Uniquely expensive . Although I suppose there are other brands that creep into their realm. Ritter possibly Alembic?
I'm not anti fodera, I just think on the timeline of maturation of the brand they have gone into a weird zone and one which they can't really get out of. Supply and demand is one thing but when the only people that can afford your basses are the wealthy (or very disciplined) your brand's perception will morph into something slightly unappealing (just check out some of the characters in the fodera club threads).
It's the same with Wals, when they went out of business, the whole fetishistic buzz became unbearable. They were unique and often great basses but the hype surrounding them was frankly nauseating. It's great news that they are back up and running and charging a reasonable amount for a good bass and that the hysteria surrounding them has abated.
I often suspect the hype and hot air that drives this fetish thing for basses is driven by wealthy collectors and to become a 'collectors brand' is not appealing, at least for me.