[quote name='JamesBass' timestamp='1354384253' post='1885453']
This may lead to my looking like a right dunce here but; Has anyone ever experimented with Oak as a body wood? I'm looking at all the options available to me in terms of my next bass, even looking at maybe going down the custom route with which I've been pondering what my ideal Bass would be made from and I notice that no Luthiers are advertising the use of Oak, is there a reason other than the density and price as to why there aren't oak basses out there? What's Oaks tonal qualities as opposed to Maple, Ash or Mahogany?
Thanks
[/quote]
Oak is only (very) approx 10% heavier than ash, so make the body 10% thinner, so rather than a jazz bass being 42mm thick, simply make it out of oak but only 38mm thick. There is no need for a body to be standard thickness and reducing it down 4mm is not noticable when playing.
Oak is one of the prettiest woods out there! A local exotic wood supplier near me has some outstanding highly figured brown oak which would make a great looking bass. Price certainly isnt a factor as oak is pretty cheap compared to most 'luthier' woods
It's no harder to work with that some of the denser exotic woods such as wenge, ebony, cocobolo etc and easier to finish and glue than some rosewoods
I dont know about tone, body material has such a small effect on tone that it's probably not noticable and any difference could be fixed with an eq tweek on the amp. My guess is that it would be similar to ash (tight low end) but with a touch extra brightness due to the stiffness and mass not damping out high frequencies. so probably really good.
So there is no reason why a bass shouldnt be made out of oak, it's just we're all too hung up on ash / alder/ mahogany and maple to look too far out from the norm.
Do it !!! and post pictures