-
Posts
11,896 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Shop
Articles
Everything posted by LukeFRC
-
Is this even a clear cut fight? A lot of the newer micro amps will have some kind of processing to make them sound louder, a certain Eq here, a bit of compression here, a low end roll off there, or even full on DSP to squeeze as much power out of it as you can (TC RH I'm looking at you!) Not to say that that isn't a good thing in an amp but it does mean you're not comparing like for like. StingrayPete1977 mentioned his Shuttle 3.0 - which is a nice little amp - but the EBS will be putting out low end that the Shuttle is filtering out.... loudness alone is not a fair comparison
-
SOLD Tecamp M210 (neo version) 4 Ohm - Price drop to £350!
LukeFRC replied to LukeFRC's topic in Amps and Cabs For Sale
-
a very drool worthy bass. How does it sound?
-
specific enough you will probably need to go custom. If I were you I would get the parts made by USCG and then find a willing luthier to fettle the things together.
-
surely (and there are more who know more than me) but the benefit of bi-amping is splitting the signal to drivers that are best able to deal with that portion of the signal. The low end to a bass driver and the mids to a midrange driver etc. The crossover(s) you use will need to be right. I don't see much benefit of sending each pickup to a different amp if you're trying to get the "best and cleanest" sound.
-
Ply is a kind of lamination but not all lamination is ply.... Just throwing that out there!
-
Tecamp Puma 1000 amp (Powersoft Version) SOLD!
LukeFRC replied to LukeFRC's topic in Amps and Cabs For Sale
-
-
that's rubbish, 'aint it?
-
SOLD Tecamp M210 (neo version) 4 Ohm - Price drop to £350!
LukeFRC replied to LukeFRC's topic in Amps and Cabs For Sale
-
[quote name='funkle' timestamp='1384099906' post='2272730'] Thanks man. A shorter review could have been: An excellent cabinet whose only contender is another extremely specialised cabinet with fancy DSP, compression, and limiting built in. As for other passive cabinets... Of course not everyone wants a 'flattish' cab. If Alex starts doing powered cabinets or PA equipment, I think there's some incredible possibilities there. [/quote] My tecamp Puma 1000 has the same powersoft amp module as your Berg IP - if I knew how to programme DSP hacking into the Puma to add the DSP board to pair it with a BB2 would be the plan!
-
Tecamp Puma 1000 amp (Powersoft Version) SOLD!
LukeFRC replied to LukeFRC's topic in Amps and Cabs For Sale
-
A great You Tube bassist with an amazing StingRay.
LukeFRC replied to bubinga5's topic in General Discussion
i can see it -
Tecamp Puma 1000 Powersoft version - so 2x500w into 4ohm min or bridged at 1000w into 8ohm min.[list] [*]Amazing clear transparent preamp - 4 band Eq with well chosen points. [*]Low boost for a low mid hump (think tube amp) and high boost for... well I've never worked out why I'ld need it but you can add a lot of top end in. [*]A great wee compressor with two different delay times - so either a big fattener or a fatter but punchy as anything sound. [*]the taste knob- similar to the timbre on a thunder funk (apparently) one way vintage warm mids, the other way sharper mid scooped. A lot of folk love it. I leave it in the middle the whole time! [*]Effects loop wet/dry [*]mute [*]DI with all the usual gubbins. [*]Original box and manual with the rack ears (unused ever) [/list] Built around the powersoft digimod 1000 module it sounds amazing with a much bigger rounded bottom than most class D amp - weighs 3kg or so. Simply a fantastic amp - I've downsized my rig to a little combo - otherwise I'ld be keeping it, still quite tempted to be honest and pair it with a barefaced big baby, but thought I would offer it up for sale here first and if someone's after one then I'll live with the combo! As far as I'm concerned the powersoft tecamp puma range are some of the best class D amps around - IMO it wipes the floor of Markbass little mark and just sounds like it's got more balls! Kjung over on talk bass described the sound as "like a high end clean valve amp" - he prefers the 500 to the 1000 but I like the slightly different EQ settings on the 1000. This sounds different to the current Puma range which uses a different power amp module. £575 ONO [b]SOLD![/b] I also have a matching Tecamp M210-4 Cab here.... [url="http://basschat.co.uk/topic/221415-tecamp-m210-neo-version-4-ohm-price-drop-to-l375/"]http://basschat.co.u...e-drop-to-l375/[/url] want the whole rig and I'm sure the price can be negotiated down a bit!
