Jump to content
Why become a member? ×

73Jazz

Member
  • Posts

    539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 73Jazz

  1. I own the Boss Tu3, which works really fast and accurate. Before that, i owned the korg Pitchblack but the Boss is better in my oppinion, because i recognized it a little bit faster. There is also the the TC Polytune..i think they are nearly the same, more an optical preference and just "gusto".
  2. I prefer the live version in Australia, but couldn`t find it on youtube
  3. Sass Jordan about loving a heroin addict
  4. sry for spamming..but there are sooo many beautiful songs out there^^ another one with sad lyrics
  5. I would recommend getting an used [url="http://www.thomann.de/gb/fender_squier_vint_mod_jazz_nt.htm"]Vintage modified Jazzbass[/url]. these are awesome instruments for their money, maybe this sound will fit your needs without a preamp. give them a try, they are in my opinion the best low budget basses out there. If you still want an active one, you will have money left from the 250 gbp and you can spent it for a) an used onboard preamp (audere,j-retro etc) or better b ) bying an outboard preamp, so you do not have to change your bass and if your sound preferences are changing you just change the outboard pedal. why are you looking for especially an active bass?
  6. Thats why players love those vintage basses..it is not that word[]
  7. [quote name='ikay' post='1095060' date='Jan 19 2011, 01:54 PM']DR Sunbeams have a soft touch and good depth of tone. I use 40-100s on my 72 J. Great strings and definitely worth a try if you haven't done already[/quote] +1
  8. maybe if you play like him, you know why
  9. [quote name='4-string-thing' post='1094954' date='Jan 19 2011, 12:42 PM']anything built after 1966 was rubbish.[/quote] everything after 65 is rubbish..hrhr
  10. The 60`s P are getting more and more rare, are getting too expensive for a normal bass player, so it is getting to the next step the 70`s P. It is a question of supply and demand. [quote name='Bassnut62' post='1094907' date='Jan 19 2011, 11:55 AM']Not so long ago there was broad consensus that late 70s Fenders were dreadful second rate instruments to play and sounded pretty poor too.[/quote] may be that is wrong? For me it sounds more like an often heard prejudice. First of all, what is late 70`s?Is late 70`s also 76 or is that more a mid 70`s?You understand what i mean? It is too common. As i played and owned many Fender basses also from 75-80, there are more normal weight P basses than heavy weights out there. The bigger part are fantastic basses out there and it is easy to sort out the good ones fast. What is good about late 70`s P basses: First of all...THEY ROCK! They definitely do not sound pretty poor. Compared to a 60`s P they sound a little bit "smaller", but therefor they have more bite. The 60`s are more warm sounding, a little "deeper" than the 70`s, but the 70`s cut like a sword and nail it down, some are more than funky! Both are basses from heaven, you have to decide which sound you prefer and in which context you want to be where. Saying one is better than the other is in my oppinion not right. how could green be a better colour than red? Interesting is, to hear how the sound from early 60`s over late 60`s to early 70`s and then to late 70`s developed, i think according to how the whole music changed in these times.
  11. [quote name='Jam' post='1094659' date='Jan 19 2011, 12:41 AM']You sir, (you are a sir and not a miss, right?) have stunning taste.[/quote] Ups, i updated my profile. Yes i am male. Thank you very much for your words This thread is a kind of inspiration for me, listening to old favourites of mine again. If you enjoy it, i am very happy about it.
  12. Instrumental, Classic Orchestra by Celtic Frost Wonderful piece from Opeth
  13. [quote name='clashcityrocker' post='1094084' date='Jan 18 2011, 06:01 PM']wow maple fretless looks damm hot mate[/quote] Thanks:)
  14. [quote name='KiOgon' post='1094040' date='Jan 18 2011, 05:28 PM']Thanks[/quote] You are welcome, if there is anything else you would like to see, just let me know [quote name='silddx' post='1094028' date='Jan 18 2011, 05:17 PM']The neck wood is lovely![/quote] Yes, even without the signature, this bass is one of the most beautiful basses i ever did seen in the last 22 years. As i said before: "Fender took their best instrument to present it to Lemmy, thats for sure."
  15. [quote name='KiOgon' post='1093993' date='Jan 18 2011, 04:57 PM']Any chance of some detailed pictures of the signature please? Do you know what type of ink or other material was used for the signing? Will it react, (or has it already), with the Nitro finish I guess is what I'm asking? Has the sig. been varnished/sealed over? Also detail pic's of the 'choice wood' would be good, rear of body & neck particularly to see the grain/pattern. Cheerz, John[/quote] I do not know which ink has been used and it is not been sealed over, it has not been reacting with the finish yet.
  16. [quote name='Clarky' post='1093973' date='Jan 18 2011, 04:44 PM']Edit: too slow[/quote] ..but kind
  17. [url="http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=59127&hl=feedback+73jazz"]http://basschat.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=...feedback+73jazz[/url]
  18. [quote name='mart' post='1093955' date='Jan 18 2011, 04:34 PM']I can't see the pics.[/quote] Thanks for your help. I fixed it.
×
×
  • Create New...