tayste_2000

Apparently you can still use your ears with the Visual Volume pedal. It will be wider than the EB

[quote name='dood' post='46397' date='Aug 16 2007, 01:06 PM']OMG! Wooh! I got a name check! COOOEL! ;o) - You are quite correct though... I personally really couldnt be dealing with piles of pedals and controllers all over the floor. I much prefer my POD xt rack and the TC GForce. Everything gets done in a rack and controlled by a single MIDI footboard with CC outboard if necessary. Just my preference though. Not saying it is right.. just uber-tidy for me.[/quote] You have to bare in mind you sound rubbish though

Get a Visual Volume pedal instead and it will do either

[quote name='G-bitch' post='46343' date='Aug 16 2007, 12:08 PM']Only worth the investment for a pro or extreme - like far, far worse than Tayste or Dood - gear whore who needs to combine different amps, pre's, rackmount fx, stomp boxes etc. in any configuration imaginable.[/quote] Actually I'm getting close to this as I'm switching basses, amps, pedals and levels of blend from my board But I'm considering the T-rex Mac1 as it has 2 blendable effect loops

Check out the Subdecay Quasar

Vibrator works much better check the guess the effect thread

You get a better synth tone using Octave, Fuzz and Filter Also good is the Subdecay Noise box its like an input section from a 70's analog synth but its a bit hard to control.

[quote name='1976fenderhead' post='42962' date='Aug 8 2007, 04:50 PM']I strongly disagree on 2 things: I'd never put the Fuzz before the 105q. That gives it a synthy effect that loses all the distortion when the wah is engaged and that's not what I want. I want the Timmy C effect, not the Cliff Burton one. Might be what some people want, but swaping those 2 around gives such different results that it's not a matter of what sounds better but what result suits you best. It's also so easy to spot the difference it's really worth to try and pick by yourself, you'd have to be deaf not to have a favourite... And I'd never use the compressor after all those effects either. I used to prefer it after the wah, then I decided I preferred it before. Not a big difference. But to me it definitely makes it all sound worse after chorus or fuzz. Not to mention that it maximizes any noise that goes into it, so a fuzz before it's pretty much the worse you could do regarding noise in the signal... Ultimately, try it all and chose with your own ears! Most of it is pretty easy to decide once you hear it.[/quote] Apart from your minimising the signal going into your fuzz and you lose a lot of touch response from a fuzz, it is all personaly preference at the end of the day I love dirt pedals and just have transparent limting from a decent rack compressor. Personally on the wah if it was me I'd have dist before and after it or stick it in a wobo loop so youi can reverse it and do both, then you get best of both worlds.

Bass - OC-2 - Digitech BSW - Big Muff - Bass Wah - CE-2 - Small Stone - TR-2 - Delay - CS-3 - DT-10(Though this could also go first but I like them last so I can mute any hum or setup some effects in silent mode before a song a starts) Reason for this is CS-3 last will give you all the limiting you need make sure you don't get any nasty peaks. Fuzz into Wah sounds best Chorus into Phaser will give you huge swooshy noises and isn't that great the other way around Octaver needs to be first to track as well as possibly BSW needs to be as close to beginning as possible as well also synth and octave in Fuzz, Phaser, Wah and Trem will give you the synthy sound where as other orders aren't that great. Delay last is the most useful but you can get some great sounds earlier but it is limiting.