NickA Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 9 hours ago, Stub Mandrel said: where >90% of the settings are poor that does indeed apply to my acg-eq-01 jazz with it's 8 pots ( volume & blend, LP filter & filter gain for each pu plus variable frequency and gain high frequency pass through). Easy to get lost in there! Not to the Wal tho ( a mere 4 pots and three pull switches) on which 90% of settings are good! Quote
crazycloud Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Woodinblack said: Eventually I will do the individual buffers for each string. I already have, but the amp stages are a bit current hungry and require outboard power, especially for 2 x 6 string pickups. They're very low noise and distortion and I'm not willing to compromise on the design to get it battery compliant. A simpler summing node design with 1 amp / pickup is about 95% as good, and no one would ever hear the difference. Details, as well as the outboard processing (y'all should be able to guess what that might be), later. Not intending to release it commercially. I have other more important projects in the near term, but it's all based on my older existing designs. 1 Quote
Woodinblack Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 18 minutes ago, crazycloud said: I already have, but the amp stages are a bit current hungry and require outboard power, especially for 2 x 6 string pickups. They're very low noise and distortion and I'm not willing to compromise on the design to get it battery compliant. A simpler summing node design with 1 amp / pickup is about 95% as good, and no one would ever hear the difference. Not sure why you would need to compromise on power - there are high quality opamps that take nA current now, more down to price than anything. But I always liked the idea, just to stop the loading of one element with another, goes all the way back to hearing the distortion channel on the original Roland GR300 Quote
Chienmortbb Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 23 hours ago, BigRedX said: IME buffers are only useful if you have a very long lead to your amp, and nowadays most people in this situation will be using a wireless system which essentially acts as a buffer. To an extent, I agree with you, but one issue with passive electronics require a relatively high input impedance in the amplifier, mixer, pedal. High input impedance basically equals high noise or hiss. Of course, if you are one of those nutters people that prefer true bypass, there is no hope for you. As someone that makes cables for people, it is in my interest for people to need better cables and to make the case for a quality low loss cable but yes a Wireless system does effectively make the bass active (or more correctly buffered). Of course, I also make cables to replace the ones supplied by Shure Sennheiser and Line 6. Personally, I use both passive and active basses but if the Fender Precision were introduced today, Leo would have installed a pre-amp (MusicMan?). Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 8 hours ago, crazycloud said: I concur with all of the above. My own design onboard pres have individual buffers for each PU. Swap active and passive in your comment to better reflect how I feel about the two topologies. As the designer you will have the understanding needed to get the best from them. If mire active basses were truly 'flat' with all controls centred and had less aggressive cut and boost than is typical, then they would be easier to use for the average owner. Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, NickA said: that does indeed apply to my acg-eq-01 jazz with it's 8 pots ( volume & blend, LP filter & filter gain for each pu plus variable frequency and gain high frequency pass through). Easy to get lost in there! Not to the Wal tho ( a mere 4 pots and three pull switches) on which 90% of settings are good! The hardest thing to get good results from is a sweepable mid. The problem is the ear tends to hear any change as an 'improvement' and you can go in circles. Also in a soundcheck situation, other band members are unlikely to have the patience for you to seek the ideal tone... Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 21 minutes ago, Chienmortbb said: Personally, I use both passive and active basses but if the Fender Precision were introduced today, Leo would have installed a pre-amp (MusicMan?). And Stradivarius woild have made his violins from carbon fibre reinforced plastic composites. Quote
Woodinblack Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Stub Mandrel said: And Stradivarius woild have made his violins from carbon fibre reinforced plastic composites. And maybe they would have sounded better! Quote
neepheid Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Chienmortbb said: Personally, I use both passive and active basses but if the Fender Precision were introduced today, Leo would have installed a pre-amp (MusicMan?). Eh, he flip-flopped about actives it over time. You forget G&L. The L-1000, which is probably the final destination for the P bass as he saw it is 100% passive, 2 band EQ. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.