mcc

Believe me, I would... but I live overseas, so taking anything heavier than plans is out of the question. thanks for the help. [quote name='alexclaber' post='477827' date='May 2 2009, 05:30 PM']As everyone's already said, you can't just reduce the thickness of ply and expect it to perform well - the thinner the ply gets, the more bracing you have to add. So although weight goes down the build complexity/time goes up - but if you're building the cab yourself and you have the time and are precise with your woodwork then there's nothing to lose (other than unwanted weight!) As I've demonstrated a few times you can not only sit on my cabs, you can stand on them and jump up and down! I'd recommend both greenboy's fEarful plans and Bill F's Omni/DR ones - if you're looking for small/light the Omni 10.5 is a good approach. And if you mind you have more money than time then you know where to come! Alex[/quote]

Thanks for the comments, definitely thinking of plywood ... I'm drooling over the omni 10 and 15. If they can deliver what they promise I might give them a shot !!!. How frustrating I have to wait until I get back home in September. Now I really hate studying. [quote name='Musky' post='477599' date='May 2 2009, 10:58 AM']You could always build a BFM Omni 10.5. [url="http://www.billfitzmaurice.com"]http://www.billfitzmaurice.com[/url] If I remember rightly they weigh in at around 28-32lbs, depending on the density of the ply you use. You can trim the weight a bit by using 1/2" ply.[/quote]

Hi, I have built my own speaker cabs in the past but mainly copying one from a reputable make. I just got myself a Ashdown Little Giant and wondered if I could make a relatively small and light cab for it. Not to use its full power, but to use in those practice situations were a mini combo is not enough. My question is , what effect does a decrease in wood thickness bring to the cab, lets say down from 3/4" to 1/2" or less? I obviously expect it to be less durable (not a good candidate for sitting on), but besides that would the lower rigidity compromise sound?? In what way?? thanks

+1 for the IBANEZ SR300 series (305 in my case) and the YAMAHA BB cheapos (can't remember the model, maybe also a 300). the pickups were their weak side.... Now all my basses cost in the £400-500 range, and what I appreciate of them is quality electronics, comfortable necks and that they make me want to pick them up and play (2nd hand Status's and a Musicman SUB5). The graphite neck also means it never goes out of tune. I think that from 500 up, you just pay for amazing finishes, exotic woods and the inherent satisfaction of having a rare bass. This probably nobody will notice except for one or two drooling bassplayers in the crowd. [quote name='Toddy' post='474436' date='Apr 28 2009, 06:07 PM'][url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbS226u_f4Q"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbS226u_f4Q[/url] Check Nathan Williams,,,, £200 Cort Bass a loop an no effects... Blew me away at the London Guitar Show... Cant seem to find a dealer tho![/quote]

I actually like the more aggressive flying Vs (in guitar actually, like jacksons) IMHO. Not being able to play it sitting down is a drawback and quite annoying.... Normally cheap instruments save on the expensive to fix stuff like earthing, electronics, tunners... etc so try before you buy. In any case I think if you are considering a Thunderbird..... wow, I think it kicks the FV's behind anytime .... keep your money and get the T-bird. Also Epiphone have proven to be reliable. [quote name='silddx' post='461912' date='Apr 14 2009, 11:15 AM']I nearly bought a headless transparent plexi Steinberger copy for about £150. I GASed for it because of looks. I am SO glad I held off. It would be worth naff all. Save up, get a decent instrument. Forget that V.[/quote]

I knew I was reading up to the end of the thread for something..... thanks for the tip...... ordering now!!!! [quote name='bassmansky' post='459474' date='Apr 10 2009, 05:55 PM']that is a bargain,enjoy![/quote]