bremen

Leave it. They'll put their own stuff up when they're ready. What's the worst that could happen anyway; might even lead to some comedy at their expense.

[quote name='xilddx' timestamp='1365252819' post='2037222'] OOOH! Good call!! Me, it would have to be Linton Kwesi Johnson '80s / '90s, or maybe one of Adrian Sherwood's bands. [/quote] Tackhead! While were in the area of AS and Denis Bovell...the Slits? That would have been scary fun.

[quote name='xilddx' timestamp='1365241994' post='2037060'] If I had to pick another, and providing I'd had the educashum, it would have to be Zappa's bands, any line up from early '70s to '88 would do [/quote] Beat me to it. Or Steel Pulse, that would be nice.

I haven't looked, but I know its bollocks.

[quote name='chris_b' timestamp='1364899712' post='2032261'] Stage craft? Oh dear! I wish it wasn't so, but I make John Entwistle look animated. [/quote] You, Entwistle and Family Man Barrett. Must be doing something right ;-)

"keep your drinks off my headstone", brilliant.

I get a lot more attention playing upright than I ever did prancing about with a bass guitar!

[quote name='hunt the shunt' timestamp='1364651435' post='2029231'] What on earth do you think you will achieve adding a 1x15 to a kilowatt 8x10 rig??? [/quote] He just wants his roady to hate him more.

I don't think you'd notice the difference in volume between otherwise identical 8 and 4 ohm cabs. It's less than 3dB difference.

Balcro has pointed out that when I said 16mm I actually meant 165...d'oh!

[quote name='Spoombung' timestamp='1364329559' post='2025036'] I typed an answer then deleted it. It's always the same with your questions, Silddx [/quote] I totally agree with the points you made. It's always the same with your posts, Spoom

I've always reckoned there's more folk here who value holding a groove, supporting a song or making a fearful racket than who go for virtuosity.

Before you do any soundproofing/treatment/planning, spend a week browsing this: http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/index.php?sid=df3c503a4984b43b0b4f9c9f08700fed

Edited again for misplaced decimal point! According to winisd, you should get a decent response and power handling from a 100mm pipe 165mm long. That's tuned to 32Hz, so you've still got 300W power handling down to 30Hz. Response is 3dB down at 70Hz and 11dB at 32Hz. Power handling drops to 130W about 55Hz, mind, so it might fart out a little there. I don't think you can avoid that limitation with your chosen driver though. Should be punchy enough. It won't boom if it's adequately braced.

[quote name='ChickenKiev' timestamp='1364220541' post='2023333'] Would I be able to use an Ampeg SVP Pro with my Hartke 3500 head? Sorry I'm probably sounding like a complete and utter noob-nugget right now.. [/quote] Yes you could.

[quote name='BigRedX' timestamp='1364210113' post='2023115'] No but what you are going to get is two lots of active EQ which may or may not conflict depending on how you have them adjusted. I'm not a big fan of on-board pre-amps for basses, because I believe that you should EQ once in your signal chain and do it at the point where it is most effective. This normally means at your amp. It is generally the place where the least amount of restrictions have been imposed on the circuit design, either from power requirements or space. Any compromises in the EQ on your amp have been done because the designer wanted to, not because they had to through lack of space or the need to power it off 9V batteries, and IMO if you can't get a decent sound out of just your amp, then it is the wrong one for you, and you should change it. [/quote] I totally agree with exactly half that I don't think the eq in the bass will conflict with the eq in the pedal. After all, you can always just set one flat. And I don't agree that you should only EQ once. A typical recording chain might see eq applied by a Sansamp, the desk, then eqd again in mixdown, at mastering and finally by the (shudder) graphic equaliser in the car. And if using a pedal makes the amp you already own sound great, why buy a new amp? The bits I do agree with, fwiw, are: I don't go for onboard eq for the same reasons as bigREDex, and share his less-is-more philosophy. If it was grinding and clanking I was after I'd go for a Sansamp, or an Ampeg SVP pro. And a Precision with new stainless steel roundwounds

No, worst that could happen is you'll get some extra distortion from the overdrive pedal that you'll be able to get rid of by turning down the bass and/or input gain on pedal.

This: ' This random placement causes obstacles for electrons and when encountered this interference can cause noise, slow down electron flow and sound deterioration affecting the quality of the sound of the vacuum tube.' sounds like absolute twaddle to me. Replacing the cheapo Chinese valves in my SVP with groove tubes did make it quieter and less microphonic, though. Why do you want to be more attractive to women anyway? You're beating them off with a sh1tty stick as it is. I'd just practise the bass a bit more.

[quote name='discreet' timestamp='1363726119' post='2016711'] Good God, they're not cheap are they..? [/quote] They are in the long term though, aren't they. Flats are keepers; you just rent rounds.

[quote name='brensabre79' timestamp='1363613877' post='2014728'] This is the Xmax / Cone excursion issue with a 20cm dia. port at 32.12cm length. Should I be worried about this? [/quote] You'll always get large excursions below resonance. But its a usefully low frequency, use a steep high pass filter and all will be well.

Too good to be true....but where's the scam?

[quote name='fatback' timestamp='1363536433' post='2013755'] The 'why do we need to perform live?' Q puzzled me for years until I heard the great Rabbath explain. He says the adrenalin slows down time, so you have forever to form each note, and that's a very special thing. Spot on. No amount of rehearsal gets that adrenalin going. You have to have an audience. [/quote] Love it, never thought of it that way before.

What drivers are you using, what size cab and what port frequency do you fancy?

[quote name='brensabre79' timestamp='1363373126' post='2012086'] Wow OK, thanks! what about the port though? [/quote] Ah, the port. If you calculate the port for one speaker, then four such ports will work. Presumably that means you can then replace them with one of the same length but for times the area. I'm not 100% sure about that though. I could model a random speaker in WinISD and check...hang on...