[indent=1]I've been interested in Nash basses for a while now, and have almost purchased one on a few occasions. I've heard many reports both good and bad regarding their guitars and basses. Recently I read in these pages about a new London stockist, and having a rare trip to London planned, thought that there is really only one way to find out how these Nash basses sound: and that was to try one out myself. So I decided to stop off at Denmark Street at the new home of Nash guitars: Westside M.I. who are Nash distributors as well. After enquiring if they stocked Nash basses as well as guitars, I was taken down to the basement to the bass section, where to my surprise I found 8 Nash basses amongst the collection.[/indent]
[indent=1]I decided I’d like to try the one that hit me visually: an off-white Jazz with tort scratchplate. The first thing I noticed was it’s weight, it was heavy: guessing somewhere between 10 and 11 lbs. It was connected to a Mesa bass rig comprising of M Pulse 600 head and a 2 x 10 and 1 x 15 cabinet. I set the eq flat and proceeded to check out the JB 63 Nash bass, which as the model suggests is based on a 1963 Jazz bass. This one had been fitted with Di Marzio pick ups. The second thing I noticed was the action, which I found quite high. The bass felt good, it felt worn and comfortable, it was smooth and well balanced. It was finished extremely well in the heavy aging finish as stated by the tag. It looked good, in fact it looked great, very cool with the aged off white body and tort scratchplate. If there was a flaw in the look it the scratchplate itself which around the edges looked in pristine condition. The surface as well looked new except for the occasional surface scratch. Generally the aging looks the part, and feels right.[/indent]
[indent=1]So, what did she sound like? My first reaction was a bit dull. I experimented with the two pick up volumes and the tone control, but reducing the bass just left a thinner sound. I was able to change the tone with some adjustment on the amp.[/indent]
[indent=1]However, my overall feeling was that I was listening to strings and pick ups but not wood. The sound was without resonance, it felt flat and characterless. I was surprised also given the weight of the bass that the mass of wood was not more forthcoming in contributing to the sound of the bass. In fact I’m sure it was contributing to the sound of the bass; how could it not? But not in the way I would have liked. It wasn’t that the bass sounded awful or anything like that; no it just felt as if something was missing. My own reference points had been my own ’62 re issue Fender Jazz and a ’76 Fender Jazz, both of which have bags of woody tone.[/indent]
[indent=1]I decided to ask the assistant to let me try another Jazz. This time I chose a sunburst JB 63 fitted with Seymour Duncan pick ups.[/indent]
[indent=1]This had much the same feel although the aging was medium. Again it was heavy, and the action a little on the high side. It felt good and played well. Sound-wise it was different. It was brighter and capable of a larger tonal palette. I put this down to the pick ups, which could then be tweaked further on the amp.[/indent]
[indent=1]However I still felt that there was something missing in the tone department. And when I say missing, I mean missing at a really fundamental level. That real sense that every part of the instrument is important and integral to the overall sound. Sadly, I just didn’t have that feeling with either of these basses. For the money, and we are talking about £2400 for the former, and £2000 for the latter, there is much worthwhile competition from Fender Custom Shop, and the second hand market alike. Next time I think I’d like to hear the Nash Precisions to see if they fare any better.[/indent]