Legal help knowledge needed - Warranty right on a second hand bass

[triplebass]

Can anybody help with this...

 

i'm in Belgium and would like to know what are my options in claiming warranty for a second hand bass (made in UK) that obviously has a production error. 

I believe EU law covers warranty in this case ("If you buy a second-hand item, the seller usually limits the guarantee to the legal minimum of one year. If he does not do this, you are entitled to a two-year guarantee in accordance with the law.")

 

What is the situation in UK regarding warranty on second hand products? The bass was made in 2024.

 

 

BACKSTORY:

i got a bass in a trade. I noticed a problem with the sound/volume balance when trying it out but i thought it could be solved with a setup or string change. The previous owner played with a compressor so  according to him didn't notice the problem.

I contacted the maker (UK) and was redirected to the PU maker (UK). Had new blades installed, didn't help, as it turns out the pickups used are too small. Weren't supposed to go on a 5 string bass at all according to the PU maker.

Don't know how to approach the maker now. I like the bass and would love to have the problem sorted. And I don't want to drop the bass off to another sucker.

 

Suggestions?

Thanks

 

[fretmeister]

If it was a private sale / trade then you have no rights against the maker.

 

If the second hand item was obtained from a business then you do have some. Your contract is with the business - not suppliers to that business.

So if you got it from a shop they should deal with it - not pass the problem to the pickup makers.

[triplebass]

1 minute ago, fretmeister said:

If it was a private sale / trade then you have no rights against the maker.

 

If the second hand item was obtained from a business then you do have some. Your contract is with the business - not suppliers to that business.

So if you got it from a shop they should deal with it - not pass the problem to the pickup makers.

it was a private trade.

so i have no right even though it's a "hidden deffect"?

My claim would be with the maker of the bass as it seems they installed a PU that shouldn't be there. The bass is perfectly balanced acoustically, but not when plugged in, the B and G have a massive drop in volume.

[M@23]

Have you fed that back to the bass manufacturer, that you’ve been advised by the PU manufacturer that the part isn’t suitable?!

Assuming it isn’t a tiny or brand new operation, and that this PU is a standard option, this must have come up for someone else previously, or in their own testing. How did they land on this particular PU? Must have been some testing. I would start a conversation about it with them, if you’ve not yet done so. 

[Beedster]

9 minutes ago, triplebass said:

it was a private trade.

so i have no right even though it's a "hidden deffect"?

My claim would be with the maker of the bass as it seems they installed a PU that shouldn't be there. The bass is perfectly balanced acoustically, but not when plugged in, the B and G have a massive drop in volume.

 

Ouch, 4-string PUPs on a 5-string bass, that's a pretty amateur design feature.

 

Personally I would just get it sorted, if it was a private deal it's a case of do your due diligence or accept the risk so you can't really go back to the seller now, and if the manufacturer/builder was that inept in the first place I'm not sure I'd want the bass going back to them for a fix.

 

Assuming the PUP cavity will take the correct size 5-string PUP's I'd suck up the cost and replace it/them. At least you can sell the originally installed 4-string PUPs. Good luck

[Beedster]

...why do I get the sense I can guess the maker......?

Edited 2 hours ago by Beedster

[warwickhunt]

In short, as it was a private transaction, you have no warranty or recourse to the manufacturer or the seller.  

 

As has been suggested you could attempt to reach out to the manufacturer and ask for a goodwill gesture of maybe swapping you correct pups for the ones you have installed or possibly to sell you correct pups at a discount.  However, they are under no obligation to do so, hence my approach (were I you) would be very cautious and conciliatory rather than demanding/accusatory.