-
SOLD Tecamp M210 (neo version) 4 Ohm - Price drop to £350!
LukeFRC replied to LukeFRC's topic in Amps and Cabs For Sale
-
good question
-
-
[quote name='molan' timestamp='1383778388' post='2269156'] I think this is where owning a 'vintage' bass becomes really interesting. For people looking for a certain sound or vibe then owning an original '64P and a similar era B15 represents the absolute pinnacle of tonal nirvana. Whether most people can hear any difference between these and modern equivalents is a, very, moot point. However, for many people, there is so much more to the enjoyment of playing than the simple sound that others can hear. For these people there's some sort of mystique to flipping the power switches on a B15, waiting for it to warm up and smiling as the Ampeg logo comes to life with a warm glow and then going to full power whilst caressing a silky smooth worn in neck from 50 years of gigging and with perfect fretting and a gorgeous feel. For a lot of people that genuinely is the definition of 'magical' This experience is pretty damn tough to replicate with modern kit and I'm absolutely sure that's why lots of people think nothing of dropping thousands on vintage gear. It makes them feel great and inspires them to play in a way that modern equipment never will. I'm not judging these people or saying that they are crazy to spend this sort of money on a couple of planks of wood, a few bits of rusty metal and some out of date electronics plus an amplification system that has its roots in a bygone era but I can completely understand their passion. If, simply by owning these ancient artefacts, they play longer and derive greater pleasure playing then that's only a good thing as far as I'm concerned. The difficult part is justifying cost. If you could remove cost from the equation would you have kept the '64 and B15 because of the amount of pleasure you got for them. If the replacements are not definitively 'better', however you might define that, then maybe the older models might have been more fun to play. The thing I always, without fail, find odd about discussions over expensive objects is that people so often deride others just because they've lashed out on something that may not have an intrinsically greater value than a far cheaper item. If it makes them happier then where's the harm? [/quote] Molan - I am interested - how do you find your modern vintage styled wes steed compare to your real '63 Jazz? how would you describe them tonally?
-
I think there's a article on barefaceds website saying why they make 8ohm cabs onthe mobile so can't link to it...
-
SOLD Tecamp M210 (neo version) 4 Ohm - Price drop to £350!
LukeFRC replied to LukeFRC's topic in Amps and Cabs For Sale
-
RE: sounds changing…. Given that if the body was carved by hand or made by CNC - as long as it is within the same tolerances it will make little to no effect on sound (but may on how the thing feels) … I think there are two things here that we can say (reasonably and logically) could change the sound of an instrument over time…. Pickups - different pickup winding techniques, different magnets (?) and the magnetic deterioration… and the wood…. now I'm not enough of an expert to know if a bass played over time changes the wood as it resonates (in that case a pristine 60's fender that's hardly been played wouldn't have this effect) - I think it's more likely to be the effect of being under tension for x number of years myself rather than vibrations… but hey ho - I don't know enough to argue that (and haven't been on a magazine cover either, been in the fine art section of the Skinny before…) But I think it's true to say that the wood stocks that would have been available for building guitars in 1957 at the scale Fender were will not look much like the wood stocks available for building guitars now in the scale that Fender/Gibson/Cort et al knock them out. I doubt they are from as old or natural growth, or have been naturally dried for as long and so on. Warwick in the early 90's had the selling point of "the sound of wood" and proudly showed off wood stacks that they kept to dry for years. It's interesting that when they increased production, and the quality was perceived to have dropped - they also stopped showing off their wood piles. I think recently they've scaled back production and started talking about how long they keep the wood to dry before they use it. But I dunno - Molan, your wes steed bass is a blend of old bits and new wood is't it? how does that sound?