Bilbo

Used to live in Victoria Aveneue, Baneswell (left there in 1994). Drove though there in May and its three times the size now!!! Still got family in Cwmbran and St. Julian's. I'm the only bass player, tho

Where are you in Wales, Andi. I am from Cwmbran originally (now if Suffolk). Welcome to Basschat!

[quote name='Major-Minor' post='664083' date='Nov 24 2009, 05:53 PM']And Bilbo - believe me it IS a great achievement to successfully transcribe a piece of music, regardless of how complex or simple it is, or whether you can't physically play it yourself. If you are trying to copy a virtuoso player's solos, then at least you know what you have to work on, even if you might not finally achieve that level of playing. After all, having something to aim for is what drives every player to work on their technique and their musical understanding. If you want to commit to memory what another player has already put down on record, then I would suggest putting away your manuscript and pencil, and copy it directly into your brain and into your fingers. It helps to "see" the written notes in your head, but its great training for your muscle memory and musical memory if you take it straight from the audio into your head. Then you can copy their every inflection plus all the things that are so difficult to write down.[/quote] Fair point. I guess its about deciding why you are doing it in the first place and making sure you get out of it what you are looking for. For me, learning TO PLAY transcriptions by Parker etc was the way I learned be-bop phrasing etc. The mathematical relationships between the notes were one thing but the spirit of the music was another. That was harder to write down and was primarily an aural experiece.

Can you raed tihs? Olny srmat poelpe can, alelgdely. cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. As I always say, the three most important things to take away from your basic education are Literacy and Numeracy.

I agree with that. If you can't play what you have transcribed, you haven't really achieved much other than copied down a series of noises in order of pitch!

I love recording. Ironic because I have never actually recorded anything I can say I am 100% happy with. If I had to find music to put on a MySpace page, I would struggle to find anything I could say I was proud of. Sad but true.

I use 'Transcribe' software from seventhstring.com. It slows stuff down up to quarter speed without changing the pitch and has some other features that work for me (like isolating and looping passages etc). Its available as a download for about £40. Tom's advice is sound. I would add that you need to make sure that, if you are transcribing the bass parts or solos off recordings, you also need to make sure that you have the chords available or can transcribe them also. This is as important as catching the lines you are transcribing as, without the context, the learning is limited to playing by rote, a pretty useless skill in improvising/writing your own lines. If you don't know the chords, or aren;t sure, post them here. Someone will tell you where you are going wrong (Major-Minor is great at that). As Tom said, start small and work upwards. Sometimes it is important to catch every detail but sometimes this is less important and catching the core riffs/patterns is enough. Trying to work out every single lick in a 12 minute Dave Holland tune is probably not worth the time spent (arguable, I guess). I woudl also recommend you place due emphasis on READING the charts you write as well as writing them. I have doen loads of complicated transcriptions that I can't play. The learning is limited there also. A Joe Lovano solo where he is playing 11 over 8 at 320 bpm is unlikley to be of much use to you! Sometimes transcribing a two bar sequence is more useful to you that a six chorus Coltrane solo. Good luck and don't forget to post some of your efforts here!

[quote name='Mykesbass' post='661323' date='Nov 21 2009, 08:31 PM']Where the Abersold series fell down for me was that it was for lead instruments - this looks like it's going to break you in gently into the rhythm section. I'm definitely going to try some. Mike[/quote] I find them useful as they let you take the bass out by turning the balance to the left which isolates the piano/guitar. You can transcribe lines if you want to. All good stuff.

Sounds great. Would love to try out but its a bit too far for me (70 miles?). Never mind. Hope you find someone useful.

