Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

bassaussie

Member
  • Posts

    522
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bassaussie

  1. [quote name='fernandobicho' post='1115422' date='Feb 4 2011, 04:05 PM']ooops forgot.............The spanish and portuguese languages are similar. We, portuguese, can understand well the spanish people... if they talk a bit slower!!!! But in the north atlantic Spain, in Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, Vigo, we can talk and understand each other without problems. I recommend you a visit to Galicia. They are very hospitable (as the Portuguese), and is a very beautiful region. Thanks[/quote] I agree with you, Galicians (Galegos) are really nice, very similar to Portuguese.
  2. [quote name='jsixties' post='1115226' date='Feb 4 2011, 02:22 PM']Not from Spain or Portugal, the great Fernando is from Sweden: [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rrCJRYVQGw"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rrCJRYVQGw[/url] Still dreaming with your bass my friend. [/quote] AWFUL joke!!
  3. [quote name='wombatboter' post='1115110' date='Feb 4 2011, 12:57 PM']I was close though :-) Sorry ! (still could understand it although the language is rather unknown to me)[/quote] Written, the two are fairly similar (maybe like Dutch and German, or some of the Scandinavian languages). They sound quite different when spoken, though, especially European Portuguese and Castilian Spanish.
  4. [quote name='wombatboter' post='1115075' date='Feb 4 2011, 12:15 PM']It's amazing how much Spanish one can understand without really knowing the language :-) A question : have you got any idea what you would want for the fretless neck (does it have the dots on the lines or between the lines ?) Muchos gracias :-)[/quote] And Portuguese as well!! (Fernando is Portuguese, as is the post above).
  5. That's a beautiful top on the bass. Really nice looking instrument. With the woods you've used, I keep thinking "This is what a Warwick Jazz bass would look like".
  6. He's been trying to flog that for years.
  7. [quote name='AndyMartin' post='1083239' date='Jan 9 2011, 04:02 PM']AFAIA it is Tune-O-Matic under a different name. Apparently he has a time machine which he uses to go back to the sixties to buy up new Fenders.[/quote] Right, I thought it was. Style looks similar, and the pricing is the same!
  8. Isn't this seller somehow related to Tuneomatic? He's that guy in California (I think) who seems to have a constant supply of vintage Fenders that he sells for obscene prices.
  9. That does seem to be a nice example of a vintage bass for a decent price. I have no idea what they're worth, though.
  10. [quote name='noelk27' post='1074904' date='Jan 1 2011, 11:59 PM']No, that's an excerpt from a much longer video, showing Edwards, Taylor and Nile Rodgers working out the parts Taylor would eventually play. But, in the interview sections, while all parties are discussing the recording process, it's clearly stated that Taylor plays all the final versions on the finished work.[/quote] The version I've always heard is that Edwards was asked to help John figure out a solo. They came up with the one on the record, but it was agreed simply to use Edward's original rather than have John re-record it. Taylor did the rest of the song, but the solo was Edwards. If you have a look around the internet, this seems to be pretty common knowledge.
  11. [quote name='Chris2112' post='1074159' date='Jan 1 2011, 05:46 AM']I think I recall a dicussion on Talkbass where it was revealed one of the slap solos or complex slap parts on one of the Powerstation records was actually Bernard Edwards! However, John is a fairly good player even if he did create some unplayable stuff in the studio! The line to "Girls on Film" is really quite tricky when you look at it and try to get it bang on with the record![/quote] Bernard Edwards did the bass solo on "Get It On". [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14kXaX5D6Ng"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14kXaX5D6Ng[/url]
  12. [quote name='wombatboter' post='1040909' date='Nov 29 2010, 10:46 AM']Very kind of you, thanks... bit off-topic but I always preferred to be really very down to earth about my playing. No doubt I can play a bit of bass but I've met so many musicians full of pretention that I always remained on guard whenever that horrible attitude would stick its head up (I'm a receptionist during the day so that keeps everything balanced). Taste and feel is the most important and technique is nice but I've experienced that the sort of bassplaying in the video mostly remains in my living room :-)[/quote] That's the thing I take from your video. You've got the chops, there's no doubt, and I'm actually surprised you think that you're not in a similar league to some of the wizards who show off similar skills. But it's also very obvious that you have a nice feel in your playing - even some of the really fast stuff you were doing still felt "right", like it was meant to be there.
