New Bass Bridge, How many...

[Lozz196]

2 hours ago, BassAdder60 said:

No channels to prevent side movements? That’s partly why I use Gotoh 

That was my main reason for replacing bridges on my Mex Fenders.

[Gazz]

2 hours ago, BigRedX said:

 

How is this different from the standard Fender BBOT?

It's just the build quality, far superior, you have to hold it to see what I mean, the BBOT just seems a bit tacky side by side, I'm pleased and that's all..... 

[Gazz]

34 minutes ago, Lozz196 said:

That was my main reason for replacing bridges on my Mex Fenders.

There are channels to prevent sliding, give your glasses a wipe man. 

[Gazz]

2 hours ago, Beedster said:

 

Crikey, also 500% the cost, in fact Badass territory.

 

Not sure I can see any basis for it being much of an improvement on the BBOT either. I'm sure it's beautifully engineered, but at that price I'd want some of the functionality/versatility of a Badass or Fender Elite version (the latter also surprisingly expensive to my mind)

'at that price'?? Far cheaper than the Babics Z, and better build quality than THE Fender BBOT, side by side it's far better.. 

[Lozz196]

18 minutes ago, Gazz said:

There are channels to prevent sliding, give your glasses a wipe man. 

Tsk tsk

[Beedster]

35 minutes ago, Gazz said:

....and better build quality than THE Fender BBOT, side by side it's far better.. 

 

OK, I'll bite, in what way is it better quality? 

[Bassassin]

4 hours ago, BigRedX said:

 

How is this different from the standard Fender BBOT?

 

It's got a nice brushed finish & a word on it. 👍

[LawrenceH]

 In fairness a replacement Fender Pure Vintage 70s bbot is £50+ (I discovered much to my annoyance when wanting to restore a 70s reissue to stock).

 

Think this is stainless steel which given the corrosion on a few old bbot I've got isn't a bad idea, and probably it's a bit more rigid. Anyway it has a certain look to it and really we all know aesthetics matter!

[Beedster]

8 minutes ago, LawrenceH said:

 In fairness a replacement Fender Pure Vintage 70s bbot is £50+ (I discovered much to my annoyance when wanting to restore a 70s reissue to stock).

 

Think this is stainless steel which given the corrosion on a few old bbot I've got isn't a bad idea, and probably it's a bit more rigid. Anyway it has a certain look to it and really we all know aesthetics matter!

Yes but the PV 70s allows you multiple string alignment option so is a better bridge. The bridge in question is to all intents a standard BBOT. 
 

But yes, aesthetics matter 👍

[LawrenceH]

13 minutes ago, Beedster said:

Yes but the PV 70s allows you multiple string alignment option so is a better bridge. The bridge in question is to all intents a standard BBOT. 
 

But yes, aesthetics matter 👍

Not the 70s version! The one with threaded saddles is the 58 I think.

[Beedster]

3 minutes ago, LawrenceH said:

Not the 70s version! The one with threaded saddles is the 58 I think.

Fair point 👍

[Stub Mandrel]

On 19/01/2026 at 13:17, Gazz said:

Need any reviews, or recommend a new bridge for Fender Jazz bass. 

I've looked at both the Babics Z and the Halon, any advice? Thanks Gaz 

 

If you want a genuine solid traditionsl jazz bass sound with excellent articulation and sustain, then I recommend one of these:

 

 

[Stub Mandrel]

1 hour ago, LawrenceH said:

Not the 70s version! The one with threaded saddles is the 58 I think.

 

Late fifties & sixties.

[Stub Mandrel]

I dig in hard, and I mever suffer with bridge saddles sliding.

 

I have four or five basses with high mass bridges... have never noticed any difference. 

 

Funnily enough my first two basses (mid 80s) would qualify as high mass ... so perhaps I've 'devolved'.

[tauzero]

7 hours ago, Gazz said:

There are channels to prevent sliding, give your glasses a wipe man. 

 

Very cunningly concealed, they're completely invisible.