mario_buoninfante

Yeah, I got in touch with G&L, their reply is above. Again, nothing is really a major issue, but I was surprised by all these little things I found on the bass. It's OK though. Thanks for sharing your experience

I decided to write G&L and ask about the bridge and here's the answer: I replied that in my case I believe it's borderline, but OK. I also believe that this is an issue though. All instruments have tolerance, and on some other basses this could be a bigger issue.

Reggie Washington and David Gilmore (and others) at Clapham Grand in London in a couple of weeks

I think I know what's the issue with the saddle-lock. They use (at least on this bass, I don't know if it's true on all the lefties out there) the same bridge they use on the right-handed version! The screw is on the same side (towards me on my bass, towards the pots on the RH version). The problem with that is that the E string saddle usually is closer to the bridge that the G string saddle, so the peg is not located at the right height! @JottoSW1 I think you bought an L2000 tribute, right? Could you let me know if your bridge has the same issue? And if the saddle-lock screw is on the top side of the bridge? I got to know about the guitarguitar deal via your post on the Southpaw Spotted thread, that's why I'm asking

Hi all, I just got a G&L L2000 Tribute (Lefty) made in Indonesia, and wanted to share some thoughts and get some feedback too. First thing I'd like to say is that, I like the bass. I really like it. Both sound and feeling (I'd have never thought I'd like so much that chunky neck!). That said, one thing I was a bit surprised was the overall quality, especially after reading so much about it all over the internet. Again, before I share the things that surprised me a little bit, I'd like to also say that in general I think the quality is really high for what I paid, and also more in general is a good quality instrument that feels solid, playable, etc.. So, here's my findings (most of them with attached picture) the nut isn't well finished and is a bit "worn" around the strings (the inside is fine) there was quite a lot of white dust in most of the 6 bolts (not a big deal for sure) next to one of the bolt edges there was something like a sticker residue (easy to get rid of) 1 of the 3 switches has the washer mounted in a different direction compared to the other 2 (they have a little "tongue") the fretting job isn't really excellent - frets themselves are good (no sharp ones), but on the side of the fretboard you can see some marks there are at least 2 indents, 1 on headstock next to the 1st tuner machine, 1 on the body where it joins the neck the action is good but I had to work on the intonation a little bit once I setup the instrument (I moved the saddles in order to work on the intonation, that is really good now), I noticed that the bridge lock (the little peg that pushes the saddles) barely touches the E string saddle (that I had to push a little bit towards the bridge) the 3 knobs are a little bit "askew" As a benchmark, I also have a Spector Legend Classic 4 (maybe slightly more expensive, but roughly in the same ball park), and there I haven't seen any of these issues. I was just curious to see whether or not this is something other people have found on their G&L Tribute too. For the records, none of these things are a show-stopper for me. I'm fine with instruments not being perfect, as long as there aren't major issues and the functionality hasn't been affected/compromised at all. Also, I think something in my list might have been done at the shop, but certain things are definitely things that came with the instrument.

Ok, I see! I think we just keep misunderstanding each other. But, don't be sorry I appreciate the thought.

@Baloney Balderdash that's quite a reply, isn't it? let's recap and see what I (have not?) understood I never expressed an interest in going "amp-less" (with amp here I mean the amplifier circuit), so I was clarifying that. what is "this" that I'd need to work? and why would I need anything that simulates amp and cab. actually since my initial post I'm saying that I'm after a "neutral" amp (amplifier circuit), so I shouldn't have to simulate anything there at all. I do have a studio, so professional mixer, headphones, studio monitors, etc. this is not the problem, and that's why I believe my initial post might have been misunderstood and hence why I replied to you before trying to clarify what I meant. then, about your last kind reply: again, what is "that"? I don't think I ever mentioned a "regular" amp anywhere. but also, could you define what "regular" means? I never said I want, this whole post is started with me expressing an interest in not doing that. honestly, I'd invite you to be a bit more polite and less "hostile". I did read what you wrote, and am also sure I understood what you wrote. but even if I didn't, please just be polite. no need to be rude or aggressive, seriously. the beautiful thing about this forum is that people can freely talk and share experiences and knowledge. so, if there is something I don't know or understand, help me understanding it, teach me, but don't write things like this, because it's just counterproductive. couple of things about the cabinet. that has never been at the centre of the conversation, I mentioned it because I do wanna use one, and yes a full range (just for the records). but I wasn't thinking I want to mic that up, atm at least. anyway, the cab thing is one for another time.

I see what you are saying @Baloney Balderdash, but just to be clear, I'm not trying to get rid of the amp. I would simply like to find a neutral amp (to pair with a cabinet) that doesn't affect my bass+preamp+pedals sound, if that makes sense. At least on paper, I just find redundant going through 2 preamps (pedal and amp preamp). Not because you won't get a good sound, thousands of people do, but because I'd like to have 1 sound, whether or not I'm using the amplifier. Hope that makes sense.

ok, just found out about this now and couldn't not share it https://www.thomann.de/gb/stompenberg_devices.html#

more dub than reggae, but I recently bought this and it's really heavy and good

interestingly enough, I got in touch with Laney to ask about the Digbeth Pre, since I have one, and they told me the output level is +10 dBV. unless I'm missing something obvious, that seems quite a bit to me. (I also sent a second email asking to confirm it's +10 and not -10 dBV, they confirmed it's +10).

I never tried one myself, but I'd like too. one thing I don't particularly like is the 3 band EQ. I'm a big fan of 4 band ones

Here's a YT video that might be useful

Really interesting post. I do believe that as a musician the most important of the 2 is art. There are so many things that human beings do well in life without knowing anything about the "science" behind it. That said, knowledge is a good thing though and so, I think it's important to have a basic understanding of the tools used to make art. Just the way painters used to (maybe still do) make their own colours and brushes. In terms of "flat/perfect" frequency responses, I doubt anything with it would sound great. Humans are imperfect and attracted by imperfections, also our hearing (as pointed out already) is anything but perfect. Few days ago I was looking at these headphones measurements. In a similar way, even some really expensive and "good sounding" HPs have "terrible" graphs https://www.stereophile.com/content/innerfidelity-headphone-measurements

Hi, I found this on YT and quite liked it. They compare several famous bass amps, playing different styles and basses, reamping, and recording the actual cabinet, no DI (this I found particularly good). No Ampeg and GK and other big names, but still quite good. I saw they used the EQ in various situations and that surely affected the results, but overall I think it's a good video. Personally, I was impressed by the Little Mark III by Mark Bass. It has personality but seems to stay true to the instrument. Aguilar pretty good too, but a bit too clinical. Surprised by Hartke too, that for whatever reason I never considered. PJB is a bit of a weird one. To me it always sounds like is lacking the "low lows" (maybe speaker size matters afterall ). Eden, well it colours the sound quite a bit, but I love that 90-00s scooped sound though Interested in hearing other opinions, especially if anybody has one of those amps.

absolutely, I 100% agree. I'm a big fan of detailed specs.

that's fair. I did see some official videos (in Italian though) on YT where the presenter was saying one could even go straight into that with their bass. I think it's the gain stage they have in place that allows that.

I need to try this with my setup too. I'll report the results

thanks for this, it's really useful!

I start thinking that the GR Bass Pure Amp might just be the ideal solution for this, since they also have a gain stage in case the preamp doesn't provide enough signal.

from its manual

it seems like this can drive a power amp too https://www.premierguitar.com/tech-21-geddy-lee-yyz-signature-sansamp

that's interesting too

just found this too. not sure I want to buy an Ampeg to bypass its pre though

sure, bypassing the EQ is already something!