonanalysed.blogspot.co.uk/ Cheers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.