Jump to content
Why become a member? ×
Scammer alert: Offsite email MO. Click here to read more. ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been experimenting with testing microphones. I used a Scarlett interface into my laptop and Friture to produce Mel & A-weighted spectrograms.

I used a HH Vector 8" producing pink noise over bluetooth as a sound source.

 

Speaker and mic 1.25m apart and 1.25m above the floor in large room with lots of soft furnishings, curtains.

 

Most obvious thing was the speaker had limitations, as you could see the same notches across all the mics.

 

The flatest response was... a £30 generic BM800 mid-sized condenser microphone. Often used with 5V from a PC, these run well on 48V phantom power and are very sensitive. Lots of hacks for their circuit or putting larger inserts in them. I haven't modded this yet, but it gave the biggest signal and flattest curve with widest frequency response of all the mics I tested...

 

I think this gives the best idea of the HH Vector's output. Note the dips at 450 and 550Hz which I guess may be the crossover frequency.

 

BM800genericmediumcondenser.thumb.jpg.f948c8053eacd50906f4d4fd1e1141e9.jpg

 

My other condenser mic - Behringer C2, used flat and with low cut, which drops around 3dB from around 100Hz ish. Interestingly the 550 dip is not very pronounced.

 

 

BehringerC2flat.thumb.jpg.06340c6e60f2c5853768e8aee378c919.jpgBehringerC2LowCut.thumb.jpg.1c13d6c735dbaa3d77c21ce029244e80.jpg

 

I think I need a better white noise source before repeating the experiment... things are going on for different types of mic, but I don't have confidence the sound source is flat enough to draw meaningful conclusions on anything but the sensitivity and the extent of the high/low frequency response.

 

image.thumb.png.f967397886060d714545240fe4718697.png

 

If anyone can recommend the ideal spectrogram settings, better software (Friture has no manual and appears to lack a simple save screenshot function) or any advice at all, all welcome!

Posted

You might want to have a look at sweep frequency generators - these generate a single variable frequency sweeping typically from 20Hz to 20kHz, and so you can get a frequency response by mapping amplitude against frequency.

Posted
11 minutes ago, tauzero said:

You might want to have a look at sweep frequency generators - these generate a single variable frequency sweeping typically from 20Hz to 20kHz, and so you can get a frequency response by mapping amplitude against frequency.

 

Good call. I asked Chatgpt for advice and that was one recommendation.

 

Another was to use software that allows me to calibrate using a reference mic... I know someone who may lend me one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...