  13. [quote name='wombatboter' post='1040383' date='Nov 28 2010, 08:16 PM']Thanks.. I feel a bit uncomfortable on five-strings (the muting is hard) so I'm selling all my five-strings. About the playing : spend five minutes on Youtube and you see bedside-wonders from Japan to Columbia playing amazing bass-lines. It is véry easy to stay with your feet on the ground when you see these young virtuosos play.. Luckily it's not all about speed but also about taste and making a band groove (that's the hard part) The bass is on hold meanwhile... Never expected it (thought it would disappear from the page in a day and need ten bumps and still) since it's an unknown brand. The sound and the looks seem to speak for themselves..[/quote] WB, first, that's a beautiful bass. Second, you should NEVER feel concerned about your playing. You've got talent absolutely oozing from you, both with technical prowess and a lovely sense of feel. I've watched that video a few times now, and I wish could pull off some of the fingerwork you were doing there, it's excellent.
  14. I've always wanted one of these, but that price is absurd.
  15. [quote name='retroman' post='993358' date='Oct 19 2010, 11:54 AM']I know what you mean...... I had been after a Bicentennial 'Bird for eons, and finally got one. I really want to gig it, but I can't help feeling scared to do so. Main things that bother me are cracking the headstock one by accident, or worse still, someone stealing it...... They definately are one of the iconic rock basses. Pete Way of UFO used one to great effect, and even Lemmy has been seen with one, identical to yours. Probably closest thing out there that Gibson made to doing the Thunderbird thing, but being far more practical, was the Les Paul bass. The current style of Thunderbird is easier to live with than the 60's, and 70's ones, thanks to its slimmer neck, and much smaller headstock, so the balance issues are far less noticeable. Go on, keep it, and get rockin' [/quote] When I bought it, I'd never had any real interest in T'Birds. The guy who owned it had quite a few old basses (a lot of Ricks, some nice Fenders), and he pulled this out and said "try this". My first impression was mainly of the great condition of it, but when I plugged it in, the sound was just amazing. About the neck size, I quite like it. I'm really not all that familiar with the modern ones, so couldn't really comment on that comparison.
  16. [quote name='JMT3781' post='993362' date='Oct 19 2010, 12:00 PM']Does the value of vintage instruments vary form country to country does anyone know? Or is just down to the varying value of different currency?[/quote] I think that sort of thing still exists, but it has tended to even out a lot with the growth of the internet. Inside the EU, although sellers in some countries will try to get a premium through rarity, they now have to compete with sellers from all over the EU, as there are no tax implications whern importing an instrument from within the EU. The US still tends to be less expensive than the EU, but even there I think the difference in price has got smaller.
  17. You could check out this bass. Maybe not quite what you're after in relation to being a J, but still Fenderesque, and at a good price currently. [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=106971"]Valenti 5 string on forum[/url]
  18. Thanks for all the replies. Just to add some more information, my main motivation for selling these is that I simply don't use them. They sit there, gathering dust, and I've got to a point where I feel it's time they were in the hands of people who intend to use then. The bass I'm most motivated in selling is the T'Bird. It's a beautiful example, and from the time I first saw it I wanted to buy it from the previous owner. However, I'm always scared of the fragility of the instrument - I realise that one unfortunate slip, and I've got a broken neck on my hands, which destroys the integrity of a nice piece, and obviously takes a lot of the value away as well. The Fenders don't worry me anywhere near as much, purely because they're a lot more robust. From a historical point of view, the T'Bird is a really enigma to me. I love the sound of it, and it really does live up to it's reputation of being a great rock bass. It makes me wonder why Gibson didn't make a bass with similar electronics and construction, but in a more accessible shape. I think they would've had a winner on their hands if they had.