[quote name='Major-Minor' post='658291' date='Nov 18 2009, 04:33 PM']My orchestral bass cost me £300 in 1973. It's now worth in excess of £25K. Now that's a good investment ! The Major[/quote] I'll give you £350 for it

I saw Yes a couple of times in the 80s, once woth Anderson and once with the Buggles' crowd. Whilst I recall being appalled at the Buggles idea, I bought the LP and there is some strong material on there. Its in no way a dead duck and I prefer it to 90125. It was the Trevor Rabin line-up that killed it for me. It lost a lot of its 'proginess' for me, like post ABACAB Genesis. I love all the stuff from Yes, Time and A Word, The Yes Album, Fragile, Close To The Edge, TAles of Topographic, RElayer, Going For The One, Tormato and Drama - its all great stuff. What is interesting, though, is that I bought all the solo LPs; Olias, BEginnings etc but the very last one I bought, because it didn't appeal to me, was Bruford's Feels Good To Me which, in a nutshell, got me into fusion and jazz. Jeff Berlin and Allan Holdsworth immediately made me realise how much more there was to virtuosity than what Howe and Squire were offering.

[quote name='Pete Academy' post='658864' date='Nov 19 2009, 08:16 AM']My original thought was this: You are a reader, and suddenly get a call to dep for a show or session, where you have never heard the tunes before, and circumstances don't allow you to do so. Would the dots and rests and accents signpost you enough to be able to play the music as it was originally intended to sound and feel?[/quote] If I get called at short notice for a reading gig that is pop, funk or rock orientated, I will have no trouble fitting in. If the call was for something orchestral, I would be out of my depth completely. Its not the dots that makes the gig a runner, its the genre. You don't necessarily need to know every pop tune or rock tune etc to pull it off. You need to know the 'default' variable of the genre. If I get a call for a Latin gig, I can deliver because I have digested most Latin sub genres. I may not know the tunes but I will know how to play a samba, a bossa, xote or guaguanco which are some groove types in Latin music. Its no different that if someone says it a swing tune, or a shuffle or a ballad. Each song form has its own protocols that determine the varaibles within which you will be expected to work. It doesn't mean you can't throw in something fresh or original but it does give you a sense of what the core expectations are. It all gets more complicated the more folkloric the material is. So, if a Brazillian singer/ guitarist says 'bossa', it will be different that a jazz pianist saying the same thing. So there are levels of competence from good enough to great depending on levels of professionalism required. Often the dots are like a script. They tell you what to say but it is up to you, the interpreter of those dots, to make it live and breath; like a great actor reading that script vs. a layman just reciting it in a monotone.

Its not just about the dots. Its also about understanding the genre you are playing in. A classical player who can read anything cannot just go into a jazz or a rock session and make it happen without some comprehension of the medium they are engaging with. I had a BBC Welsh Symphony Orchestra first bassist dep for me in a big band once (his call) but, despite reading every note 'correctly' he didn't come even close to swinging. If you ever read a classical score along with the music being played, you will quickly realise that the dots are only a part of the story. You have to know the genre.

Met him once in Cardiff. Impeccable technique and a joy to watch. He will be missed.

[quote name='RhysP' post='655210' date='Nov 15 2009, 02:45 PM']It looks like it was designed by Picasso.[/quote] From Wikipedia 'Metheny plays a custom-made Pikasso I created by Canadian luthier Linda Manzer on "Into the Dream" and on the albums Quartet, Imaginary Day, Jim Hall & Pat Metheny, Trio->Live, and the Speaking of Now Live and Imaginary Day DVDs. Metheny has also used the guitar in his guest appearances on other artist's albums. Manzer has also made many acoustic guitars for Metheny, including a mini guitar, an acoustic sitar guitar, and also the baritone guitar, which Metheny used for the recording of One Quiet Night. His latest use of the Pikasso is found on the album Metheny Mehldau Quartet, his second collaboration with pianist Brad Mehldau and his trio sidemen Larry Grenadier and Jeff Ballard; the Pikasso is featured on Metheny's impressionistic composition "The Sound of Water."' So your reference to Picasso was more accurate than you thought. It does sound remarkable but I am not wholly convinced of its versatility/practical applications.

[quote name='Cairobill' post='655984' date='Nov 16 2009, 02:36 PM']Rufus Reid DVD for 16 quid! Buy it now, it's all in there... [url="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Evolving-Bassist-Rufus-Reid/dp/0757915655/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1258382107&sr=8-3"]http://www.amazon.co.uk/Evolving-Bassist-R...2107&sr=8-3[/url][/quote] Could be worth a look - I have had the book for 25 years!

