[quote name='Ghost_Bass' timestamp='1485880697' post='3227469']
I think it's obvious that i was exagerating a bit on this . Active is active and passive is passive, etc...
My example was to point out the amount of users saying that they use a passive bass so they don't have to fiddle endlessly with the EQ section of an active bass but then they go and add a preamp pedal to their signal chain to be able to obtain the desired tone. The forum is filled with threads about "achieving this tone" that end up with the addition of a sansamp/vtbass/BDI/etc.
In those cases the fiddling avoided on the bass will move on to the pedal, don't you agree?
[/quote]
Well, I think it relates to the design of the given bass's sound; in the case of a passive one it has been optimised in one way, whereas an active one will have been targeted at the result after the electronics (or even the versatility of the electronics), even if they are just simple volume and tone.