Rich Posted Wednesday at 09:58 Posted Wednesday at 09:58 Up until now, my signal path has been bass>wireless>FX board>amp. But I'm wondering if perhaps the board could go in the amp's FX loop. I'm guessing possibly not as there are boost elements there, but I'd like to know what the team think. The amp is a Trace TE-1200 and this is my board. Quote
itu Posted Wednesday at 13:18 Posted Wednesday at 13:18 The biggest difference is most probably the changes in signal levels. Study the amp's manual. 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted Wednesday at 13:39 Posted Wednesday at 13:39 In the 80's/90's I always used the effects loop. Don't use it at all these days. 1 Quote
pete.young Posted Wednesday at 14:52 Posted Wednesday at 14:52 If you're going to put the board into the loop and plug the bass into the amp input, it might help to know whether the loop is serial or parallel. If parallel, only part of the signal will be modified by the effects (50% if there is no blend control). 1 Quote
StingRayBoy42 Posted Wednesday at 15:08 Posted Wednesday at 15:08 Isn't 'conventional wisdom' that stuff like delay works better in the loop and stuff like drive/OD work better in front of the amp? (Full disclosure: I've never used an FX loop) 1 Quote
Stub Mandrel Posted Wednesday at 17:03 Posted Wednesday at 17:03 1 hour ago, StingRayBoy42 said: Isn't 'conventional wisdom' that stuff like delay works better in the loop and stuff like drive/OD work better in front of the amp? (Full disclosure: I've never used an FX loop) So I understand. 1 Quote
MichaelDean Posted Wednesday at 18:49 Posted Wednesday at 18:49 3 hours ago, StingRayBoy42 said: Isn't 'conventional wisdom' that stuff like delay works better in the loop and stuff like drive/OD work better in front of the amp? (Full disclosure: I've never used an FX loop) I think that applies more to amps where you're generating a bit more dirt in the amp itself, so you want that coloured sound to be effected. It's all personal preference though. Try it and see if you like it. I found it wasn't worth the extra cabling required. 3 Quote
Higgie Posted yesterday at 01:30 Posted yesterday at 01:30 (edited) 6 hours ago, MichaelDean said: I think that applies more to amps where you're generating a bit more dirt in the amp itself, so you want that coloured sound to be effected. It's all personal preference though. Try it and see if you like it. I found it wasn't worth the extra cabling required. Precisely this. If the Amp is imparting an integral part of your tone, then it stands to reason that you might want certain effects to colour the tone you’re getting from the front end of the amp, ie delay, modulation etc. If the amp is literally just amplifying your board tones, chuck it all into the front of the amp. Edited yesterday at 01:30 by Higgie 2 Quote
BigRedX Posted yesterday at 08:56 Posted yesterday at 08:56 Whether or not to use the FX loop depends on 2 things: 1. Do you use the pre-amp of your amp to produce "drive" sounds via valves or some other circuitry? If so some effects like delay (definitely) and chorus/flanger/phaser (maybe depending on the sound you are after) will benefit from being on the effects loop. 2. Do you have effects that are expecting line-level rather than instrument level input signals? These always perform better in the effects loop. 1 1 Quote
Rich Posted yesterday at 10:50 Author Posted yesterday at 10:50 It's a no to both of those. To be honest, in light of what everyone's saying here, I think I'm going to follow the classic flowchart... 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.