[quote name='jakesbass' post='655825' date='Nov 16 2009, 11:29 AM']Enjoy, you will prosper spiritually on it as it is the natural home of your second love (assuming your significant other is 1st) Jake[/quote] I wish I was still living in Farnham and could come to you for lessons (I used to live in Field End, Badshot Lea, on the old Aldershot Road). Would have saved me some grief. I was actually living there when I had my bad experience (you weren't there that far back - I left in 2002/3). I am already struggling to find a teacher up here (Google is proving unhelpful!!) but am determined to be patient and do this right. PS am listening to James Taylor as I write - that's your fault too!

Some of you may recall that I have posted here reporting a bad experience with the DB and discussed some injuries I have sustained which still cause me some twinges and aches. Well, an opportunity to try the instrument again has dropped in my lap and I wanted to hear some concensus from double bass players who have learned the instrument later in life (i.e. not a a child but as an adult learner). I am hoping to get a sense of whether I can go at this again without further difficulties or without aggravating existing issues (currently feeling quite minor). It would be my intention to get a tutor and not try and go it alone but I guess my question is, can you learn the double bass later in life without going through the pain and misery of aching limbs, bad backs and bleeding callouses I'd really like to do this but am anxious that I may be making a rod for my own back. How did others fare?

17 years....

[quote name='jacko' post='651994' date='Nov 11 2009, 09:08 PM']Why not? Just because you think isherwood and mailer are better doesn't mean anyone else will neccessarilly agree with you. What one person thinks is good another person will think is pish as sure as eggs are eggs. like I said, music is not a competetive sport so there can be no winners or losers, only participants. Ok... I may have a preference for a certain player but it certainly doesn't mean that person is any better than someone who's music I don't like.. If the thread had been entitled 'favourite british bassist' then I think the discussion would be a whole lot more valid (although I have to say my favourite changes from day to day depending on mood and what I've been listening to).[/quote] I have no preference for Isherwood or Mailer. My point is that a discussion on 'better' is as valid as one on 'favourite', arguably more so. Of course its not a competition but a comparison of skills, creativity, originality, core skills etc etc is more valid that one of 'sales'. The 'its all good' argument is a denial of passion and surrenders to the kind of ambivalence that results in mediocrity. I don't care who anyone likes or dislikes but I do want to know what people think about other people's playing. 'It's all good' is not an opinion. It is the absence of one. I want to know what folks think not what they don't!!

[quote name='EssentialTension' post='651952' date='Nov 11 2009, 08:25 PM']I really like your lists Bilbo, they've cost me a fortune at iTunes and Amazon but I've heard a lot of new music. [/quote] Then my work here is done... (I'm filling up )

[quote name='jacko' post='651830' date='Nov 11 2009, 05:56 PM']Music is an art form, not a competition. We're all going to have our own preferences so there's no real way we can say one player is better than the other.[/quote] Disagree.... We can all argue over Christopher Isherwood vs Norman Mailer or Shakespeare vs Brecht but noone is going to say Jeffery Archer is a better novelist or Victoria Wood a better playwrite. There are obviously sujective elements to it but it is perfectly defensible to argue that a is better than b. Otherwise everything is great and it most certainly is not. Am I the only one here who sees the value in debate? Some folk seem to think the only 'cool' space to be in is to live and let live and agree that everything is brilliant. Serene but BORING Maybe its a Welsh thing?

That Two Against Nature dvd was what got me into them a couple of years ago. Saw it, loved it, bought it, and several cds since. And I'm a jazz nazi. The interviews are a joke. Lighten up!

I use an Eden Metro for all gigs (jazz/rovk/funk/pop/big band) and an SWR/GK MB112 hybrid for small rehearsals. The SWR/GK just doesn't but it for live work. I have looked at the Markbass stuff and, whilst I liked it, I didn't find myself coveting it. I'll stick to the Eden for now - I think it does the job admirably and everyone I play with says it sounds great so why change.

Sorry, peeps, its my autism (although these are all really big names in jazz - or is that an oxymoron ) Staying with Katy Lied, I love the vocal harmonies on Dr. Wu....