Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

NickA

Member
  • Posts

    1,249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NickA

  1. My dadarrio hybrid strings are 20 yrs old, my Spiro's came with the bass 32 years ago. Only last year I upgraded to a 2nd hand set of Spiro's from a basschatter .. those may be less than 10 years old! They last forever really; only change them when they break or when I fancy a change of sound.
  2. Off topic .. I have often wondered if the traditional wooden things with all those fancy and expensively carved curly bits really is the optimal design ... But got to beat that instrument of torture!
  3. Whichever one @owen has is pretty much as good an eub as you can get. Does the big fretless sound with the magnetic pickups and a pretty good dB sound with the piezos, very playable too. Forget which model, perhaps the man will let us know.
  4. We already had this discussion . My 4/4 bass fits easily in A Skoda citigo ( neck in the footwell method ) with an amp ( pjb flightcase) in the boot. Any car will do.
  5. Check the weight of the kk mind. Nothing baby about it .. if that's an issue. Big solid body on them. Re dots on the fingerboard ... . No dots on a double bass as they were invented for classical music, and when you're reading music you can't look at your fingers. You don't really need them as the heel of the neck gives a good reference to where your hand is and muscle memory kicks in with practice. Can be harder on an eub as they don't all have that reference point ( you can add one though). Even us classical musos add pencil marks ( or even drill tiny holes ) on occassion though; used for finding a difficult note after a 45 bar rest!
  6. In the orchestra we make sure not to change direction at the same time ... doesn't work if you're the only bassist of course! Helps to ease the pressure at the end of each stroke too. A slight variation in volume being better than loud, silent, loud, silent ...
  7. A better use for the necks IMHO. That twin 5-string must be unliftable (chambered or not).
  8. True. I stand corrected. Looked it up. His Eflat Bari goes down to A, which is really a C , so my double bass goes a whole sixth lower and the 5-string ebass a whole 10th. Proportionately, that's a lot of Hz difference.
  9. Still wondering how @fishman came upon a pro 1e without its body or bridge! That carbon strip in the neck btw is unique to early Wals. The customs, mk1s, 2s, 3s and pro 1 reissues don't have it. The necks changed from hornbeam, mahogany and maple to just mahogany and maple at some point too. "Engineered" indeed.
  10. Regarding double basses.. also not very loud. I think they have to be that big not so much to get the scale length as to get a body big enough to couple such low frequencies into the air and project them away from the instrument .. and THAT determines the long scale. Same reason a 1x15" cab will generally project better bass than a 1x 8" and why my not that loud pjb rig needs 10x 5" speakers. it's about impedance matching and diffraction to be technical. So yes I agree, depth probably isn't a major factor, but size of the table surely is. Hence a shortish scale but big bodied Mexican guitarra is louder than an abg and a double bass louder still. ...doesnt explain, though, how my mate's barritone sax has a bottom note lower than my double bass, yet is much louder, despite a bell diameter of less than 6"..
  11. Look good. Bigger usually being louder. 6" or 8" depth! ( my tanglewood is only 4" at the top and 5" at the bottom. bet they're quite pricey.
  12. Me too. Of everything I could find to try in shops, this was the best. The fenders only worked well plugged in. I'd have had an ovation if I could have found one ... the sort with the round hole very good acoustically and the b768 style great plugged in. The tanglewood is a big beast, so comparatively loud, but still too quiet to be heard against even a couple of guitars and a fiddle. Interested to hear I could use electric bass strings on it. Might try an old set of nyxls.
  13. Bryant's are notoriously playable ( once the "fixes" have been applied, and this one is all fixed up ). Scale is usually 40.5 inches ... My own bass is 44 inches ... So definitely 3/4. One of my orchestra colleagues has a 5-string Bryant soloist, she's about 5ft 1" and plays it much better than I manage my big German beast. Less character than mine, I think, and quieter .. but also maintenance free. Plus getting one with a swell back ... If I had the space to put a second double bass, I'd be racing you to Hebden Bridge! Plus Bryant has retired, so prices will only go up.
  14. Had a case when it was on ebay- kleinanzeigen.de. Case included?
  15. I shouldn't worry about the neck profile too much. There are bigger issues with playing a 5; namely: damping, fingering patterns and relearning coordination between the string you fret and the string you pluck! For one thing, with a five you can play most things higher up the neck, so though the neck is wider, the frets are closer together. Main probem i found with buying a 5 was finding one whose B string didn't sound like it was a different instrument from the other 4 strings (fenders and rays included to an extent).
  16. Guess it's like Warwick dolphins. They don't officially make them any more, but will make you one if you pay enough.
  17. I was going to ask that... But took a look on reverb;. This is a good price but not outrageously cheap. Why some brands hold their value so well and other don't is one of the great mysteries. Famous players is one factor I guess perceived collectabilty, investment opportunity and fashion I guess. Whatever, this remains a steal at £2k.
  18. Me too. Think the seller told me it was the only electric bass made by a Bristolian acoustic guitar maker. But a search of acoustic Luther's didn't help. Amazing "Smith plus" build quality and a great sound, but ugly as .... and not that comfy to play.
  19. Thought so. You let me have a play on it at a bass bash. One of the nicest fretted basses I've ever played; very even tempered and vice free. Though as well as double Ps, doesn't yours have separate filters per pickup too? Amazing value at £2k, I'd presumed these things cost Megabucks.
  20. My mk 1 fretless was £820 in 1997, the MK2, bought a couple of years back, over £4k!! The way Wals maintain and increase their value is a mystery .. compared to Smiths, Alembics, Warwicks ACGs etc. But there you go, this is what they cost. Bass Direct had a MK1 in less good condition than this the other week. £5000, sold in hours .. likely to the US.
  21. Both sit closer than a fender or a stingray, nether as close as my dolphin. The MK1 is more comfy for me. Not sure why. The Mk 2 feels bigger but isnt really, and only 450g heavier. Nerd that I am, drew round both to find out. With the bridges aligned, the heels of the bodies also line up (hence the poor access to the extra frets of the MK2 unless you bring your thumb round). Don't know why JC favours the MK2; if I only wanted four strings I'd stick with the mk 1. I'd like to try a MK3 though! Anyway, I've hijacked your sales thread so will wish you luck and push off 🙂
  22. Curious; why do you want a Mk2 especially? The MK1 is more comfortable to play, lighter for one thing. The extra frets above the octave are fun but the access isn't great. MK2 makes sense for 5 strings of course. Hope you don't regret losing such a lovely MK1.
×
×
  • Create New...