  19. It's amazing that a bass of this quality is being sold at such a good price yet is still here.
  20. Right, some photos of the Fenders. I've tried to capture some of the imprefections as best as possible. [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=214"]Fender Precision 66 Front[/url] [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=212"]Fender Precision 66 Back[/url] [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=211"]Fender Precision 66 Full[/url] [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=210"]Fender Jazz 66 Full - 1[/url] [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=209"]Fender Jazz 66 Full - 2[/url] [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=208"]Fender Jazz 66 Body - 1[/url] [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=207"]Fender Jazz 66 Body - 2[/url] [url="http://www.ebassist.com/forum/picture.php?albumid=19&pictureid=206"]Fender Jazz 66 Back[/url]
  21. [quote name='Beedster' post='991762' date='Oct 17 2010, 10:56 PM']Let's see some pics of those Fenders mate [/quote] Yes, good point. I'm going to get some up today.
  22. [quote name='Beedster' post='991643' date='Oct 17 2010, 09:20 PM']I think people are reluctant because yet another BC disagreement could emerge Gareth! I know nothing about Gibson, and although I have VGPR for the last 8 years, I don't think they're much help in the current economic climate so my view is based on what I've seen over the last year or so. I would say that the two Fenders would fetch more than you've quoted, even in the current climate, perhaps up to £1000 more for the Jazz and around £500 more for the Precision. Although post CBS, '66 still attract a big market. This assumes they are 100% all original. Good luck with the sale BA[/quote] Thanks Beedster. I'm fairly confident of them being 100% original. The Precision was bought from a well known vintage store in London. The Jazz came from a respected member of this forum, and he also provided a certificate of authenticity that he'd got from another vintage store. The Gibson came from a friend of mine, but we both went over the bass and were confident of it's condition. Of course, you know how these things go, there's always a chance that something may be amiss, but I've made every effort to make sure of their originality.
  23. [quote name='gareth' post='991629' date='Oct 17 2010, 09:11 PM']I am surprised more comments have not been made on this post to help the poster. We have some knowledgeable vintage and/or fender/gibson experts on this site and wonder what there opinions are so as to assist the poster[/quote] I'm hoping to get more, but I've noticed that activity on the forum tends to die down over the weekends, so maybe there'll be some more responses tomorrow. Still, some good stuff so far.
  24. [quote name='gareth' post='990360' date='Oct 16 2010, 04:58 PM']Here are my initial thoughts:- 1976 Gibson Thunderbird - really nice condition (say 9/10), has the original case and ashtrays. Walnut colour, no neck break. £2000 1966 Jazz - Also really nice, some small wear on back of body (8.5/10). Again with original case and ashtrays. Oval tuners, block markers in sunburst. £3500 1966 Precision - All original, but more used than the other two (7/10). Sunburst. I don't have the ashtrays or case £3000[/quote] Thanks.
  25. [quote name='Nick449' post='990255' date='Oct 16 2010, 02:40 PM']I do understand the initial suspicions, because i was wrong on a couple of things, but i have put everything right; i've let everyone who was seriously interested know the changes and have re-adjusted somewhat my original post. Every source and price is now correct which is backed up by receipts, so i have no idea why people are still doubtful of some of the sources. I understand that i wouldnt make a profit on this item, but since i paid more than 850 (inc VAT) i still believe 450 is a decent, fair price. I will take in your remarks though and may end up selling it for parts instead, i'll give it 1 or 2 days, but it would be a shame to see this broken up :/[/quote] Hey Nick, seeing as though I kinda started this review of your thread, I thought I should at least add something positive. The parts you've got are all good gear. The fact you have the receipts is also very positive. It's difficult to explain why the value of some of the parts have lowered (ie. the body), but that could be for a variety of reasons - maybe WD source that part from somewhere else, maybe they've lowered the quality, who knows. Personally, I think splitting the bass would be your best option if you want to maximise your return. The only issue there is you'll most likely end up with one or two pieces that might take longer to get rid of, but then, you may reach your target value before they go anyway. I think the thing to learn from this thread is that you need to be as clear as possible in the description from the get go. It's ended up a bit of a train wreck, and obviously people are a little unsure of you because of the confusion. That's not necessarily a comment about your honesty, it's more a reflection of the mistrust that is found on the internet these days. There have just been so many scams pulled on the 'net, people struggle to believe anything that's not 100% substantiated, and once they feel unsure about something, it's very difficult to regain their confidence.
×
×
  • Create New...