Bilbo

[quote name='Flanker' post='731488' date='Feb 1 2010, 11:32 AM']To the vast majority of the worlds population the cost of a MIM Fender Jazz would equate to a Bentley to most of us.[/quote] Good point well made.

Its got to be the music. Without that, the basses are just planks of wood with wires attached. I have long thought that some people are so into the gear and messing about with it that they forget to get good at playing it. I acknowledge it is important to invest time and effort in ensuring that your gear is of appropriate professional quality but, after that, its hair splittin' . One of my twitches comes when people say things like 'I like the sound of a Jazz ovber a Precision'. I have no idea what the difference is. Or a graphite nut over a wooden one. Or pick-up configurations. Or woods. I pick up a bass and see if it sounds subjectively 'good' and play on. If it doesn't, I look for another one. But I have only played around 10 basses in my life and all but two were perfectly satisfactory. I guess that's why noone has heard of me :lol:

Is it just me? Is it my age but I grew up in a world where you lived within your means and made do with what you could afford. I love the look of these basses and would love to own an Anthony Jackson model six-string but, despite earning a very good salary and living a fairly unostentatious lifestyle, I just can't justify the expense. Like others, I could sell my Gibson ES175, Ovation Adamus, Takamine CD132SC and Status Energy 5 - but, if I did, I still wouldn't have enough to get a Fodera unless I sold the Wal as well. To be blunt, its not worth it. I don't care how great they sound (and they do), as a mere mortal, I can't justify that level of sacrifice and expenditure for a bass. WIth absolute respect to some of you guys, I don't know where any of you get the money for these basses! I did a latin gig last night with the Wal/Eden Metro and it sounded marvellous. I can live with denying myself the Fodera. And, as I always say, its the music that matters not the gear.

Don't forget my bass players mantra: 'Nobody notices you unless you catch fire'.

To get it good, you have to practice. TO get it great - noone knows. That's why its so great when it happens. One thing that is important, however, is your respective sounds. A poorly chosen ride cymbal can kill your bass sound. A great one can lift it and let it fly.

Kenny Garrett - Triology

[quote name='silddx' post='727381' date='Jan 28 2010, 10:54 AM']We had an artist support us called Betty Steeles. She had a fantastic upright player who was having so much fun. Can't find out anything about him though, he's not mentioned on her website or myspace.[/quote] PM her on myspace and ask. As for Chris Childs, I used to watch him in pubs in Cardiff when he was doing deps for Pino who had just broke with Go West and Paul Young. He played as Status headless as I recall. Great player.

There is no quick route. Its practice, practice, practice (it shouldn't take very long to get a handle on it for bass lines. Its only usually solos that get so complex that they can't be played in one position).

Faithless - the convention when writing swing solos is to write them as even quavers/8th notes and then indicate 'triplet swing feel' at the start. It means you haven't got to spend so much time writing triplet figures (which are also very hard to read).

Fun is overated. Being a great bass player requires you to get off on making other people sound good. Once you get that and make it so, its the best fun in teh world. But getting to that space is not all 'fun'; it can be damned hard work. Satisfying? Rewarding? Yes, but fun? Not always. But what I will say is that, particularly in the early stages, it is when it is NOT fun that most of the learning is taking place.

Just listening to it and have to say, I had forgotten how good some of this stuff is. The time signatures are all over the place. The bit I think you are thinking is 15/8 actually a bar of 4/4 followed by a bar of 7/8 (8+7 is 15). So, yes, it is technically 15/8 although it can be broken down more easily. All they are effectively doing is dropping a beat every second bar (it gets more complicated than that as there are bars of 3, 4 and 7 alternating here and there). It is easy enough to count as they have a note on every sub-division (i.e. 15 notes across 15 quavers).

Which Genesis track (never heard of 15/16) - its about breaking it down to manageable chunks. 7/4 can be a 3 and a 4 or a 4 and a 3. 5/4 can be a 4 and a 1, a 3 and a 2 of a 2 and a 3. I would expect 15/16 to be 3 4s and a 3. To be horrible blunt. if its Genesis, its unlikely to be that complicated. They tend to think in one bar patterns and don't cross bar lines much.

I have transcribed the head and solos to this and want to complete the chart with the chords. In an effort to try to avoid having to spend the time going through it and finding each chord by ear (its taken a fortnight to do what I have already done), I am posting to ask whether anyone has the chords already? In case you're wondering. yes, its bl**dy hard!

[quote name='Golchen' post='722915' date='Jan 24 2010, 10:33 AM']Jeff Berlin: Bach - Beautiful fluid fingerstyle[/quote] In case you missed it.... [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=73033&hl=jeff+berlin+bach"]http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=...eff+berlin+bach[/url]