whynot Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 What's the difference apart from 300 watts? And does that 300 watts make much difference in an otherwise near identical amp? I'm looking to go back down the micro head path and these 2 are on my radar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skychaserhigh Posted October 13, 2011 Share Posted October 13, 2011 The 600 is grey and the 900 is silver. I went for the 900 because it's not much more money for the extra power. If you get the 600 there may be times when you wonder if you should have gone for the 900 ! The Streamliner is a fantastic amp though and I'm sure you will be more than happy with whichever one you choose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonbass Posted October 13, 2011 Share Posted October 13, 2011 I've got the 900. At bass direct the £80 difference for 300 watts seems pretty good value. Never tried the 600, but looks like there's no difference in features, so it all comes down to headroom. The only problem I've had so far is a scratchy main volume knob, but that really doesn't bother me. With the gain, make up volume and main volume controls it is still very easy to access low volumes for practice though. It does sound amazing, and it is so simple that it really is almost impossible to make it sound bad! Andy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmccombe7 Posted October 13, 2011 Share Posted October 13, 2011 I went for the 600 and have started with a classic rock 5 piece and this is by far loud enough. Running at 8 ohm with an Ampeg 8x10 and its still only at 50% on the master volume although it depends on where the gain set is. Great sounding warm tube amp. Dave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highfox Posted October 13, 2011 Share Posted October 13, 2011 This week I got to try out my new 600 with the band. @ 4 ohm through my GB Neox212t I didn't have to set the master past 10 0clock with the gain and volume sat at 12 to get a fat, warm and articualte sound. Lots of power left in the tank should I need it. I had been using and was happy with the Shuttle 6, but now find the extended rounder low end I'm getting with the 600 nice as well as being able to dial down the gain and get a pretty clean uncolured sound if needed as well at least to my ears. Nice amp! 600 or 900 good choice np. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musicman20 Posted October 13, 2011 Share Posted October 13, 2011 For me, i got a great deal on the 900 so went for that. REALLY good amp. I was tempted to sell as I needed something more 'flat', but, the amp is that good I had to keep it and just get another amp! Sounds crisp, warm, and punchy. LOTS of low end thud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whynot Posted October 13, 2011 Author Share Posted October 13, 2011 Thanks Guys. I was on the lookout for either model and since OP may have landed a used 600, so hopefully will have that next week. Currently have a Barefaced Super 12T so will be interesting to hear the two together. [quote name='Musicman20' timestamp='1318518392' post='1403236'] Sounds crisp, warm, and punchy. LOTS of low end thud. [/quote] Just the description of what I'm looking for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vibrating G String Posted October 15, 2011 Share Posted October 15, 2011 6 pounds to 6.5 pounds. So the 900 is ever so slightly less likely to get yanked off a cabinet by the cord. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.gif.9ad672bb8b84505709f76b39c8c256ec.gif)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.