EBS_freak
-
Posts
13,875 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by EBS_freak
-
Obviously, measure for the correct size... https://www.accu.co.uk/lightweight-round-ribbed-inserts/582828-HRLRI-10-11-5-PE?uk_google_shopping=1&c=3&gclid=CjwKCAjwiOCgBhAgEiwAjv5whPvJcaHkK7mVHcScNti4yPHJl4h27jbf9VdHvn7p9IZUiPB5UK1Y8hoCZ-IQAvD_BwE Or, dowels, sand flat and apply appropriate Goonies sticker.
-
Great Live stream with Brooksy's Bass Corner last night!
EBS_freak replied to joe_geezer's topic in General Discussion
Hi @Mike Brooks- just checking out your affiliate links. Be wary when you cut and copy it can truncate and just leave you with some ...s on the end that leaves you with broken links. -
Compact budget PA set-up to put bass through (without back-line).
EBS_freak replied to Al Krow's topic in PA set up and use
Im saying nothing. -
Suspect that you are clipping on summing. Roll back your aux sends on each channel by the same amount.
-
In the analogue world, yes.
-
Eh? I think I understand what you are saying. One to one, not one to many.
-
Yes - it's radio. But payload is used to transmit digital packets, so when you connect, it could be a case that it negotiates a one to one connection. Certainly you can't do multiple connections with ULXD (granted thats not IEM though (wireless mic system)). That also offers a encrypted/non encrypted connection... however, I believe the peering is negotiated to lock in a pairing.
-
I'd wager you'll be OK. When you are gigging - and certainly when everybody is playing, you probably wont notice it. And you'd still probably take it as it will still be more clear and have all the IEM advantages over using a traditional monitor.
-
Yeah - it's a pairing. As such, I *dont* think that you can have multiple receivers receiving the same mix from one transmitter (but dont quote me on this). Also means you cant do the two seperate mixes by using Focus mode either.
-
Thats the quality of the gate and compander in play. If it's any consolation, the chances of you hearing this when playing in a band context is low. Its worse because you are listening close. I know theres a fair few BCers who are happy with the LD in a live context. (Granted they may not of heard any alternatives) If you want to improve this from an analogue system, you'll need to dig deep into your pockets - even the Sennheiser has a bit of residual hiss, the Shure is the best - but you pay through the nose for it. Otherwise, I reckon the 5.8 Ghz digital system is the way - that should get rid of the compander... and should be clear as a whistle. Granted, again more money than the LD setup. The 2.4 Xvive is probably your next best bet - but that will be mono. I know you don't want to hear it - but I don't tend to recommend much from the analogue world - Shure EW300 G2+ and Shure 900+ (or 300 with the pro pack) being my go to.
-
I watch with interest. Will keep an eye open for the video.
-
Tonex. Surely this pre is dead before it's even begun?
-
Worth noting that 823-832 is part of the shared mic license (fee based) as opposed to the 863-865 free, no license required, frequencies.
-
It's not just the proximity that can lead to interference, it's more accurately where intermodulation occurs. However having said that, the frequencies are so far apart, if intermodulation does occur, it's likely to be inconsequential and certainly low enough power and beyond the 5th order to be concerned about. If this means nothing to you and you want to to understand intermodulation, here's a good 5 min read - https://www.shure.com/en-US/performance-production/louder/all-about-wireless-intermodulation-distortion
-
Always liked this song. Nice. I wonder if you get through a shed load of E strings! (Appreciate this is probably how the song should be played for all the subtle glissandos). Top work. I enjoyed it - haven't watched these kinda vids for a while so this was a nice one to stumble onto!
-
Compact budget PA set-up to put bass through (without back-line).
EBS_freak replied to Al Krow's topic in PA set up and use
Buy once, buy right... ...oh. -
Compact budget PA set-up to put bass through (without back-line).
EBS_freak replied to Al Krow's topic in PA set up and use
Somebody's got to keep the economy going! -
Compact budget PA set-up to put bass through (without back-line).
EBS_freak replied to Al Krow's topic in PA set up and use
It’s the middle digit in the RCF models that gets you the benefits! The more you can offload through the horn, the better. -
Possibly. Again, it depends. It's probably somewhere on the boundary of high SPL and resonance...
-
Psychology. It's still a point though - the feeling of high SPL stage could certainly influence how you mentally feel on stage.
-
Been there. Amp on a stand at knee height firing up a the guitarist and across the stage (basically at 90 degrees to the mics)
-
Compact budget PA set-up to put bass through (without back-line).
EBS_freak replied to Al Krow's topic in PA set up and use
Woah, now we are on the fringe of thread descending into chaos. Sub placement, separation, stacking, cross firing... or... cardioid! Oops - forgot to include... the answer to underpowered band pub sub placement is normally coupling with a wall! (And then there's the risk of your band turning into swampy bass mush. Use with caution! ) -
Compact budget PA set-up to put bass through (without back-line).
EBS_freak replied to Al Krow's topic in PA set up and use
Thats a very brave statement. Not all pubs are equal. It also depends whether you are filling a dance floor with music... or the whole venue.
